Biological Invasions

, Volume 12, Issue 12, pp 3961–3971 | Cite as

Pinus contorta invasion in the Chilean Patagonia: local patterns in a global context

  • Bárbara LangdonEmail author
  • Aníbal Pauchard
  • Mauricio Aguayo
Original Paper


Alien conifer invasions are affecting ecosystems across the globe, but until recently, reports of such invasions in South America were scarce. Pinus contorta was first established in Chilean Patagonia for erosion control caused by historical fires and cattle farming. Recently, the species has been planted over large areas for commercial purposes. It is well adapted to local conditions and is now spreading into natural areas. This study analyzes natural regeneration of Pinus contorta around Coyhaique city, Chile, to determine the spatial patterns of invasion. Five study sites were selected, four with grasslands dominated by exotic species and one site in the steppe. In each site, the plantation (seed source) was characterized using morphological attributes and density. Regeneration, density, height and age at different distances from the seed source were recorded, and ground cover was measured as an environmental factor influencing the invasion process. A comparative analysis was also conducted between the situation in Chile and other countries affected by P. contorta invasion. In Chile, P. contorta regeneration is significantly influenced by distance from the seed source. Higher densities are found close to the parent stand (up to 13,222 trees ha−1), decreasing as distance from the seed source increases. Age and height structure indicate that the invasion process is at an early stage, and this offers a unique opportunity to study the process of invasion and to monitor it over time. In order to preserve the distinctiveness of Patagonian ecosystem, decisive action is required to control invasive conifers, with P. contorta as the number one priority. Relative to control, there is much that can be learnt from the experiences of other countries, such as New Zealand.


Biological invasions Pinus contorta Pine invasion Patagonia Chile 



Funding provided by FONDECYT 1070511, ICM P05-002, PFB-23 and “Proyectos Fortalecimiento CIEP”. We thank Nick Ledgard, Eduardo Peña, Peter Raal, Alex Fajardo and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable inputs. This work was conducted in the Laboratorio de Invasiones Biológicas (LIB).


  1. Benecke U (1967) The weed potential of Lodgepole pine. Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute 13:36–43Google Scholar
  2. CONAF-CONAMA-BIRF (1999) Catastro y Evaluación de Recursos Vegetacionales de Chile. Informe Nacional con Variables ambientales. Corporación Nacional Forestal, Santiago de ChileGoogle Scholar
  3. Despain DG (2001) Dispersion ecology of Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) in its native environment as related to Swedish forestry. For Ecol Manage 141:59–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DGAC (2009) (Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil) Dirección Meteorológica de Chile. Climas de Chile. Accesed 26 May 2009
  5. Elfving B, Ericsson T, Rosvall O (2001) The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden—a review. For Ecol Manage 141:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelmark O, Sjöberg K, Andersson B, Rosvall O, Agren GI, Baker WL, Barklund P, Björkman C, Despain DG, Elfving B, Ennos RA, Karlman M, Knecht MF, Knight DH, Ledgard NJ, Lindelöw A, Nilsson C, Peterken GF, Sörlin S, Sykes MT (2001) Ecological effects and management aspects of an exotic tree species: the case of lodgepole pine in Sweden. For Ecol Manage 141:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gobierno Regional de Aysén (2005) Ministerio de Planificación y Cooperación (SERPLAC XI) and Sociedad Alemana para la Cooperación Técnica (GTZ) Atlas de la Región de Aysén. Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
  8. Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M, Rost TL (2002) Toward a casual explanation of plant Invasiveness: seedling growth and life- history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) Species. Am Nat 159:396–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haysom KA, Murphy ST (2003) The status of invasiveness of forest tree species outside their natural habitat: a global review and discussion paper. Forest Health and Biosecurity. Working Papers. FAO, Forestry DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  10. Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1998) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: modelling interactions between organism, environment and disturbance. Plant Ecol 135:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgins SI, Richardson DM (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Am Nat 153:464–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Instituto Forestal (INFOR) (2007) Superficie de Plantaciones Forestales Región de Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo. Accesed: 27 May 2009
  13. Ledgard N (1988) The spread of introduced trees in New Zeland’s rangelands- South Island high country experience. J Tussock Grassl Mt Lands Inst Rev 44:1–8Google Scholar
  14. Ledgard N (2001) The spread of Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 141:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ledgard N (2003) What’s wrong with wilding trees? N Z Tree Grower 24(1):18–19Google Scholar
  16. Ledgard N (2004) Wilding conifers—New Zealand history and research background. In: Hill RI, Zydenbos SM, Bezar CM (eds) “Managing wilding conifers in New Zealand—present and future”. pp 1–25Google Scholar
  17. Löewe V, Murillo P (2001) Estudio de ensayo de introducción de especies. INFOR. Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
  18. Lotan JE, Critchfield WB (1990) Pinus contorta Dougl. ex. Loud. Lodgepole Pine. In: Burns, RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America. USDA Forest Service and Agriculture Handbook 654(1):302–315Google Scholar
  19. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz F (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Issues Ecol 5:1–25Google Scholar
  20. Pauchard A, Shea K (2006) Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across spatial scales. Biol Invas 8:399–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peña E, Pauchard A (2001) Coníferas introducidas en áreas protegidas: un riesgo para la biodiversidad. Bosque Nativo 30:3–7Google Scholar
  22. Peña E, Langdon A, Pauchard A (2007) Árboles exóticos naturalizados en el bosque nativo chileano. Bosque Nativo 40:3–7Google Scholar
  23. Peña E, Hidalgo M, Langdon B, Pauchard A (2008) Patterns of spread of Pinus contorta Douglex Loud in a Natural Reserve in southern South America. For Ecol Manag 256:1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peterken GF (2001) Ecological effects of introduced tree species in Britain. For Ecol Manag 141:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecol 77:1655–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richardson DM (2001) Plant invasions. In: Levin S (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 677–688Google Scholar
  27. Richardson DM (2006) Pinus: a model group for unlocking the secrets of alien plant invasions? Preslia 78:375–388Google Scholar
  28. Richardson DM, Bond WJ (1991) Determinants of plant distribution: evidence from pine invasions. Am Nat 137:639–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson DM, Higgins SI (1998) Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 450–473Google Scholar
  30. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2004) Invasive conifers: a global survey and predictive framework. Diversity Distrib 10:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasion in the southern hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21:511–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson DM, van Wilgen BW, Nunez M (2008) Alien conifer invasions in South America–short fuse burning? Biol Inv 10:573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarasola M, Rusch V, Schlichter T, Ghersa C (2006) Invasión de coníferas forestales en áreas de estepa y bosques de ciprés de la cordillera en la región Andino Patagónica. Austral Ecol 16:143–156Google Scholar
  34. Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ, Pauchard A, Richardson DM, Sarasola M, van Wilgen BW, Zalba SM, Zenni RD, Bustamante R, Peña E, Ziller SR (2010) Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecology (in press) doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02058.x
  35. Wardrop TN (1964) Reconnaissance survey of the occurrence of Pinus contorta on the Waiouru Military Reserve. Forest Manual Report N° 1, Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand p 31Google Scholar
  36. Weston GC (1957) Exotic forest trees in New Zealand. New Zealand Forest Service Bulletin N° 13, Wellington, New Zealand p 104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bárbara Langdon
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Aníbal Pauchard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mauricio Aguayo
    • 4
    • 3
  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias ForestalesUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  2. 2.Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB)SantiagoChile
  3. 3.Centro de Investigación en Ecosistemas de la Patagonia (CIEP)CoyhaiqueChile
  4. 4.Centro de Ciencias Ambientales EULA-ChileUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile

Personalised recommendations