Biological Invasions

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 1491–1497 | Cite as

A new colony structure of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in Southern Europe

  • O. Blight
  • M. Renucci
  • A. Tirard
  • J. Orgeas
  • E. Provost
Original Paper


The Argentine ant (Linepithema humile, Mayr) is a highly invasive species that has successfully spread from its native range in South America across many zones of the globe. In Southern Europe, two continental supercolonies have been identified, the Catalonian supercolony and the main European supercolony spreading over 6,000 km. In Corsica, a French Mediterranean island, the Argentine ant has been present for 60 years. Here we compare patterns of intraspecific aggression and cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Argentine ants in Corsica to three mainland European colonies. Chemical analyses reveal the existence of cuticular signature variations among the six study sites relative to a gradient of aggression. We find two distinct colony groups not belonging to the Catalonian supercolony, suggesting that the new population originates either (1) from an independent introduction event from the native range resulting in a third European supercolony, or (2), given the chemical proximity and the moderate level of aggression between the two groups, from an existing European population followed by a drift producing a division within the main European supercolony.


Corsica Linepithema humile Supercolonies Intraspecific aggression Chemical analyses 



We thank Crisanto Gomez and Silvia Abril for their field help. This manuscript has been significantly improved by the constructive comments of the editor and anonymous reviewers. This project is supported by the Office de l’Environnement de la Corse and the Direction Régional de l’Environnement Corse.


  1. Bernard F (1960) Fourmis récoltées en Corse par J Bonfils (1957). C R Somm Séanc Soc Biogeogr 36:108–114Google Scholar
  2. Blight O, Orgeas J, Renucci M, Tirard A, Provost E (2009) Where and how Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) spreads in Corsica? CR Biologies 332:747–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt M, Van Wilgenburg E, Tsutsui ND (2009) Global-scale analyses of chemical ecology and population genetics in the invasive Argentine ant. Mol Ecol 18:997–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buczkowski G, Bennett GW (2008) Aggressive interactions between the introduced Argentine ant, Linepithema humile and the native odorous house ant, Tapinoma sessile. Biol Invas 10:1001–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giraud T, Pedersen JS, Keller L (2002) Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of Southern Europe. PNAS 99(9):6075–6079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaquiéry J, Vogel V, Keller L (2005) Multilevel genetic analyses of two European supercolonies of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Mol Ecol 14:589–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pedersen JS, Krieger MJB, Vogel V, Giraud T, Keller L (2006) Native supercolonies of unrelated individuals in the invasive Argentine ant. Evolution Int J org Evolution 60(4):782–791Google Scholar
  9. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J (2003) Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insect Soc 50:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. StatSoft France (2001) Statistica v.6 pour Windows StatSoft France, Charenton-le-PontGoogle Scholar
  11. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2001) Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: insights from Argentine ants. PNAS 98:1095–1100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Suarez AV, Holway DA, Liang D, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ (2002) Spatiotemporal patterns of intraspecific aggression in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim Behav 64:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sunamura E, Espadaler X, Sakamoto H, Suzuki S, Terayama M, Tatsuki S (2009) Intercontinental union of Argentine ants: behavioral relationships among introduced populations in Europe, North America, and Asia. Insect Soc 56:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. PNAS 97:5948–5953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Grosberg RK (2003) Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. PNAS 100:1078–1083CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vega SJ, Rust MK (2001) The Argentine ant: a significant invasive species in agricultural, urban and natural environment. Sociobiology 37:3–25Google Scholar
  17. Wetterer JK, Wetterer AL (2006) A disjunct Argentine ant metacolony in Macaronesia and Southwestern Europe. Biol Invas 8:1123–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson EO (1971) The Insect Societies. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Blight
    • 1
  • M. Renucci
    • 2
  • A. Tirard
    • 2
  • J. Orgeas
    • 1
  • E. Provost
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut Méditerranéen d’Ecologie et de Paléoécologie (UMR CNRS/IRD), Université Paul CézanneAix-Marseille Université (Paul Cézanne)Aix-en-Provence cedex 4France
  2. 2.Institut Méditerranéen d’Ecologie et de Paléoécologie (UMR CNRS/IRD), Université Paul CézanneCNRS, UMR 6116-Aix-Marseille UniversitéAix-en-Provence cedex 4France

Personalised recommendations