Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 1663–1672 | Cite as

The absence of genotypic diversity in a successful parthenogenetic invader

  • Mark F. DybdahlEmail author
  • Devin M. Drown
Original Paper

Abstract

Invasiveness might depend on the ability of genetically diverse populations of exotic species to adapt to novel environments, which suggests a paradox since exotic species are expected to lose genetic diversity when introduced. The apparent need for genetic diversity is particularly important for exotic species that lack bi-parental reproduction and genetic recombination. We used genetic marker studies to determine the genotypic diversity of invasive US populations of the clonal New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). We report here on a three-pronged survey of allozyme, microsatellite DNA, and mitochondrial DNA genetic markers of invasive populations with a focus on the western US. Combining the three types of genetic markers, we discovered four distinct genotypes of P. antipodarum. These results show that only one genotype (US 1) occupied the vast majority of the western US range, and a second occurred in the Great Lakes in the eastern US (US 2). Two other genotypes occurred in the western US (US 1a and US 3), but were restricted to populations near the presumed source of invasion in the middle Snake River, ID. These results suggest that P. antipodarum spread across a broad geographic range in the western US from a single introduced source population, and that the populations are comprised of a single clonal lineage.

Keywords

Genetic diversity Biological invasions Invasiveness Evolvability Parthenogenesis Potamopyrgus antipodarum 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Angie Kotchetova, Kendra Lyons, Jennifer Thorson, and Jonathan Finger for help with molecular genotyping, and people too numerous to mention for collecting and sending specimens. Funding was provided by NSF DEB 0296049 and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

References

  1. Amsellam L, Noyer JL, Le Bourgeois T, Hossaert-McKey M (2000) Comparison of genetic diversity in the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Mol Ecol 9:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 147–168Google Scholar
  3. Barrett SCH, Colautti RJ, Eckert CC (2008) Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Mol Ecol 17:373–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeWalt SJ, Hamrick JL (2004) Genetic variation of introduced Hawaiian and native Costa Rican populations of an invasive tropical shrub, Clidemia hirta (Melastomataceae). Am J Bot 91:1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drown DM, Levri EP, Dybdahl MF (2010) Invasive genotypes are opportunistic specialists not general purpose genotypes. Evol Appl (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Dybdahl MF, Kane SL (2005) Adaptation versus environmental tolerance in the success of a clonal invader. Ecology 86:1592–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dybdahl MF, Lively CM (1995) Diverse, endemic, and polyphyletic clones in mixed populations of a freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum. J Evol Biol 8:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dybdahl MF, Lively CM (1996) The geography of coevolution: comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50:2264–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dybdahl MF, Lively CM (1998) Host-parasite coevolution: evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution 52:1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Facon B, Pointier J, Jarne P, Sarda V, David P (2008) High genetic variance in life-history strategies within invasive populations by way of multiple introductions. Curr Biol 18:363–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox JA, Dybdahl MF, Jokela J, Lively CM (1996) Genetic structure of coexisting sexual and clonal subpopulations in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Evolution 50:1541–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frankham R (2005) Resolving the genetic paradox of invasive species. Heredity 94:385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia-Ramos G, Rodriguez D (2002) Evolutionary speed of species invasion. Evolution 56:661–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grapputo A, Boman S, Lindstrom L, Lyytinen A, Mappes J (2005) The voyage of an invasive species across continents: genetic diversity of North American and European Colorado potato beetle populations. Mol Ecol 14:4207–4219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall RO, Tank J, Dybdahl MF (2003) Exotic snails dominate nitrogen and carbon cycling in a highly productive stream. Front Ecol Environ 1:407–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall RO, Dybdahl MF, Vanderloop M (2006) Invasive species and energy flow: extremely high secondary production of introduced snails in rivers. Ecol Appl 16:1121–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauser L, Carvalho GR, Hughes RN, Carter RE (1992) Clonal structure of the introduced freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Prosobranchia: Hydrobiidae), as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Proc R Soc Lond 249:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hershler R, Liu HP, Clark WH (2010) Microsatellite evidence of invasion and rapid spread of divergent New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) clones in the Snake River basin, Idaho, USA. Biol Invasions 12:1521–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L (2000) Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287:308–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes S (1998) STRand nucleic acid analysis software. Regents of the University of California, Davis (http://www.vgl.uc-davis.edu/STRand)
  23. Jokela J, Dybdahl MF, Lively CM (1999) Habitat-specific variation in life-history traits, clonal population structure, and parasitism in a freshwater snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). J Evol Biol 12:350–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jokela J, Lively CM, Dybdahl MF, Fox. JA (2003) Genetic variation in sexual and clonal lineages of a freshwater snail. Biol J Linnean Soc 79:165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerans BL, Dybdahl MF, Gangloff MM, Jannot JE (2005) Macroinvertebrate assemblages and the New Zealand mud snail, a recent invader to streams of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolbe JJ et al (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431:177–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:3883–3888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17(8):386–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee CE, Remfert JL, Gelembiuk GW (2003) Evolution of physiological tolerance and performance during freshwater invasions. Integr Comp Biol 43:439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee CE, Remfert JL, Chang Y-M (2007) Response to selection and evolvability of invasive populations. Genetica 129:179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee CE, Gelembiuk GW (2008) Evolutionary origins of invasive populations. Evol Appl 1:427–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lockwood JL, Casey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maron JL, Vila` M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S, Beardsley P (2004) Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol Monogr 74: 261–280Google Scholar
  34. Mergeay J, Verschuren D, De Meester L (2006) Invasion of an asexual water flea clone throughout Africa and rapid displacement of a native sibling species. Proc R Soc B 273:2839–2844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muller-Scharer H, Schafner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19:417–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neiman M, Lively CM (2004) Pleistocene glaciation is implicated in the phylogeographical structure of Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a New Zealand snail. Mol Ecol 13:3085–3098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ponder WF (1988) Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a molluscan colonizer of Europe and Australia. J Mulluscan Stud 54:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Proctor T, Kerans B, Clancey P, Ryce E, Dybdahl M, Gustafson D, Hall R, Pickett F, Richards D, Waldeck RD, Chapman J, Wiltshire RH, Becker D, Anderson M, Pitman B, Lassuy D, Heimowitz P, Dwyer P, Levri EP (2007) National management and control plan for the New Zealand Mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). US Fish and Wildlife Service Report. www.anstaskforce.gov/Documents/NZMS_MgmtControl_Final.pdf Accessed 27 July 2010
  39. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:981–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:2445–2449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ (2006) Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett 9(5):615–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stadler T, Frye M, Neiman M, Lively CM (2005) Mitochondrial haplotypes and the New Zealand origin of clonal European Potamopyrgus, an invasive aquatic snail. Mol Ecol 14(8):2465–2473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tepolt CK, Darling JA, Bagley MJ, Geller JB, Blum MJ, Grosholz ED (2009) European green crabs (Carcinus maenas) in the northeast Pacific: genetic evidence for high population connectivity and current-mediated expansion from a single introduced source population. Divers Distrib 15:997–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wallace C (1992) Parthenogenesis, sex and chromosomes in Potamopyrgus. J Molluscan Stud 58:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex-100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Weetman D, Hauser L, Carvalho GR (2001) Isolation and characterization of di- and trinucleotide microsatellites in the freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum. Mol Ecol Notes 1:185–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weetman D, Hauser L, Carvalho GR (2002) Reconstruction of microsatellite mutation history reveals a strong and consistent deletion bias in invasive clonal snails, Potamopyrgus antipodarum. Genetics 162:813–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zaranko DT, Farara DG, Thompson FG (1997) Another exotic Mollusk in the Laurentian Great Lakes: the New Zealand native Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gray 1843) (Gastropoda, Hydrobiidae). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:809–814Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations