Biological Invasions

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1229–1240 | Cite as

Impact of herbivory on performance of Vincetoxicum spp., invasive weeds in North America

Original Paper


The alien invasive vines Vincetoxicum rossicum and Vincetoxicum nigrum (swallow-wort) are of major concern in eastern North America, where both species invade forested landscapes and threaten faunal and plant diversity. Among the few native natural enemies reported in Eurasia, the specialist chrysomelid, Chrysochus (Eumolpus) asclepiadeus (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae), feeds on Vincetoxicum both above ground (as adults) and below ground (as larvae). The goal of our study was to assess the potential for using this beetle to manage invasive Vincetoxicum spp. in North America by quantifying the impact of herbivory by C. asclepiadeus on Vincetoxicum and determining whether this effect was influenced by plant density (“Allee effect”). Experimental work was carried out using a split plot design in the field in southern France. Pots of V. nigrum and V. hirundinaria, a substitute for V. rossicum, were planted at high (255 plants/m2), medium (127 plants/m2), and low (32 plants/m2) plant densities, and received treatments of 0 (control), 2 or 4 C. asclepiadeus adult beetles/pot. Leaf damage, root and shoot biomass, and quantity of seeds were measured after 4 weeks of adult feeding. Densities of 2 and 4 beetles/pot caused similar damage, with significant reductions in plant biomass at low plant density. While V. hirundinaria increased allocation of resources to roots in response to herbivory, V. nigrum did not. Seed production was greatest for both species grown at low plant densities, but only V. nigrum produced fewer seeds in response to herbivory. Our results, based on the effects of herbivory by C. asclepiadeus adults, suggest that if this beetle were to be introduced into North America for the management of Vincetoxicum spp. such as V. rossicum, reductions in plant biomass and spread would be greatest if beetles were released on edges or in newly-established satellite populations at low plant densities. In the case of V. nigrum, beetles could be released irrespective of plant density as reproductive output and seed dispersal would be reduced similarly.


Invasive species Herbivory Plant fitness Biological control Apocynaceae 



This work was funded by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR), the USDA-ARS and supported by R. Bourchier (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada). The authors thank Olivier Simonot and Yves Garnier (USDA-ARS European Biological Control Laboratory) for field and technical assistance. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the quality of this paper.


  1. Abhilasha D, Joshi J (2009) Enhanced fitness due to higher fecundity, increased defence against a specialist and tolerance towards a generalist herbivore in an invasive annual plant. J Plant Ecol-Uk 2(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA (2000) Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. Trends Plant Sc 5(7):309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arredondo JT, Johnson DA (2009) Root responses to short-lived pulses of soil nutrients and shoot defoliation in seedlings of three rangeland grasses. Rangeland Ecol Manag 62(5):470–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Averill KM, DiTommaso A, Morris SH (2008) Response of pale swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum) to Triclopyr application and clipping. Invas Plant Sci Manag 1:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cappuccino N (2004) Allee effect in an invasive alien plant, pale swallow-wort Vincetoxicum rossicum (Asclepiadaceae). Oikos 106:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cappuccino N, Mackay R, Eisner C (2002) Spread of the invasive alien vine Vincetoxicum rossicum: Tradeoffs between seed dispersability and seed quality. Am Midl Nat 148(2):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DiTommaso A, Lawlor FM, Darbyshire SJ (2005) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 2. Cynanchum rosicum (Kleopow) Borhidi [=Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleopow) Barbar.] and Cynanchum louiseae (L.) Kartesz & Gandhi [=Vincetoxicum nigrum (L.) Moench]. Can J Plant Sci 85(1):243–263Google Scholar
  8. Dobler S, Daloze D, Pasteels JM (1998) Sequestration of plant compounds in a leaf beetle’s defensive secretion: cardenolides in Chrysochus. Chemoecology 8:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ernst CM, Cappuccino N (2005) The effect of an invasive alien vine, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Asclepiadaceae) on arthropod populations in Ontario old-field. Biol Invasions 7:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garren JM, Strauss SY (2009) Population-level compensation by an invasive thistle thwarts biological control from seed predators. Ecol Appl 19(3):709–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunter MD (2001) Out of sight, out of mind: the Impacts of root-feeding insects in natural and managed systems. Agric For Entomol 3:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jia X, Pan XY, Li B (2009) Allometric growth, disturbance regime, and dilemmas of controlling invasive plants: a model analysis. Biol Invasions 11(3):743–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A, Sardanelli S, Denno RF (2008) Constitutive and induced defenses to herbivory in above and belowground plant tissues. Ecology 89(2):392–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liede S (1997) Subtribes and genera of the tribe Asclepiadeae (Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae)–a synopsis. Taxon 46:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martinkova J, Klimesova J, Mihulka S (2008) Compensation of seed production after severe injury in the short-lived herb Barbarea vulgaris. Basic Appl Ecol 9(1):44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meekins JF, McCarthy BC (2000) Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. J Ecol 88(3):447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milbrath LR, Biazzo J, Sforza R, Berner D, Casagrande R (2006) Proposed host specificity test plant list for testing potential biological control agents of swallow-worts in North America. USDA Agricultural Research Service Research Proposal, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  18. Miller GC, Kricsfalusy V, Moleirinho P, Hayes S, Krick R (2008) Dog-strangling vine- Cynanchum rossicum (Kleopow) Borhidi: A review of distribution. ecology and control of this invasive exotic plant. Toronto Region Conservation Authority, Rouge Park DSV Report, pp 1–62Google Scholar
  19. Mullin BH, Anderson LWJ, DiTomaso JM, Eplee RE, Getsinger KD (2000) Invasive plant species. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Issue Paper 13:1–18Google Scholar
  20. Notzold R, Blossey B, Newton E (1998) The influence of belowground herbivory and plant competition on growth and biomass allocation of purple loosestrife. Oecologia 113:82–93Google Scholar
  21. R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.9.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
  22. Royall RM (1997) Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Sforza R (2009) Survey in Eurasia for collection of germplasm, natural enemies, and selection of agents for the biological control of swallow-worts (Vincetoxicum spp.) in North America. Phase I, USDA-ARS Research Final Report. Montpellier, France, pp 40Google Scholar
  24. Sheeley SE, Raynal DJ (1996) The distribution and status of species of Vincetoxicum in eastern North America. Bull Torrey Bot Club 123(2):148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith LL, DiTommaso A, Lehmann J, Greipsson S (2006) Growth and reproductive potential of the exotic invasive vine Vincetoxicum rossicum in northern New York state. Can J Bot 84:1771–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith L, DiTommaso A, Lehmann J, Greipsson S (2008) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the exotic invasive vine pale swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Invas Plant Sci Manag 1:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Snell TW, Birch DG (1975) Effects of density on resource partitioning in Chamaesyce-hirta (Euphorbiaceae). Ecology 56(3):742–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14(5):179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Taylor CM, Hastings A (2005) Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecol Lett 8:895–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tewksbury L, Casagrande R, Gassmann A (2002) Swallow-worts. In: Van Driesche R et al (eds) Biological control of pests in forests of Eastern United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002–04, pp 209–216Google Scholar
  31. van Dam NM (2009) Belowground Herbivory and Plant Defenses. Annu Rev Ecol Evol 40:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van der Meijden E, de Boer NJ, van der Veen-van WiJk CAM (2001) Pattern of storage and regrowth in ragwort. Evol Ecol 14:439–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weston LA, Barnet JN, DiTommaso A (2006) Review of the biology and ecology of three invasive perennials in New York State: Japanese knotweed (Polygonum cuspidatum), Mugwort (Arternisia vulgaris) and pale swallow-wort (Vincetoxicum rossicum). Invasive Plant Council of New York State. Retrieved 12 Oct 2009
  34. White DJ, Haber E, Keddy C (1993) Invasive plants of natural habitats in Canada: an integrated review of wetland and upland species and legislation governing their control. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, p 121Google Scholar
  35. Wilson JRU, Yeates A, Schooler S (2007) Rapid response to shoot removal by the invasive wetland plant, alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides). Environ Exp Bot 60(1):20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media (outside the USA)  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothy Maguire
    • 1
  • René Sforza
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sandy M. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.European Biological Control LaboratoryUSDA-ARSMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.USDA-ARS-EBCLSt-Gely du FescFrance

Personalised recommendations