Biological Invasions

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1255–1268 | Cite as

How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts?

  • Daniel SimberloffEmail author
Original Paper


It would be an exaggeration to argue that most invasions produce ecosystem impacts, and the term should be reserved for cases in which many species in an ecosystem are affected. However, certain facts suggest that true ecosystem impacts are more common than is normally assumed. First, the term “ecosystem impact” has often been reserved for cases in which the nutrient regime or nutrient cycling is affected, whereas physical structural and other changes in ecosystems ought to be included. Second, as with all ecology, very few systems and species have been studied relative to all those that exist, so it is likely that many ecosystem impacts remain to be detected. Third, there are many types of impacts, many are idiosyncratic, many are subtle, and many are indirect, so it is likely that many impacts have simply not been recognized even in studied systems. Finally, the frequency of the lag phenomenon in invasions implies that at least some existing non-native species that are currently having little or no impact will eventually have much greater ones. These facts suggest that, even if it would be an overstatement to say that most invasions cause ecosystem impacts, it would not be more of an overstatement than the common assertion that very few introduced species have any significant impact.


Fire regime Habitat structure Invasional meltdown Lag time Nutrient cycling 



I think Nathan Sanders and three anonymous referees for many insightful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.


  1. Abbott KL (2004) Alien ant invasion on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean: the role of ant-scale mutualisms in the dynamics of supercolonies of the yellow crazy ant, Anoplolepis gracilipes. Monash University, Melbourne (PhD Thesis)Google Scholar
  2. Allen JA (1998) Mangroves as alien species: the case of Hawaii. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:61–71Google Scholar
  3. Allombert S, Martin J-L (2007) The effects of deer on invertebrate abundance and diversity. In: Gaston AJ, Golumbia TE, Martin J-L, Sharpe ST (eds) Lessons from the islands: introduced species and what they tell us about how ecosystems work. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp 87–92Google Scholar
  4. Anderson CB, Griffith CR, Rosemond AD, Rozzi R, Dollenz O (2006a) The effects of invasive North American beavers on riparian plant communities in Cape Horn, Chile. Do exotic beavers engineer differently in sub-Antarctic ecosystems? Biol Conserv 128:467–474Google Scholar
  5. Anderson CB, Rozzi R, Torres-Mura JC, McGehee SM, Sherriffs MF, Schüttler E, Rosemond AD (2006b) Exotic vertebrate fauna in the remote and pristine sub-Antarctic Cape Horn Archipelago, Chile. Biodiv Conserv 15:3295–3313Google Scholar
  6. Aplet GH (1990) Alternation of earthworm community biomass by the alien Myrica faya in Hawaii. Oecologia 82:411–416Google Scholar
  7. Asner GP, Vitousek PM (2005) Remote analysis of biological invasion and biogeochemical change. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 102:4383–4386Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson IAE (1985) The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effect on island avifaunas. In: Moors PJ (ed) Conservation of island birds. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, pp 35–81Google Scholar
  9. Barros E, Curmi P, Hallaire V, Chauvel A, Lavelle P (2001) The role of macrofauna in the transformation and reversibility of soil structure of an oxisol in the process of forest to pasture conversion. Geoderma 100:193–213Google Scholar
  10. Beadle NCW (1966) Soil phosphate and its role in molding segments of the Australian flora and vegetation, with special reference to xeromorphy and sclerophylly. Ecology 47:992–1007Google Scholar
  11. Beekey MA, McCabe DJ, Marsden JE (2004) Zebra mussel colonisation of soft sediments facilitates invertebrate communities. Freshw Biol 49:535–545Google Scholar
  12. Berkman PA, Garton DW, Haltuch MA, Kennedy GW, Febo LR (2000) Habitat shift in invading species: zebra and quagga mussel population characteristics on shallow soft substrates. Biol Invasions 2:1–6Google Scholar
  13. Bertness MD (1984) Habitat and community modification by an introduced herbivorous snail. Ecology 65:370–381Google Scholar
  14. Bond WJ, Slingsby P (1984) Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism: the argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteacea. Ecology 65:1031–1037Google Scholar
  15. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Müller-Schärer H, Thuiller W, Peterson AT, Guisan A (2007) Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10:701–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brooks JL, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Kelley JE, DiTomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677–688Google Scholar
  17. Bunt JS (1995) Continental scale patterns in mangrove litter fall. Hydrobiologia 295:135–140Google Scholar
  18. Burdick A (2005) Out of Eden. An odyssey of ecological invasion. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Cale P, Hobbs R (1991) Condition of roadside vegetation in relation to nutrient status. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 353–362Google Scholar
  20. Callaway RM, DeLuca TH, Belliveau WM (1999) Biological-control herbivores may increase competitive ability of the noxious weed Centaurea maculosa. Ecology 80:1196–1201Google Scholar
  21. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Barth S, Ramsey PW, Gannon JE (2004) Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–1071Google Scholar
  22. Caraco NF, Cole JJ (2002) Contrasting impacts of a native and alien macrophyte on dissolved oxygen in a large river. Ecol Appl 12:1496–1509Google Scholar
  23. Chauvel A, Grimaldi M, Barros E, Blanchart E, Desjardins T, Sarrazin M, Lavelle P (1999) Pasture damage by an Amazonian earthworm. Nature 398:32–33Google Scholar
  24. Coen LD, Brumbaugh RD, Bushek D, Grizzle R, Luckenbach MW, Posey MH, Powers SP, Tolley SG (2007) Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 341:303–307Google Scholar
  25. Cornette J-C, Triplet P, Sournia A, Fagot C (2001) Le contrôle de la spartine en baie de Somme: contribution à la réflexion. In: Drévès L, Chaussepied M (eds) Restauration des écosystèmes côtiers. Ifremer, Brest, pp 212–229Google Scholar
  26. Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Écoscience 12:316–329Google Scholar
  27. Crooks J, Soulé ME (1996) Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Proceedings Norway/UN Conference on Alien species. Directorate for Nature Management and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, pp 39–46Google Scholar
  28. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87Google Scholar
  29. D’Antonio CM, Tunison JT, Loh RK (2000) Variation in the impact of exotic grasses on native plant composition in relation to fire across and elevation gradient in Hawaii. Aust Ecol 25:507–522Google Scholar
  30. Daehler CC, Strong DR (1996) Status, prediction and prevention of introduced cordgrass Spartina spp. invasions in Pacific Estuaries, USA. Biol Conserv 78:51–58Google Scholar
  31. Dame R (1996) Ecology of marine bivalves: an ecosystem approach. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  32. DiTomaso JM (1998) Impact, biology and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol 12:326–336Google Scholar
  33. Doody JP (1990) Spartina–friend or foe? A conservation viewpoint. In: Gray AJ, Benham PEM (eds) Spartina anglica: a research review. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Research Publication, London, pp 77–79Google Scholar
  34. Ehrenfeld JG (2011) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80Google Scholar
  35. Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9:479–486Google Scholar
  36. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasion by animals and plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Fanslow DL, Nalepa TF, Lang GA (1995) Filtration rates of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) on natural seston from Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. J Gt Lakes Res 21:489–500Google Scholar
  38. Fisher JL, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Loneragan WA (2006) Enhanced soil and leaf nutrient status of a Western Australian Banksia woodland community invaded by Ehrharta calycina and Pelargonium capitatum. Plant Soil 284:253–264Google Scholar
  39. Fisher JL, Loneragan WA, Dixon K, Delaney J, Veneklaas EJ (2009) Altered vegetation structure and composition linked to fire frequency and plant invasion in a biodiverse woodland. Biol Conserv 142:2270–2281Google Scholar
  40. Flowers JD (1991) Subtropical fire suppression in Melaleuca quinquenervia. In: Center TD, Doren RF, Hofstetter RL, Myers RL, Whiteaker LD (eds) Proceedings of the symposium on exotic pest plants, Nov. 2–4, 1988, Miami, Florida. NPS/NREVER/NRTR-91/06 technical report. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver, pp 151–158Google Scholar
  41. Freinkel S (2007) American chestnut. The life, death and rebirth of a perfect tree. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  42. Frelich LE, Hale CM, Scheu S, Holdsworth AR, Heneghan L, Bohlen PJ, Reich PB (2006) Earthworm invasion into previously earthworm-free temperate and boreal forests. Biol Invasions 8:1235–1245Google Scholar
  43. Fukami T, Wardle DA, Bellingham PJ, Mulder CPH, Towns DR, Yeates GW, Bonner KI, Durrett MS, Grant-Hoffman MN, Williamson WM (2006) Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. Ecol Lett 9:1299–1307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gassó N, Pyšek P, Vilà M, Williamson M (2010) Spreading to a limit: the time required for a neophyte to reach its maximum age. Divers Distrib 16:310–311Google Scholar
  45. Golumbia T, Brand L, Moore K, Bartier P (2007) History and current status of introduced vertebrates on Haida Gwaii. In: Gaston AJ, Golumbia TE, Martin J-L, Sharpe ST (eds) Lessons from the islands: introduced species and what they tell us about how ecosystems work. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp 8–31Google Scholar
  46. González G, Huang CY, Zou X, Rodríguez C (2006) Earthworm invasions in the tropics. Biol Invasions 8:1247–1256Google Scholar
  47. Gray AJ, Raybould AF, Brown SL (1997) The environmental impact of Spartina anglica: past, present and predicted. In: Patten K (ed) Second international Spartina conference. Washington State University, Cooperative Extension, Washington, pp 34–40Google Scholar
  48. Gundale MJ (2002) Influence of exotic earthworms on the soil organic horizon and on the rare fern Botrychium mormo. Conserv Biol 1655–1661Google Scholar
  49. Helms KR, Vinson SB (2002) Widespread associations of the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta with an invasive mealybug. Ecology 83:2425–2438Google Scholar
  50. Hofstetter RH, Sonenshein RS (1990) Vegetative changes in a wetland in the vicinity of a well field, Dade County. Fla US Geol Survey Water-Res Investigations Rep 89–4155Google Scholar
  51. Hutchings P, Saenger P (1987) Ecology of mangroves. University of Queensland Press, St. LuciaGoogle Scholar
  52. James SW, Hendrix PF (2004) Invasion of exotic earthworms into North America and other regions. In: Edwards CA (ed) Earthworm ecology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 75–88Google Scholar
  53. Jeschke JM, Strayer DL (2005) Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:7198–7202Google Scholar
  54. Johnston C, Pinay G, Arens C, Naiman R (1995) Influence of soil properties on the biogeochemistry of a beaver meadow hydro sequence. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 59:1789–1799Google Scholar
  55. Jones CG, Lawton JA, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386Google Scholar
  56. Jones CG, Lawton JA, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957Google Scholar
  57. Kennedy TA, Hobbie SE (2004) Saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima) invasion alters organic matter dynamics in a desert stream. Freshw Biol 49:65–76Google Scholar
  58. Kloot PM (1983) The role of common iceplant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum) in the deterioration of medic pastures. Aust J Ecol 8:301–306Google Scholar
  59. Kourtev PS, Zuang WZ, Ehrenfeld JG (1999) Differences in earthworm densities and nitrogen dynamics in soils under exotic and native plant species. Biol Invasions 1:237–245Google Scholar
  60. Lake JC, Leishman MR (2004) Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: The role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores. Biol Conserv 117:215–226Google Scholar
  61. Latour B (1999) Let’s not overlook the earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus. <>. Accessed 17 feb 2010
  62. Leppäkoski E (1984) Introduced species in the Baltic Sea and its coastal ecosystems. Ophelia Suppl 3:123–135Google Scholar
  63. Liebhold AM, MacDonald WL, Bergdahl D, Mastro VC (1995) Invasion by exotic forest pests: a threat to forest ecosystems. For Sci Monogr 30Google Scholar
  64. Lizarralde MS (1993) Current status of the beaver (Castor canadensis) introduced in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). Ambio 22:351–358Google Scholar
  65. Lizarralde MS, Defarrari GA, Alvarez SE, Escobar JM (1996) Effects of beaver (Castor canadensis) on the nutrient dynamics of the southern beech forest of Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). Ecología Aust 6:101–105Google Scholar
  66. Lizarralde M, Escobar J, Deferrari G (2004) Invader species in Argentina: a review about the beaver (Castor canadensis) population situation on Tierra del Fuego ecosystem. Interciencia 29:352–356Google Scholar
  67. Mack RN (2011) Cheatgrass. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 108–113Google Scholar
  68. Martin J-L, Joron M (2003) Nest predation in forest birds: influence of predator type and predator’s habitat quality. Oikos 102:641–653Google Scholar
  69. Martin J-L, Gaston AJ, Hitier S (1995) The effect of island size and isolation on old growth forest habitat and bird diversity in Gwaii Hanaas (Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada). Oikos 72:115–131Google Scholar
  70. Martin J-L, Allombert S, Gaston AJ (2007) The effects of deer and squirrels on forest birds: community structure, population density and reproduction. In: Gaston AJ, Golumbia TE, Martin J-L, Sharpe ST (eds) Lessons from the islands: introduced species and what they tell us about how ecosystems work. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp 93–99Google Scholar
  71. Martínez Pastur G, Lencinas MV, Escobar J, Quiroga P, Malmierca L, Lizarralde M (2006) Understorey succession in Nothofagus forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina) affected by Castor canadensis. Appl Veg Sci 9:143–154Google Scholar
  72. McDaniel KC, DiTomaso JM, Duncan CA (2005) Tamarisk or saltcedar, Tamarix spp. In: Clark JK, Duncan CL (eds) Assessing the economic environmental and societal losses from invasive plants on rangeland and wildlands. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, pp 198–222Google Scholar
  73. Meinesz A (1999) Killer algae: a true tale of a biological invasion. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  74. Naiman R, Melillo J, Hobbie J (1986) Ecosystem alteration of boreal forest streams by beaver (Castor canadensis). Ecology 67:1254–1269Google Scholar
  75. Naiman RJ, Johnston CA, Kelley JC (1988) Alteration of North American streams by beaver: the structure and dynamics of streams are changing as beaver recolonize their historic habitat. Bioscience 38:753–762Google Scholar
  76. Neary DG, Ryan KC, DeBano L (eds) (2005) (revised 2008). Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on soils and water. Gen Tech Report. RMRS-GTR-42-vol 4. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  77. Ness JH, Bronstein JL (2004) The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biol Invasions 6:445–461Google Scholar
  78. O’Dowd DJ, Green PT, Lake PS (2003) Invasional meltdown on an oceanic island. Ecol Lett 6:812–817Google Scholar
  79. O”Dowd DJ, Green PT (2010) Invasional meltdown: do invasive ants facilitate secondary invasions? In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abbott KL (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 271–272Google Scholar
  80. Opler PA (1978) Insects of American chestnut: possible importance and conservation concern. In: McDonald J (ed) The American chestnut symposium. West Virginia University Press, Morgantown, pp 83–85Google Scholar
  81. Orwig DA (2002) Ecosystem to regional impacts of introduced pests and pathogens: historical context, questions and issues. J Biogeogr 29:1471–1474Google Scholar
  82. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19Google Scholar
  83. Pascal M, Le Guyader H, Simberloff D (2010) Biological invasions and the conservation of biodiversity. OiE Scientific and technical review 29(2):367–403Google Scholar
  84. Pinay G, Naiman R (1991) Short-term hydrologic variations and nitrogen dynamics in beaver created meadows. Archiv für Hydrobiol 123:187–205Google Scholar
  85. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Barbour MG, Crawley MJ, Hrusa GF, Moyle PB, Randall JM, Simberloff D, Williamson M (2002) Biological invasions: politics and the discontinuity of ecological terminology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 83:131–133Google Scholar
  86. Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7:781–784Google Scholar
  87. Richardson DM, Higgins SL (1998) Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 450–473Google Scholar
  88. Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21:511–527Google Scholar
  89. Richardson DM, MacDonald IAW, Hoffmann JH, Henderson L (1997) Alien plant invasions. In: Cowling RM, Richardson DM, Pierce SM (eds) Vegetation of southern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 535–570Google Scholar
  90. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour G, Panetta FD, West CJ (2001) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107Google Scholar
  91. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant-plant interactions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  92. Rodriguez-Cabal MA, Barrios MN, Simberloff D (2009) Across island and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds (Reply). Divers Distrib15:911–912Google Scholar
  93. Rowles AD, O’Dowd DJ (2009) New mutualism for old: indirect disruption and direct facilitation of seed dispersal following Argentine ant invasion. Oecologia 158:709–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Ruesink JL, Lenihan HS, Trimble AC, Heiman KW, Micheli F, Byers JE, Kay MC (2005) Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:643–689Google Scholar
  95. Sagoff M (2005) Do non-native species threaten the natural environment? J Agric Environ Ethics 18:215–236Google Scholar
  96. Scherer-Lorenzen M, Elend A, Nöllert S, Schulze E-D (2000) Plant invasions in Germany: general aspects and impact of nitrogen deposition. In: Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 351–368Google Scholar
  97. Serbesoff-King K (2003) Melaleuca in Florida: a literature review on the taxonomy, distribution, biology, ecology, economic importance and control measures. J Aquat Plant Manag 41:98–112Google Scholar
  98. Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32Google Scholar
  99. Smith GF, Nicholas NS (2000) Size- and age-class distributions of Fraser fir following balsam woolly adelgid infestation. Can J For Res 30:948–957Google Scholar
  100. Sorensen PW, Bajer P (2011) Carp, common. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 100–104Google Scholar
  101. Specht RL, Specht A (1999) Australian plant communities: dynamics of structure growth and biodiversity. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  102. Stone CP, Taylor DD (1984) Status of feral pig management and research in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Proceedings of the Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Natural Science Conference 5:106–117Google Scholar
  103. Strayer DL (2009) Twenty years of zebra mussels: lessons from the mollusk that made headlines. Front Ecol Environ 7:135–141Google Scholar
  104. Strayer DL (2010) Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and the prospects for the future. Freshw Biol 55(Supplement 1):152–174Google Scholar
  105. Terwilliger J, Pastor J (1999) Small mammals, ectomycorrizae, and conifer succession in beaver meadows. Oikos 85:83–94Google Scholar
  106. Thompson JD (1991) The biology of an invasive plant: what makes Spartina anglica so successful? Bioscience 41:393–401Google Scholar
  107. Thorpe AS, Archer V, DeLuca TH (2006) The invasive forb, Centaurea maculosa, increases phosphorus availability in Montana grasslands. Appl Soil Ecol 23:118–122Google Scholar
  108. Turner PJ (2008) The impacts of the environmental weed Asparagus asparagoides and the ecological barriers to restoring invaded sites following biological control. PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  109. Turner PJ, Scott JK, Spafford H (2008) The ecological barriers to the recovery of bridal creeper (Asparagus asparagoides (L.) Druce) infested sites: impacts on vegetation and the potential increase in other exotic species. Aust Ecol 33:713–722Google Scholar
  110. Tyler AC, Lambrinos JG, Grosholz ED (2007) Nitrogen inputs promote the spread of an invasive marsh grass. Ecol Appl 17:1886–1898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Vitousek PM (1986) Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? In: Mooney HA, Drake JA (eds) Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer, New York, pp 163–176Google Scholar
  112. Vitousek PM (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population ecology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7–13Google Scholar
  113. Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai’i: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59:247–265Google Scholar
  114. Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whittaker LD, Mueller-Dombois D, Matson PA (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Vivrette NJ, Muller CH (1977) Mechanism of invasion and dominance of coastal grassland by Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Ecol Monogr 47:301–318Google Scholar
  116. Wade DD (1981) Some melaleuca-fire relationships including recommendations for homesite protection. In: Geiger RK (ed) Proceedings of the Melaleuca Symposium, Sept. 23–24, 1980, Edison Community College, Fort Myers. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Forestry, Tallahassee, pp 29–35Google Scholar
  117. Walsh GE (1967) An ecological study of a Hawaiian mangrove swamp. In: Lauff GH (ed) Estuaries. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, pp 420–431Google Scholar
  118. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  119. Williamson MH, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666Google Scholar
  120. Wilson EO (2005) Early ant plagues in the new world. Nature 433:32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Woodward SA, Vitousek PM, Matson K, Hughes F, Benvenuto K, Matson PA (1990) Use of the exotic tree Myrica faya by native and exotic birds in Hawai’i Volcanoes National Park. Pac Sci 44:88–93Google Scholar
  122. Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:443–466Google Scholar
  123. Worster DA (1994) Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas. Cambridge Unviersity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  124. Wright JP, Gurney WSC, Jones CG (2004) Patch dynamics in a landscape modified by ecosystem engineers. Oikos 105:336–348Google Scholar
  125. Zhu B, Fitzgerald DG, Mayer CM, Rudstam LG, Mills EL (2006) Alteration of ecosystem function by zebra mussels in Oneida Lake: impacts on submerged macrophytes. Ecosystems 9:1017–1028Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations