Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1183–1194 | Cite as

Scavenging in Mediterranean ecosystems: effect of the invasive Argentine ant

  • Elena Angulo
  • Stéphane Caut
  • Xim Cerdá
Original Paper

Abstract

Above-ground invertebrates may represent a high proportion of animal biomass, but few data are available on their fate after death. In Mediterranean ant communities, they are frequently scavenged by ants. Here, we assessed the consequences of Argentine ant invasion on the removal of arthropod corpses in Doñana National Park (SW Spain). In three natural habitats that differed in their degree of vegetation cover (i.e. protection for ants against high temperatures), we experimentally provided dead Drosophila, and observed their disappearance over a 60-min period at different times of day and year. The habitats used were isolated cork oak trees, pine tree forest and dry scrubland; we compared invaded with uninvaded plots in each. Oak trees were the most invaded habitat, while scrubland was the least and the only one where the Argentine ant coexisted with native ant species. In accordance with this degree of invasion, the Argentine ant removed the highest percentage of dead flies in oak trees and the lowest in scrubland. Its performance as scavenger was higher than uninvaded ant communities, but it was reduced at high temperatures, when native species were highly efficient. The saturated distribution of the Argentine ant colony seems to be the key to its efficiency. We discuss how the occurrence and scavenger efficiency of the Argentine ant could affect the nutrient cycling and the progression of its invasion.

Keywords

Linepithema humile Doñana Temperature Ant communities Arthropod corpses 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Beatriz Estrada who provided the thousands of Drosophila needed for our experiment, to Cristina Pérez and Nicolas Guirlet for their help during field experiments, to Ana Carvajal for her help in identifying the ant species, to Raphael Boulay for comments on previous drafts, to Jessica Pearce and Bill McDowell also for their comments and English language editing, to three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions to ameliorate de ms and to José Boixo, Juan Calderón, Fernando Ibáñez and Ramón Soriguer for historic information about the presence of the Argentine ant in Doñana. Authorities of Doñana National Park gave the authorization for fieldwork. Other fieldwork facilities were provided by ICTS-RBD. This work was supported by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Consolider MONTES, CSD 2008-00040 and Juan de la Cierva contract to E. A.) and Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (JAE postdoctoral contract to S. C.).

References

  1. Angulo E, Boulay R, Rodrigo A, Retana J, Cerdá X (2007) Efecto de una especie invasora, Linepithema humile, la hormiga argentina, sobre la biodiversidad del Parque Nacional de Doñana (Huelva): descripción de las interacciones con las hormigas nativas. In: Ramírez L, Asensio B (eds) Investigación en Parques Nacionales: 2003–2006. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, pp 161–179Google Scholar
  2. Bestelmeyer B, Rios Casanova L (2010) Box 3.1. Field techniques for sampling ants. In: Lach L, Parr CL, Abott KL (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, UK, pp 39–41Google Scholar
  3. Cammell ME, Way MJ, Paiva MR (1996) Diversity and structure of ant communities associated with oak, pine, eucalyptus and arable habitats in Portugal. Insectes Soc 43:37–46. doi: 10.1007/BF01253954 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpintero S, Reyes-López J, de Reyna LA (2003) Impact of human dwellings on the distribution of the exotic Argentine ant: a case study in Doñana National Park, Spain. Biol Conserv 115:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpintero S, Reyes-López J, de Reyna LA (2005) Impact of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) on an arboreal ant community in Doñana National Park, Spain. Biodiv Conserv 14:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpintero S, Retana J, Cerdá X, Reyes-López J, de Reyna LA (2007) Exploitative strategies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and native ant species in a southern Spanish pine forest. Environ Entomol 36:1100–1111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter DO, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M (2007) Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94:12–24. doi: 10.1007/s00114-006-0159-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerdá X (2001) Behavioural and physiological traits to thermal stress tolerance in two Spanish desert ants. Etología 9:15–27Google Scholar
  9. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1998a) Prey size reverses the outcome of interference interactions of scavenger ants. Oikos 82:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1998b) Critical thermal limits in Mediterranean ant species: trade-off between mortality risk and foraging performance. Funct Ecol 12:45–55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00160.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cerdá X, Angulo E, Boulay R, Lenoir A (2009) Individual and collective foraging decisions: a field study of worker recruitment in the gypsy ant Aphaenogaster senilis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:551–562. doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0690-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crist TO (2009) Biodiversity, species interactions, and functional roles of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in fragmented landscapes: a review. Myrmecol news 12:3–13Google Scholar
  13. Cros S, Cerdá X, Retana J (1997) Spatial and temporal variations in the activity patterns of Mediterranean ant communities. Ecoscience 4:269–278Google Scholar
  14. Estany-Tigerström D, Bas JM, Pons P (2010) Does Argentine ant invasion affect prey availability for foliage-gleaning birds? Biol Invasions 12:827–839. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9504-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fellers JH (1987) Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68:1466–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fellers GM, Fellers JH (1982) Scavenging rates of invertebrates in an eastern decidous forest. Am Midl Nat 107:389–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giraud T, Pedersen JS, Keller L (2002) Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of southern Europe. PNAS 99(9):6075–6079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heller NE, Gordon DM (2006) Seasonal spatial dynamics and causes of nest movement in colonies of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Ecol Entomol 31:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller NE, Ingram KK, Gordon DM (2008) Nest connectivity and colony structure on unicolonial Argentine ants. Insect Soc 55:397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holway DA (1998) Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116:252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holway DA (2005) Edge effects of an invasive species across a natural ecological boundary. Biol Conserv 121:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Human KG, Gordon DM (1996) Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Le Breton J, Orivel J, Chazeau J, Dejean A (2007) Unadapted behaviour of native, dominant ant species during the colonization of an aggressive, invasive ant. Ecol Res 22:107–114. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0014-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menke SB, Fisher RN, Jetz W, Holway DA (2007) Biotic and abiotic controls of Argentine ant invasion success at local and landscape scales. Ecology 88:3164–3173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parmenter RR, MacMahon JA (2009) Carrion decomposition and nutrient cycling in a semiarid shrub—steppe ecosystem. Ecol Monogr 79:637–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Retana J, Cerdá X, Espadaler X (1991) Arthropod corpses in a temperate grassland: a limited supply? Hol Ecol 14:63–67Google Scholar
  28. Saks ME, Carroll CR (1980) Ant foraging activity in tropical agroecosystems. Agro-Ecosyst 6:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanders NJ, Gotelli NJ, Heller NE, Gordon DM (2003) Community disassembly by an invasive species. PNAS 100:2474–2477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437913100 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarty M, Abbott KL, Lester PJ (2007) Community level impacts of an ant invader and food mediated coexistence. Insect Soc 54:166–173. doi: 10.1007/s00040-007-0927-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SAS Inst. Inc. (2008) SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. CaryGoogle Scholar
  32. Seastedt TR, Tate CM (1981) Decomposition rates and nutrient contents of arthropod remains in forest litter. Ecology 62:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seastedt TR, Mameli L, Gridley K (1981) Arthropod use of invertebrate carrion. Am Mid Nat 105:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. StatSoft Inc. (2007) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. http://www.statsoft.com
  35. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2001) Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. PNAS 98:1095–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tillberg CV, Holway DA, LeBrun EG, Suarez AV (2007) Trophic ecology of invasive Argentine ants in their native and introduced ranges. PNAS 104:20856–20861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. von Aesch L, Cherix D (2005) Introduced ant species and mechanisms of competition on Floreana island (Galápagos, Ecuador) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 45:463–481Google Scholar
  38. Way MJ, Cammell ME, Paiva MR, Collingwood CR (1997) Distribution and dynamics of the Argentine ant Linepithema (Irydomyrmex) humile (Mayr) in relation to vegetation, soil conditions, topography and native competitor ants in Portugal. Insect Soc 44:415–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Estación Biológica de DoñanaCSICSevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations