Biological Invasions

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 619–624

Comparing the effects of the exotic cactus-feeding moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and the native cactus-feeding moth, Melitara prodenialis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on two species of Florida Opuntia

Original Paper


This study examined the effects of the native cactus moth borer, Melitara prodenialis, and the invasive cactus moth borer, Cactoblastis cactorum, on two common cactus species, Opuntia stricta and O. humifusa at coastal and inland locations in central Florida. Opuntia stricta were present only at coastal sites and O. humifusa were present at coastal and inland sites. Throughout the duration of the study, coastal plants were subject to damage solely by C. cactorum and inland plants solely by M. prodenialis. Results showed marginally significantly higher numbers of eggsticks on O. stricta than O. humifusa and significantly higher numbers at coastal sites than at inland sites. There was also significantly higher moth damage on O. stricta than O. humifusa and at coastal sites than inland sites, but not significantly so. However, there was a higher level of plant mortality for O. humifusa than for O. stricta and a significantly higher level of cactus mortality at inland sites when compared to coastal sites. This increased mortality may be due to increased attack by true bugs, Chelinidea vittiger, and by Dactylopius sp., combined with attack by M. prodenialis. Inland plants also tended to be smaller than coastal plants and could be more susceptible to the combined effects of all insects. Further long-term research on coastal cactus survival when attacked and unattacked by Cactoblastis is necessary to fully determine the effects of this moth on Opuntia survival.


Cactoblastis cactorum Melitara prodenialis Opuntia humifusa O. stricta Mortality of native cacti 


  1. Dodd AP (1940) The biological campaign against prickly-pear. The Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. Gibson AG, Nobel PS (1986) The cactus primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  3. Habeck DH, Bennett FD (1990) Cactoblastis cactorum Berg (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), a Phycitine new to Florida. Entomology Circular No. 333, Florida Deptartment of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant IndustriesGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoffmann JH, Zimmermann HG (1989) Ovipositional and feeding habits in cactophagous pyralids: prediction for biological control of cactus weeds. In: Delfosse ES (ed) Proceedings of the VII Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. MAF, Rome, pp 395–399Google Scholar
  5. Irish M (2001) The ornamental prickly pear industry in the southwestern United States. Fla Entomol 84:484–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson DM, Stiling PD (1996) Host specificity of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida. Environ Entomol 25:743–748Google Scholar
  7. Johnson DM, Stiling PD (1998) Distribution and dispersal of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida. Fla Entomol 81:12–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mann J (1969) Cactus-feeding insects and mites. Bulletin 256, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Soberon J, Golubov J, Sarukhan J (2001) The importance of Opuntia in Mexico and routes of invasion and impact of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Fla Entomol 84:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stiling P (2002) Potential non-target effects of a biological control agent, prickly pear moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in North America, and possible management actions. Biol Invasions 4:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wunderlin RP, Hansen BF (2003) Guide to the vascular plants of Florida, 2nd edn. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations