Biological Invasions

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 1205–1215

Hybridization-prone plant families do not generate more invasive species

  • Kenneth D. Whitney
  • Jeffrey R. Ahern
  • Lesley G. Campbell
Original Paper

Abstract

Many plant taxa are both hybrid-derived and invasive, suggesting a causal connection. However, given that hybridization is not rare in plants, we should expect some fraction of invasive taxa to be hybrids, even in the absence of an underlying causal relationship. Here, we test the hypothesis that hybridization leads to invasiveness by asking whether the number of hybrids and the numbers of naturalized, weedy, and invasive taxa are correlated across 256 vascular plant families. Data were derived from six regional floras and three global databases listing weeds and invasives. To account for phylogenetic nonindependence, we combined a supertree analysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. After correcting for family size and phylogeny, we conclude that vascular plant families with a higher propensity for hybridization are not more likely to produce more naturalized, weedy, or invasive species than families less prone to hybridization. Instead, hybridization-prone families were in some cases associated with fewer naturalized species and invaders. We present two hypotheses for these patterns, one based on Levin’s (Syst Bot 31:8–12, 2006) ideas on reproductive interference and another based on Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis. While these results do not preclude the possibility that hybridization generates weedy and invasive taxa with some frequency, they do suggest that the signal from the hybridization-invasion process may be relatively weak and easily obscured by other processes governing plant invasions.

Keywords

Adaptation Evolution of invasiveness Introgression Phylogenetically independent contrasts Vascular plant hybrids Weeds 

References

  1. Anderson E (1949) Introgressive hybridization. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson E, Stebbins GL (1954) Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker HG (1986) Patterns of plant invasion in North America. In: Mooney HA, Drake JA (eds) Ecology of biological invasions in North America and Hawaii. Springer, New York, pp 44–57Google Scholar
  5. Cadotte MW, Murray BR, Lovett-Doust J (2006) Evolutionary and ecological influences of plant invader success in the flora of Ontario. Ecoscience 13:388–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell LG, Snow AA, Ridley CE (2006) Weed evolution after crop gene introgression: greater survival and fecundity of hybrids in a new environment. Ecol Lett 9:1198–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cronquist A, Holmgren SH, Holmgren NH, Reveal JL, Holmgren PK (1972–2005) Intermountain flora, vols 1, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6. Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Daehler CC (1998) The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol Conserv 84:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies TJ, Barraclough TG, Chase MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V (2004) Darwin’s abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1904–1909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7043–7050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellstrand NC, Whitkus R, Rieseberg LH (1996) Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:5090–5093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Façon B, Jarne P, Pointier JP, David P (2005) Hybridization and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic variance. J Evol Biol 18:524–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garland T, Dickerman AW, Janis CM, Jones JA (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst Biol 42:265–292Google Scholar
  16. Garland T, Midford PE, Ives AR (1999) An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am Zool 39:374–388Google Scholar
  17. Great Plains Flora Association (1986) Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwood H, O’Dowd DJ, Lake PS (2004) Willow (Salix × rubens) invasion of the riparian zone in south-eastern Australia: reduced abundance and altered composition of terrestrial arthropods. Divers Distrib 10:485–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo QF, Qian H, Ricklefs RE, Xi WM (2006) Distributions of exotic plants in eastern Asia and North America. Ecol Lett 9:827–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickman JC (1993) The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. ISSG (2007) Global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group, IUCN Species Survival Commission, Auckland. http://www.issg.org/database.. Accessed 2 July 2007
  22. Levin DA (2006) The spatial sorting of ecological species: ghost of competition or of hybridization past? Syst Bot 31:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levin DA, FranciscoOrtega J, Jansen RK (1996) Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv Biol 10:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2006) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. http://mesquiteproject.org
  26. Magee DW, Ahles HE (1999) Flora of the Northeast: a manual of the vascular flora of New England and adjacent New York. University of Massachusetts Press, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  27. Martins EP, Garland T (1991) Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters—a simulation study. Evolution 45:534–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Midford PE, Garland T Jr, Maddison W (2002) PDAP:PDTREE package for Mesquite, version 1.00. http://mesquiteproject.org/pdap_mesquite/
  29. Palmer DD (2003) Hawai’i’s ferns and fern allies. University of Hawai’i Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  30. Pilson D, Prendeville HR (2004) Ecological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:149–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pyšek P (1998) Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82:282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Randall RP (2002) A global compendium of weeds. R.G. and F.J. Richardson, MeredithGoogle Scholar
  33. Randall RP (2007) Plant database. Western Australian Department of Agriculture and Food. Unpublished dataGoogle Scholar
  34. Rattenbury JA (1962) Cyclic hybridization as a survival mechanism in New Zealand forest flora. Evolution 16:348–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rejmánek M, Randall JM (2004) The total number of naturalized species can be a reliable predictor of the number of alien pest species. Divers Distrib 10:367–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2005) Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington, pp 104–161Google Scholar
  37. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C (2003) Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301:1211–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rieseberg LH, Kim SC, Randell RA, Whitney KD, Gross BR, Lexer C, Clay K (2007) Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica 129:149–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SAS Institute (2003) The SAS system for windows, release 9.1. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith AR, Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Korall P, Schneider H, Wolf PC (2006) A classification for extant ferns. Taxon 55:705–731Google Scholar
  42. Stace CE (1975) Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Stace CA (1997) New flora of the British Isles, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Stebbins GL (1959) The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc Am Philos Soc 103:231–251Google Scholar
  45. Stebbins GL (1969) The significance of hybridization for plant taxonomy and evolution. Taxon 18:26–35Google Scholar
  46. Stebbins GL (1985) Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of new habitats. Ann Mo Bot Gard 72:824–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stevens JE (2006) Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 7, May 2006. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
  48. Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5841–5845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vilà M, Weber E, D’Antonio CM (2000) Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biol Invasions 2:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Somer SH (1999) Manual of the flowering plants of Hawai’i. University of Hawai’i Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  51. Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber E (2003) Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. CABI Publishing, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Whitney KD, Randell RA, Rieseberg LH (2006) Adaptive introgression of herbivore resistance traits in the weedy sunflower Helianthus annuus. Am Nat 167:794–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth D. Whitney
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Ahern
    • 1
  • Lesley G. Campbell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, 2125 Plant Sciences BuildingUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations