Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 557–565 | Cite as

Disruption of ant-seed dispersal mutualisms by the invasive Asian needle ant (Pachycondyla chinensis)

  • Mariano A. Rodriguez-CabalEmail author
  • Katharine L. Stuble
  • Benoit Guénard
  • Robert R. Dunn
  • Nathan J. Sanders
Original Paper


By disrupting the structure of native ant assemblages, invasive ants can have effects across trophic levels. Most studies to date, however, have focused on the impacts just two species (Linepithema humile and Solenopsis invicta). The impacts of many other invasive ant species on ecological processes in their introduced range are unknown. In this study we tested the hypothesis that the invasive ant Pachycondyla chinensis disrupts ant-seed dispersal mutualisms by displacing native ant species, especially the keystone mutualist Aphaenogaster rudis, while failing to disperse seeds itself. In a paired design we measured the impact of P. chinensis on the native ant-plant seed dispersal mutualism. The number of A. rudis workers was 96% lower in invaded than in intact plots, and the number of seeds removed was 70% lower in these plots. Finally, in invaded plots the abundance of Hexastylis arifolia, a locally abundant myrmecochorous plant, was 50% lower than in plots where P. chinensis was absent. A parsimonious interpretation of our results is that P. chinensis causes precipitous declines in the abundance of A. rudis within invaded communities, thereby disrupting the ant-plant seed dispersal mutualisms and reducing abundances of ant-dispersed plants. In sum, the magnitude of the effects of P. chinensis on seed dispersal is quantitatively similar to that documented for the intensively studied invasive Argentine ant. We suggest that more studies on the impacts of less-studied invasive ant species on seed dispersal mutualisms may increase our knowledge of the effects of these invaders on ecosystem function.


Aphaenogaster rudis Exotic species Hexastylis arifolia Myrmecochory Seed-dispersal mutualisms 



We thank Historic Yates Mill County Park for permission to carry out field work and G. L. McCormick and J. E. Canner for assistance in the field. M. N. Barrios-Garcia, J. A. Schweitzer, J. K. Bailey and M. A. Nuñez provided advice that greatly improved this manuscript. This research was funded by the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee.


  1. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melian CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 100:9383–9387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:431–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bednar DM (2010) Pachycondyla (=Brachyponera) chinensis predation on Reticuletermes virginicus and competition with Aphaenogaster rudis. Master of science thesis, North Carolina State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE, Brandão CRF, Brown WL Jr, Delabie JHC, Silvestre R (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description, and evaluation. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washigton, pp 122–144Google Scholar
  5. Bond W, Slingsby P (1984) Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism: the Argentine ant (Iridomiyrmex humilis) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65:1031–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cain ML, Damman H (1997) Clonal growth and ramet performance in the woodland herb, Asarum canadense. J Ecol 85:883–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canner JE (2010) The population ecology of ant-dispersed plants in space and time. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney SE, Byerley MB, Holway DA (2003) Invasive Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) do not replace native ants as seed dispersers of Dendromecon rigida (Papaveraceae) in California, USA. Oecologia 135:576–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 412:635–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Culver DC, Beattie AJ (1978) Myrmecochory in Viola: dynamics of seed-ant interactions in some West Virginia species. J Ecol 66:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Culver DC, Beattie AJ (1980) The fate of Viola seeds dispersed by ants. J Bot 67:710–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damman H, Cain ML (1998) Population growth and viability analyses of the clonal woodland herb, Asarum canadense. J Ecol 86:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:63–87Google Scholar
  14. Eguchi K (2004) A survey on seed predation by omnivorous ants in the warm-temperate zone of Japan (Insecta, Hymnoptera, Formicidae). New Entomol 53:7–18Google Scholar
  15. Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fellers JH (1989) Daily and seasonal activity in woodland ants. Oecologia 78:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giladi I (2004) The role of habitat-specific demography, habitat specific dispersal, and the evolution of dispersal distances in determining current and future distributions of the ant dispersed forest herb, Hexastylis arifolia. Dissertation, University of Georgia, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Giladi I (2006) Choosing benefits or partners: a review of the evidence for the evolution of myrmecochory. Oikos 112:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert LE (1980) Food web organization and the conservation of neotropical diversity. In: Soule ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 11–33Google Scholar
  20. Gómez C, Oliveras J (2003) Can the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile Mayr) replace native ants in myrmecochory? Acta Oecol 24:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gómez C, Pons P, Bas JM (2003) Effects of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile on seed dispersal and seedling emergence of Rhamunus alaternus. Ecography 26:532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gove AD, Majer JD, Dunn RR (2007) A keystone ant species promotes seed dispersal in a “diffuse” mutualism. Oecologia 153:687–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guénard B, Dunn RR (2010) A new (old), invasive ant in the hardwood forests of Eastern North America and its potentially widespread impacts. PLoS ONE 5(7):e11614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011614
  24. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:181–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jordano P, Schupp EW (2000) Determinants of seed disperser effectiveness: the quantity component and patterns of seed rain for Prunus mahaleb. Ecol Monogr 70:591–615Google Scholar
  27. Lessard JP, Fordyce JM, Gotelli NJ, Sanders NJ (2009) Invasive ants alter the phylogenetic structure of native communities. Ecology 90:2664–2669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levine JM, Vilà M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanism underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc Royal Soc B 270:775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ (2009) Assessing ecological specialization of an ant-seed dispersal mutualism through a wide geographic range. Ecology 90:3009–3022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCoy NL (2009) The geographical mosaic of myrmecochory in a global biodiversity hotspot and the fate of myrmecochorous seeds dispersed by a keystone seed disperser. Master of science thesis, North Carolina State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. McGlynn T (1999) The worldwide transfer of ants: geographical distribution and ecological invasions. J Biogeogr 26:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGown JA (2009) The Asian Needle Ant, Pachycondyla chinensis (Emery)(Hymenoptera: Formicidae), reported from Alabama. Midsouth Entomol 2:88–89Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell CE, Turner MG, Pearson SM (2002) Effects of historical land use and forest patch size on myrmecochores and ant communities. Ecol Appl 12:1364–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ness JH (2004) Forest edges and fire ants alter the seed shadow of an ant-dispersered plant. Oecologia 138:228–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ness JH, Bronstein JL (2004) The effects of invasive ants on propective ant mutualists. Biol Invasions 6:445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ness JH, Morin DF, Giladi I (2009) Uncommon specialization in a mutualism between a temperate herbaceous plant guild and an ant: are Aphaenogaster ants keystone mutualists? Oikos 118:1793–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porter SD, Savignano DA (1990) Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 71:2095–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rey PJ, Garrido JL, Alcántara JM, Ramírez JM, Aguilera A, García L, Manzaneda AJ, Fernández R (2002) Spatial variation in ant and rodent post-dispersal predation of vertebrate-dispersed seeds. Funct Ecol 16:773–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodriguez-Cabal MA, Aizen MA, Novaro AJ (2007) Habitat fragmentation disrupts a plant-disperser mutualism in the temperate forest of South America. Biol Conserv 139:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodriguez-Cabal MA, Stuble KL, Nuñez MA, Sanders NJ (2009) Quantitative analysis of the effects of the exotic Argentine ant on seed-dispersal mutualisms. Biol Lett 5:499–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rowles AD, O’Dowd DJ (2009) New mutualism for old: indirect disruption and direct facilitation of seed dispersal following Argentine ant invasion. Oecologia 158:709–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanders NJ, Suarez AV (2010) Elton’s insights into the ecology of ant invasions: lessons learned and lessons still to be learned. In: Richardson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Blackwell, New York, pp 239–251Google Scholar
  43. Schupp EW (1993) Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals. Vetatio 107(108):15–29Google Scholar
  44. Schupp EW, Fuentes M (1995) Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and the unification of plant population ecology. Ecoscience 2:267–275Google Scholar
  45. Smith MR (1934) Ponerine ants of the genus Euponera in the United States. Ann Entomol Soc Am 27:558–564Google Scholar
  46. Stuble KL, Kirkman LK, Carroll CR (2010) Are red imported fire ants facilitators of native seed dispersal? Biol Invasions 12:1661–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stuble KL, Kirkman LK, Carrol CR, Sanders NJ (2011) Relative effects of disturbance on red imported fire ants and native ant species in a longleaf pine ecosystem. Conserv Biol 25:618–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Styrsky JD, Eubanks MD (2010) A facultative mutualism between aphids and an invasive ant increases plant reproduction. Ecol Entomol 35:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79:2041–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tardiff SE, Stanford JA (1998) Grizzly bear digging: effects on subalpine meadow plants in relation to mineral nitrogen availability. Ecology 79:2219–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Traveset A, Richardson DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vazquez DP, Aizen MA (2004) Degree distribution in plant-animal mutualistic networks: forbidden links or random interactions. Oikos 108:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vazquez DP, Simberloff D (2004) Indirect effects of an introduced ungulate on pollination and plant reproduction. Ecol Monogr 74:281–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vazquez DP, Morris WF, Jordano P (2005) Interaction frequency as surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecol Lett 8:1088–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitousek PM (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes—towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wenny DG, Levey DJ (1998) Directed seed dispersal by bellbirds in a tropical cloud forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6204–6207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yashiro T, Matsuura K, Guénard B, Terayama M, Dunn RR (2010) On the evolution of the species complex Pachycondyla chinensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae), including the origin of its invasive form and description of a new species. Zootaxa 2685:39–50Google Scholar
  58. Zelikova TJ, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ (2008) Variation in seed dispersal along an elevation gradient in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Acta Oecol 34:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zettler JA, Spira TP, Allen CR (2001) Ant–seed mutualisms: can red imported fire ants sour the relationship? Biol Conserv 101:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariano A. Rodriguez-Cabal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katharine L. Stuble
    • 1
  • Benoit Guénard
    • 2
  • Robert R. Dunn
    • 2
  • Nathan J. Sanders
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations