Biological Invasions

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 439–447 | Cite as

Differential effects of reproductive interference by an alien congener on native Taraxacum species

  • Sachiko Nishida
  • Koh-Ichi Takakura
  • Takayoshi Nishida
  • Takashi Matsumoto
  • Masahiro M. Kanaoka
Original Paper

Abstract

Reproductive interference (RI) has been suggested to play a critical role in native plant displacement by alien congeners. However, although co-existence of native and alien congeners may provide an opportunity to refute the RI hypothesis, few studies have examined such a case. Using a native Japanese dandelion, Taraxacum longeappendiculatum, and a co-existing alien congener, Taraxacum officinale, we tested the hypothesis that differences in RI by the alien between native recipient congeners explain whether a native will co-exist with or be displaced by an alien. We conducted a field survey to investigate the effects of alien relative abundance on T. longeappendiculatum seed set, and a hand-pollination experiment to identify the extent of pollen interference by the alien on T. longeappendiculatum. We compared these results with those obtained previously for another Japanese native species, Taraxacum japonicum, which was displaced by the alien. In our field survey, alien relative abundance had little effect on seed set in nearby T. longeappendiculatum, and hand-pollination with mixed pollen grains produced no substantial decrease in seed set of the native species. Model selection supported these tendencies; the effect of RI by the alien differed between the two native species. Other potential factors, such as resource competition or habitat changes, could not explain the co-existence of T. longeappendiculatum with and exclusion of T. japonicum by the alien in the same explanatory framework. Considering the consistent explanatory power, the findings suggest that RI is a critical mechanism that can determine both co-existence with and displacement of native dandelions by an alien congener.

Keywords

Reproductive interference Alien congener Distributional relationships Taraxacum 

References

  1. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ (2001) Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129:43–49. doi:10.1007/s004420100700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83:2328–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ (2005) Statistics: an introduction using R. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dinsmore SJ, White GC, Knopf FL (2002) Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival. Ecology 83:3476–3488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Bosch J, Camacho JPM (2009) A geographic selection mosaic in a generalized plant-pollinator-herbivore system. Ecol Monogr 79:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Quart Rev Biol 83:257–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hiscock SJ, Allen AM (2008) Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen-stigma interactions: the search for consensus. New Phytol 179:286–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76:633–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson DH (1999) The insignificance of statistical significance testing. J Wildlife Man 63:763–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kondo N (1988) Lessons with computer 2: a study on the distributions of alien and native dandelions. Keyaki 6:73–97 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  14. Kuboyama T, Takeda G (2000) Genomic factors responsible for abnormal morphology of pollen tubes in the interspecific cross Nicotiana tabacum × N. rustica. Sex Plant Reprod 12:333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuboyama T, Chung CS, Takeda G (1994) The diversity of interspecific pollen-pistil incongruity in Nicotiana. Sex Plant Reprod 7:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol 34:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin DA, Anderson WW (1970) Competition for pollinators between simultaneously flowering species. Am Nat 104:455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsumoto T, Takakura KI, Nishida T (2010) Alien pollen grains interfere with the reproductive success of native congener. Biol Invasions 12:1617–1626. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9574-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morita T, Menken SBJ, Sterk AA (1990) Hybridization between European and Asian dandelions (Taraxacum section Ruderalia and section Mongloica). New Phytol 114:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagoya City (2010) Statistical sketch of Nagoya (http://www.city.nagoya.jp (in Japaneses)
  21. Ogawa K (1979) Distributions of native and introduced dandelions in the Tokyo metropolitan area of Japan. In: Miyawaki A, Okuda S (eds) Vegetation und landschaft Japans. Maruzen, Tokyo, pp 415–421Google Scholar
  22. Ogawa K (2002) Alien dandelions. In: The Ecological Soceity of Japan (ed) Handbook of alien species in Japan. Chijinshokan, Tokyo, pp 192 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Ogawa K, Mototani I (1985) Invasion of the introduced dandelions and survival of the native ones in the Tokyo metropolitan area of Japan. Jpn J Ecol 33:443–452Google Scholar
  24. Ogawa K, Mototani I (1991) Land-use selection by dandelions in the metropolitan area, Japan. Ecol Res 6:233–246. doi:10.1007/BF02347125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Serizawa S (1986) Distributions of the native common yellow-flowered dandelion and introduced dandelions in Aichi prefecture. Bull Aichi Univ Educ Sci 35:139–148 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  26. Shibaike H, Okuro T, Ide M (2003) Hybrid dandelions as invasive newcomers. NIAES annual report 2001/2002:7Google Scholar
  27. Statistical Research and Training Institute, MIC (2010) Temperature, relative humidity, duration of sunshine, precipitation, frost and snow by observing stations (normal values). In: Japan Statistical Yearbook. Statistics Bureau, MIC, Tokyo. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/backdata/1431-01.htm
  28. Takakura KI, Fujii S (2010) Reproductive interference and salinity tolerance differentiate habitat use between two alien cockleburs: Xanthium occidentale and X. italicum (Compositae). Plant Ecol 206:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Takakura KI, Nishida T, Matsumoto T, Nishida S (2009) Alien dandelion reduces the seed set of a native congener through frequency-dependent and one-sided effects. Biol Invasions 11:973–981. doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9309-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Takakura KI, Nishida S, Nishida T (2010) Reproductive interference and its implications for the biogeography and ecology of plants. Bunrui 10:151–162 (in Japanese with English abstract; abstract: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110007681491)Google Scholar
  31. Takakura KI, Matsumoto T, Nishida T, Nishida S (2011) Effective range of reproductive interference exerted by an alien dandelion, Taraxacum officinale, on a native congener. J Plant Res 124:269–276. doi:10.1007/s10265-010-0368-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org
  33. Uriarte M, Canham CD, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK, Brokaw N (2005) Seedling recruitment in a hurricane-driven tropical forest: light limitation, density-dependence and the spatial distribution of parent trees. J Ecol 93:291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sachiko Nishida
    • 1
  • Koh-Ichi Takakura
    • 2
  • Takayoshi Nishida
    • 3
  • Takashi Matsumoto
    • 4
  • Masahiro M. Kanaoka
    • 5
  1. 1.The Nagoya University MuseumFuro-cho, NagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Osaka City Institute of Public Health and Environmental ScienceOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Laboratory of Insect Ecology, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKitashirakawa, KyotoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Interdisciplinary Environment, Graduate School of Human and Environmental StudiesKyoto UniversityYoshidanihonmatsu-cho, KyotoJapan
  5. 5.Graduate School of ScienceNagoya UniversityFuro-cho, NagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations