Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 125–131 | Cite as

Towards the successful control of the invasive Pseudorasbora parva in the UK

  • John Robert Britton
  • Gareth D. Davies
  • Matt Brazier
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to detail a control programme of the invasive Asian cyprinid fish Pseudorasbora parva in the UK that was initiated in March 2005. Described as Europe’s most invasive fish, P. parva presents a risk to native fishes through the transmission of a novel pathogen and undesirable impacts arising from processes including increased inter-specific competition. Populations have been recorded in 32 UK waters since their first recording outside of aquaculture in 1996; the majority are lakes <5 ha used for recreational angling in England. The aims of the control programme were to develop a basic evaluation framework that assesses populations by risk (high, medium and low), determine commensurate management actions according to that risk and then execute those actions. For populations assessed as ‘high-risk’, for example those that could result in P. parva dispersal into a river catchment, eradication was determined as the commensurate management action and six operations have since been completed, principally using rotenone, and all have been successful to date. For P. parva populations in sites evaluated as lower risk, techniques such as biomanipulation were determined as more appropriate actions and have been used to successfully reduce their abundance by >99%. To date, the total direct cost of this programme of sustained and on-going P. parva control is approximately £190,000.

Keywords

Eradication Evaluation framework Risk assessment Topmouth gudgeon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all Environment Agency staff involved in the Pseudorasbora parva control programme. The views expressed are those of the authors and not their parent organisations.

References

  1. Allen Y, Kirby S, Copp GH, Brazier M (2006) Toxicity of rotenone to topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva for eradication of this non-native species from a tarn in Cumbria, England. Fish Manag Ecol 13:337–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00499.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen MC, Adams H, Hope B, Powell M (2004) Risk assessment for invasive species. Risk Anal 24:787–793. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00478.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bremner A, Park K (2007) Public attitudes to the management of invasive non-native species in Scotland. Biol Conserv 139:306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britton JR, Brazier M (2006) Eradicating the invasive topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva from a recreational fishery in Northern England. Fish Manag Ecol 13:329–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2006.00510.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britton JR, Davies GD, Brazier M, Pinder AC (2007) A case study on the population ecology of a topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva population in the UK and the implications for native fish communities. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 17:749–759. doi: 10.1002/aqc.809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton JR, Davies GD, Brazier M, Chare S (2008) Case studies on eradicating the Asiatic cyprinid Pseudorasbora parva from fishing lakes in England to prevent their riverine dispersal. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 18:867–876. doi: 10.1002/aqc.919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cacho OJ, Spring D, Phelong P, Hester S (2006) Evaluating the feasibility of eradicating an invasion. Biol Invasions 8:903–917. doi: 10.1007/s10530-005-4733-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Copp GH, Garthwaite R, Gozlan RE (2005) Risk identification and assessment of non-native freshwater fishes: a summary of concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. J Appl Ichthyol 21:371–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Defra (2005) Standard methodology to assess the risks from non-native species considered possible problems to the environment. http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/resprog/findings/non-native-risks/index.htm. Accessed 01/09/08
  10. Defra (2007) The invasive, non-native species framework strategy for Great Britain: protecting our natural heritage from invasive species. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Finnoff D, Shogrena JF, Leung B, Lodge D (2007) Take a risk: preferring prevention over control of biological invaders. Ecol Econ 62:216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser RW, Cook DC, Mumford JD, Wilby A, Waage JK (2006) Managing outbreaks of invasive species: eradication versus suppression. Int J Pest Manag 52:261–268. doi: 10.1080/09670870600795930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Genovesi P (2005) Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: a review. Biol Invasions 7:127–133. doi: 10.1007/s10530-004-9642-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Genovesi P, Shine C (2003) European strategy on invasive alien species. Nature and Environment, No. 137. Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  15. Gozlan RE, Pinder AC, Shelley J (2002) Occurrence of the Asiatic cyprinid Pseudorasbora parva in England. J Fish Biol 61:298–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01755.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gozlan RE, St-Hilaire S, Feist SW, Martin P, Kent ML (2005) An emergent infectious disease threatens European fish biodiversity. Nature 435:1046. doi: 10.1038/4351046a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hickley P, Chare S (2004) Fisheries for non-native species in England and Wales: angling or the environment. Fish Manag Ecol 11:203–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00395.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IUCN (2000) Guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by Alien Invasive Species. IUCN, Council of The World Conservation Union, Gland Switzerland, February 2000 (http://iucn.org/)
  19. Lorvelec O, Pascal M (2005) French attempts to eradicate non-indigenous mammals and their consequences for native biota. Biol Invasions 7:135–140. doi: 10.1007/s10530-004-9643-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Londsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manchester SJ, Bullock J (2000) The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. J Appl Ecol 37:845–864. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00538.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meadows BS (1973) Toxicity of rotenone to some species of coarse fish and invertebrates. J Fish Biol 6:155–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1973.tb04444.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Myers JH, Savoie A, van Randen E (1998) Eradication and pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 43:471–491. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.471 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM, Carey JR (2000) Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:316–320. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01914-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Perdices A, Doadrio I (1992) Presence of the Asiatic Cyprinid Pseudorasbora parva Schlegel 1842 in acque interne Italiane. Riv Idrobiol 29:461–467Google Scholar
  26. Philip LJ, Macmillan DC (2005) Exploring values, context and perceptions in contingent valuation studies: the CV market stall technique and willingness to pay for wildlife conservation. J Environ Plan Manag 48:257–274. doi: 10.1080/0964056042000338172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinder AC, Gozlan RE, Britton JR (2005) Dispersal of the invasive topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva in the UK: a vector for an emergent infectious disease. Fish Manag Ecol 12:411–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2005.00466.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinto L, Chandrasena N, Pera J, Hawkins P, Eccles D, Sim R (2005) Managing invasive carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) for habitat enhancement at Botany Wetlands, Australia. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:447–462. doi: 10.1002/aqc.684 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollux BJA, Korosi A (2006) On the occurrence of the Asiatic cyprinid Pseudorasbora parva in the Netherlands. J Fish Biol 69:1575–1580. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01218.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rayner TS, Creese RG (2006) A review of rotenone use for the control of non-indigenous fish in Australian fresh waters, and an attempted eradication of the noxious fish, Phalloceros caudimaculatus. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 40:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Secord D (2003) Biological control of marine invasive species: cautionary tales and land-based lessons. Biol Invasions 5:117–131. doi: 10.1023/A:1024054909052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simberloff D (2002) Today Tiritiri Matangi, tomorrow the World! Are we aiming too low in invasives control? In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN, Gland, pp 4–13Google Scholar
  33. Stokes KE, O’Neill KP, Montgomery WI, Dick JTA, Maggs CA, McDonald RA (2006) The importance of stakeholder engagement in invasive species management: a cross-jurisdictional perspective in Ireland. Biodivers Conserv 15:2829–2852. doi: 10.1007/s10531-005-3137-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wildekamp RH, Van Neer W, Kucuk F, Unlusayin M (1997) First record of the eastern Asiatic gobionid fish Pseudorasbora parva from the Asiatic part of Turkey. J Fish Biol 51:858–861Google Scholar
  35. Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RH, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-organism context. Trends Ecol Evol 16:454–459. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02194-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Robert Britton
    • 1
  • Gareth D. Davies
    • 2
  • Matt Brazier
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Conservation Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Conservation SciencesBournemouth UniversityDorsetUK
  2. 2.National Fisheries Technical Team, Environment AgencyBrampton, HuntingdonUK
  3. 3.Environment Agency Northwest Region North AreaCumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations