Biological Invasions

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 1883–1894

Invasion by an exotic tree alters above and belowground ecosystem components

  • Melissa R. Martin
  • Philip W. Tipping
  • James O. Sickman
Original Paper

Abstract

With the widespread introduction and invasion of exotic plants there is a need for studies that quantify alterations of basic ecosystem structure and function. Ecosystem invasion by Melaleuca quinquenervia significantly altered both above- and belowground ecosystem components in this study. We measured the quantity and nutrient concentration of the litterfall, litter layer, and soil; microbial biomass pools; and rates of potentially mineralizable nitrogen and soil oxygen demand. Annual litterfall was 4.9 times higher in the non-invaded sites and contained 1.9 times more phosphorus than invaded sites. Non-invaded plots contained a larger litter layer compared to invaded plots: 2.4 ± 1.2 kg m−2 and 0.62 ± 0.3 kg m−2, respectively. Lower nutrient concentration and quantity of the litter layer in the invaded plots led to changes in the aboveground storage of nutrients. In the invaded plots there was four times less carbon, seven times less nitrogen, and ten times less phosphorus stored in the organic litter layer compared to the non-invaded plots. Microbial biomass nutrient pools were consistently lower at both the 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm depth in the invaded soils compared to non-invaded soils, indicating a plant mediated change. Although M. quinquenervia altered microbial community structure, microbial activities were not different between invaded and non-invaded plots at either depth as measured by rates of soil oxygen demand and potentially mineralizable nitrogen. These changes may affect both native plant growth and water quality, and may act to promote and maintain site dominance by M. quinquenervia.

Keywords

Invasion Exotic Litterfall Nutrient Microbial biomass Microbial activity Melaleuca quinquenervia 

References

  1. Andersen JM (1976) Ignition method for determination of total phosphorus in lake sediments. Water Res 10(4):329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batten KM, Scow KM, Davies KF et al (2006) Two invasive plants alter soil microbial community composition in serpentine grasslands. Biol Invasions 8(2):217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenthal DM (2006) Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecol Lett 9(7):887–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodel MJ, Ferriter A, Thayer DD (1994) The biology, distribution, and ecological consequences of Melaleuca quinquenervia in the Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades, the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 341–355Google Scholar
  5. Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1982) Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 14(4):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown S (1981) A comparison of the structure, primary productivity, and transpiration of cypress ecosystems in Florida. Ecol Monogr 51(4):403–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV (2006) Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev 19(1):50–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Mooney HA (2002) Principles of ecosystem ecology. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen TH, Chiu CY, Tian GL (2005) Seasonal dynamics of soil microbial biomass in coastal sand dune forest. Pedobiologia 49(6):645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97(2):153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Antonio C, Meyerson LA (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Rest Ecol 10(4):703–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davet P (2004) Microbial ecology of the soil and plant growth. Science Publishers, Inc., EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  13. DiStefano JF, Fisher RF (1983) Invasion potential of Melaleuca quinquenervia in Southern Florida, USA. For Ecol Manag 7(2):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dray FA, Bennett BC, Center TD (2006) Invasion history of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake in Florida. Castanea 71(3):210–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6(6):503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eviner VT, Chapin FS III (2003) Biogeochemical interaction and biodiversity. In: Melillo JM, Field CB, Moldan B (eds) Interactions of the major biogeochemical cycles, global change and human impacts. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 151–173Google Scholar
  17. Ewel KC, Odum HT (1984) Part I. Ecological patterns in cypress swamps. In (ed) Cypress swamps. University Presses of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenn ME, Baron JS, Allen EB et al (2003) Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the western United States. Bioscience 53(4):404–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenway M (1994) Litter accession and accumulation in a Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav) Blake, S.T. Wetland in South-Eastern Queensland. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 45(8):1509–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunderson M (1994) Vegetation of the Everglades, determinants of community composition. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades, the ecosystem and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 323–340Google Scholar
  21. Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbagy EG et al (2002) Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature 418(6898):623–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaufman SR, Smouse PE (2001) Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake: response of seedlings to water and pH levels. Oecologia 127(4):487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom M (2003) Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 35(7):895–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LaRoche FB, Ferriter AP (1992) The rate of expansion of Melaleuca in South Florida. J Aquat Plant Manag 30:62–65Google Scholar
  25. Lopez-Zamora I, Comerford NB, Muchovej RM (2004) Root development and competitive ability of the invasive species Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) ST Blake in the South Florida flatwoods. Plant Soil 263(1–2):239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luczak C, Janquin MA, Kupka A (1997) Simple standard procedure for the routine determination of organic matter in marine sediment. Hydrobiologia 345:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mack MC, D’Antonio CM (1998) Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 13(5):195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM et al (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10(3):689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malecki LM, White JR, Reddy KR (2004) Nitrogen and phosphorus flux rates from sediment in the Lower St. Johns River estuary. J Environ Qual 33(4):1545–1555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazzotti FJ, Ostrenko W, Smith AT (1981) Effects of the exotic plants Melaleuca quinquenervia and Casuarina equisetifolia on small mammal populations in the Eastern Florida Everglades. Fla Sci 44:65–71Google Scholar
  31. Mazzotti FJ, Center TD, Dray FA et al (1997) Ecological consequences of invasion by Melaleuca quinquenervia in south Florida wetlands: paradise damaged, not lost. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin SS-WEC-123Google Scholar
  32. Meskimen GF (1962) A silvicultural study of the melaleuca tree in south Florida. M.S. Thesis, Univeristy of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitsch WJ, Ewel KC (1979) Comparative biomass and growth of cypress in Florida wetlands. Am Midl Nat 101(2):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nessel JK, Bayley E (1984) Distribution and dynamics of organic matter and phosphorus in a sewage-enriched cypress swamp. In: Ewel KC, Odum HT (eds) Cypress swamps. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, pp 262–278Google Scholar
  35. Rayamajhi MB, Van TK, Center TD et al (2002) Biological attributes of the canopy-held Melaleuca seeds in Australia and Florida, US. J Aquat Plant Manag 40:87–91Google Scholar
  36. Reddy KR, Rao PSC, Patrick WH (1980) Factors influencing oxygen-consumption rates in flooded soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(4):741–744Google Scholar
  37. Serbesoff-King K (2003) Melaleuca in Florida: a literature review on the taxonomy, distribution, biology, ecology, economic importance and control measures. J Aquat Plant Manag 41:98–112Google Scholar
  38. SERC (2007) Naples, Florida (086078) period of record monthly climate summary. Available via DIALOG. http://www.sercc.com/cgi-in/sercc/cliMAIN.pl?fl6078. Cited 17 Nov 2007
  39. Stocker RK, Sanders Sr DR (1981) Chemical control of Melaleuca quinquenervia. In: Proceedings of Melaleuca symposium, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Forestry, pp 129–134Google Scholar
  40. Tipping PW, Martin MR, Pratt PD et al (2008) Suppression of growth and reproduction of an exotic invasive tree by two introduced insects. Biol Control 44:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. USDA (1998). Soil survey of Collier county area, Florida. United State Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation ServiceGoogle Scholar
  42. USEPA (1993). Methods of chemical analysis of water and wastes. USEPA 600/R 93/100. Ohio Environmental Monitoring Support Laboratory, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  43. Van TK, Rayachhetry MB, Center TD (1998) Reproductive ecology of melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) in south Florida. Weed Sci Soc Am 38:23–30Google Scholar
  44. Van TK, Rayachhetry MB, Center TD (2000) Estimating aboveground biomass of Melaleuca in south Florida. J Aquat Plant Manag 38:62–67Google Scholar
  45. Van TK, Rayachhetry MB, Center TD et al (2002) Litter dynamics and phenology of Melaleuca quinquenervia in South Florida. J Aquat Plant Manag 40:22–27Google Scholar
  46. Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass-C. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vitousek PM, Matson PA (1984) Mechanisms of nitrogen-retention in forest ecosystems—a field experiment. Science 225(4657):51–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989) Biological Invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii—plant demography, nitrogen-fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol Monogr 59(3):247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN et al (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304(5677):1629–1633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White JR, Reddy KR (1999) Influence of nitrate and phosphorus loading on denitrifying enzyme activity in Everglades wetland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(6):1945–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White JR, Reddy KR (2000) Influence of phosphorus loading on organic nitrogen mineralization of everglades soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(4):1525–1534Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa R. Martin
    • 1
  • Philip W. Tipping
    • 2
  • James O. Sickman
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Soil and Water ScienceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Plant Research LaboratoryFort LauderdaleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations