Biological Invasions

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 757–768 | Cite as

Linear and non-linear impacts of a non-native plant invasion on soil microbial community structure and function

Original Paper


Biological invasions can alter ecosystem functions such as litter decomposition and nutrient cycling, but little is known about how invader abundance influences the impact on the ecosystem. It is often assumed that impacts are proportional to invasion density, but this assumption has never been tested and has little justification. We tested the hypothesis that the microbial community structure and function of a mixed hardwood forest soil changed after invasion by Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii), an invasive shrub commonly found in eastern hardwood forests, and that changes were proportional to the density of invasion. We constructed microcosms with mixtures of native and invasive leaf litter, and measured microbial community structure (phospholipid fatty acids) and function (litter decomposition). Decomposition was linearly related to the degree of invasion (R2 = 0.945), but the ratio of bacteria to fungi exhibited a strongly non-linear, threshold response (R2 = 0.513). These results indicate that impacts of Japanese barberry invasion are not always proportional to invasion density. This finding has implications for the study of biological invasions as well as practical implications for the management of exotic invasive species.


Invasive plants Abundance Impact Density dependence Nonlinear dynamics Litter decomposition Phospholipid fatty acids Soil microbial community Berberis thunbergii 



We thank Dr. Peter Morin for the use of his laboratory incubator, Drs. Max Häggblom and Shen Yu for help with the PLFA analysis, Ai Wen for help in the field and lab, and Cathleen McFadden for elemental analysis. The manuscript was improved by helpful comments from Johannes Knops, members of the Joan Ehrenfeld and Julie Lockwood labs, and two anonymous reviewers. Funding for this research was provided by a National Science Foundation grant to J.G.E. (DEB-0309047) and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to K.J.E.


  1. Balser TC, Firestone MK (2005) Linking microbial community composition and soil processes in a California annual grassland and mixed-conifer forest. Biogeochemistry 73:395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardgett RD, McAlister E (1999) The measurement of soil fungal: bacterial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate meadow grasslands. Biol Fertil Soils 29:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardgett RD, Lovell RD, Hobbs PJ, Jarvis SC (1999) Seasonal changes in soil microbial communities along a fertility gradient of temperate grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1021–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardgett RD, Yeates GW, Anderson JM (2005) Patterns and determinants of soil biological diversity. In: Bardgett RD, Usher MB, Hopkins DW (eds) Biological diversity and function in soils. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 411Google Scholar
  5. Berg B, McClaugherty C (2008) Plant litter. Decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle SA, Yarlwood RR, Bottomley P, Myrold D (2008) Bacterial and fungal contributions to soil nitrogen cycling under Douglas fir and red alder at two sites in Oregon. Soil Biol Biochem 40:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley K, Drijber RA, Knops JMH (2006) Increased N availability in grassland soils modifies their microbial communities and decreases the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1583–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brant JB, Myrold DD, Sulzman EW (2006) Root controls on soil microbial community structure in forest soils. Oecologia 148:650–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner K, Karig DK, Weiss R, Arnold FH (2007) Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17300–17304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown PR, Huth NI, Banks PB, Singleton GR (2007) Relationship between abundance of rodents and damage to agricultural crops. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman DC (2008) From peds to paradoxes: linkages between soil biota and their influences on ecological processes. Soil Biol Biochem 40:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cotrufo MF, Del Galdo I, Piermatteo D (2009) Litter decomposition: concepts, methods and future perspectives. In: Kutsch WL, Bahn M, Heinemeyer A (eds) Soil carbon dynamics: an integrated methodology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 76–90Google Scholar
  13. Crooks J (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demoling F, Nilsson LO, Bååth E (2008) Bacterial and fungal response to nitrogen fertilization in three coniferous forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 40:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doak DF, Estes JA, Halpern BS, Jacob U, Lindberg DR, Lovvorn J, Monson DH, Tinker MT, Williams TM, Wootton JT, Carroll I, Emmerson M, Micheli F, Novak M (2008) Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable? Ecology 89:952–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrenfeld J (1999) Structure and dynamics of populations of Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii DC.) in deciduous forests of New Jersey. Biol Invasions 1:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrenfeld J, Kourtev P, Huang W (2001) Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecol Appl 11:1287–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehrenfeld J, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant–soil system. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:75–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grayston SJ, Prescott CE (2005) Microbial communities in forest floors under four tree species in coastal British Columbia. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1157–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Habekost M, Eisenhauer N, Scheu S, Steinbeiss S, Weigelt A, Gleixner G (2008) Seasonal changes in the soil microbial community in a grassland plant diversity gradient four years after establishment. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2588–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Högberg MN, Bååth E, Nordgren A, Arnebrant K, Högberg P (2003) Contrasting effects of nitrogen availability on plant carbon supply to mycorrhizal fungi and saprotrophs—a hypothesis based on field observations in boreal forest. New Phytol 160:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Högberg MN, Chen Y, Högberg P (2007) Gross nitrogen mineralisation and fungi-to-bacteria ratios are negatively correlated in boreal forests. Biol Fertil Soils 44:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M (2003) Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition? Oecologia 137:578–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsieh C, Glaser SM, Lucas AJ, Sugihara G (2005) Distinguishing random environmental fluctuations from ecological catastrophes for the North Pacific Ocean. Nature 435:336–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulme PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keith AM, Brooker RW, Osler GHR, Chapman SJ, Burslem DFRP, Van Der Wal R (2009) Strong impacts of belowground tree inputs on soil nematode trophic composition. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1060–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenis M, Auger-Rozenberg M, Roques A, Timms L, Péré C, Cock MJW, Settele J, Augustin S, Lopez-Vaamonde C (2009) Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol Invasions 11:21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kourtev P, Ehrenfeld J, Huang W (2002) Enzyme activities during litter decomposition of two exotic and two native plant species in hardwood forests of New Jersey. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1207–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kourtev P, Ehrenfeld J, Häggblom M (2003) Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 35:895–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kulmatiski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM (2008) Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol Lett 11:980–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lau JA, Strauss SY (2005) Insect herbivores drive important indirect effects of exotic plants on native communities. Ecology 86:2990–2997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LeMaitre DC, VanWilgen BW, Chapman RA, McKelly DH (1996) Invasive plants and water resources in the Western Cape Province, South Africa: modelling the consequences of a lack of management. J Appl Ecol 33:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li WH, Zhang CB, Jiang HB, Xin GR, Yang ZY (2006) Changes in soil microbial community associated with invasion of the exotic weed, Mikania micrantha HBK. Plant Soil 281:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li W, Zhang C, Gao G, Zan Q, Yang Z (2007) Relationship between Mikania micrantha invasion and soil microbial biomass, respiration and functional diversity. Plant Soil 296:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liebhold AM, Simons EE, Sior A, Unger JD (1993) Forecasting defoliation caused by the gypsy moth from field measurements. Environ Entomol 22:26–32Google Scholar
  38. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2007) Invasion ecology. Blackwell Publishing, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore-Kucera J, Dick RP (2008) Application of 13C-labeled litter and root materials for in situ decomposition studies using phospholipid fatty acids. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2485–2493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mutabaruka R, Hairiah K, Cadisch G (2007) Microbial degradation of hydrolysable and condensed tannin polyphenol-protein complexes in soils from different land-use histories. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1479–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Myrold D, Posavatz NR (2007) Potential importance of bacteria and fungi in nitrate assimilation in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1737–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nava-Camberos U, Riley DG, Harris MK (2001) Density-yield relationships and economic injury levels for Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in cantaloupe in Texas. J Econ Entomol 94:180–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Donnell AG, Colvan SR, Malosso E, Supaphol S (2005) Twenty years of molecular analysis of bacterial communities in soils and what have we learned about function? In: Bardgett RD, Usher MB, Hopkins DW (eds) Biological diversity and function in soils. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 44–56Google Scholar
  44. Ohtonen R, Fritze H, Pennanen T, Jumpponen A, Trappe J (1999) Ecosystem properties and microbial community changes in primary succession on a glacier forefront. Oecologia 119:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2009) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.15-4.
  46. Parker I, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva P, Williamson M, von Holle B, Moyle P, Byers J, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parsons K, Quiring D, Piene H, Moreau G (2005) Relationship between balsam fir sawfly density and defoliation in balsam fir. For Ecol Manage 205:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paterson E, Osler G, Dawson LA, Gebbing T, Sim A, Ord B (2008) Labile and recalcitrant plant fractions are utilized by distinct microbial communities in soil: independent of the presence of roots and mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1103–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peters DPC, Pielke RA, Bestelmeyer BT, Allen CD, Munson-McGee S, Havstad KM (2004) Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15130–15135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poché RM, Mian MY, Haque ME, Sultana P (1982) Rodent damage and burrowing characteristics in Bangladesh wheat fields. J Wildl Manage 46:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pollierer MM, Langel R, Körner C, Maraun M, Scheu S (2007) The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. Ecol Lett 10:729–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  54. Reinhart K, Packer A, Van der Putten W, Clay K (2003) Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecol Lett 6:1046–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ricciardi A (2003) Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshw Biol 48:972–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robertson GP, Wedin D, Groffman PM, Blair JM, Holland EA, Nadelhoffer K, Harris D (1999) Soil carbon and nitrogen availability. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 258–271Google Scholar
  57. Romani AM, Fischer H, Mille-Lindblom C, Tranvik LJ (2006) Interactions of bacteria and fungi on decomposing litter: differential extracellular enzyme activities. Ecology 87:2559–2569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rothe A, Binkley D (2001) Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 31:1855–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rousk J, Bååth E (2007) Fungal and bacterial growth in soil with plant materials of different C/N ratios. FEMS Microb Ecol 62:258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simberloff D (2009) We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biol Invasions 11:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, Batten KM (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strayer DL, Eviner V, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:645–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Strickland MS, Lauber C, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2009) Testing the functional significance of the microbial community composition. Ecology 90:441–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Vitousek P, Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai’i: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. White DC, Ringelberg DB (1998) Signature lipid biomarker analysis. In: Burlage RS, Atlas A, Stahl D, Geesey G, Sayler G (eds) Techniques in microbial ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 255Google Scholar
  66. White DC, Davis WM, Nickels JS, King JD, Bobbie RJ (1979) Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate. Oecologia 40:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:443–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yokomizo H, Possingham HP, Thomas MB, Buckley YM (2009) Managing the impact of invasive species: the value of knowing the density-impact curve. Ecol Appl 19:376–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Zeller B, Colin-Belgrand M, Dambrine E, Martin F, Bottner P (2000) Decomposition of N-15-labelled beech litter and fate of nitrogen derived from litter in a beech forest. Oecologia 123:550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zelles L (1999) Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biol Fertil Soils 29:111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural ResourcesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Program in Ecology & EvolutionRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations