Biological Invasions

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 309–315 | Cite as

The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact

  • Anthony Ricciardi
  • Jill Cohen
Original Paper


Inconsistent use of terminology plagues the study and management of biological invasions. The term “invasive” has been used to describe inter alia (1) any introduced non-indigenous species; (2) introduced species that spread rapidly in a new region; and (3) introduced species that have harmful environmental impacts, particularly on native species. The second definition in various forms is more commonly used by ecologists, while the third definition is pervasive in policy papers and legislation. We tested the relationship between the invasiveness of an introduced species and its impact on native biodiversity. We quantified a species’ invasiveness by both its rate of establishment and its rate of spread, while its impact was assigned a categorical ranking based on the documented effects of the invader on native species populations. We found no correlations between these variables for introduced plants, mammals, fishes, invertebrates, amphibians and reptiles, suggesting that the mechanisms of invasion and impact are not strongly linked. Our results support the view that the term “invasive” should not be used to connote negative environmental impact.


Exotic species Impact Invasive species Non-indigenous Rate of spread Risk assessment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We thank Lisa Jones for commenting on the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.


  1. Andow DA, Kareiva PM, Levin SA, Okubo A (1990) Spread of invading organisms. Landscape Ecol 4:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boudouresque CF, Verlaque M (2002) Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes. Mar Pollut Bull 44: 32–38Google Scholar
  3. Byers JE (2002) Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos 97:449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2003) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443Google Scholar
  5. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427:731–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. CBD (2006) Invasive Alien Species. Convention on biological diversity. Retrieved from on 10 May 2006
  7. Clinton WJ (1999) Executive order 13112. Invasive species. The White House, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers Distribut 10:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronk QCB, Fuller JL (2001) Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis MA, Thompson K (2001) Eight ways to be a colonizer, two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 81:226–230Google Scholar
  11. Environment Canada (2004) An invasive alien species strategy for Canada. Government of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. Falk-Petersen J, Bohn T, Sandlund OT (2006) On the numerous concepts in invasion biology. Biol Invasions 8 (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Fuller P (2006) Non-indigenous Aquatic Species (NAS) Database. Retrieved from on 10 May 2006Google Scholar
  14. Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ, Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conserv Biol 13:422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grosholz ED (1996) Contrasting rates of spread for introduced species in terrestrial and marine systems. Ecology 77:1680–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes KR, McEnnulty FR, Sliwa C (2002) Identifying potential marine pests – an inductive approach. Final report for Environment Australia, June 2002. Center for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, CSIRO Marine ResearchGoogle Scholar
  17. Heutte T, Bella E (2003) Invasive plants and exotic weeds of Southeast Alaska. USDA Forest Service, Anchorage, Alaska. Retrieved from http://akweeds.uaa. on 10 May 2006Google Scholar
  18. Kimmerer WJ, Gartside E, Orsi JJ (1994) Predation by an introduced clam as the likely cause of substantial declines in zooplankton of San Francisco Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 113:81–93Google Scholar
  19. Klironomos J (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohler CC (1992) Environmental risk management of introduced aquatic organisms in aquaculture. ICES Mar Sci Symposia 194:15–20Google Scholar
  21. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lever C (1996) Naturalized fishes of the world. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  24. Lever C (2003) Naturalized amphibians and reptiles of the world. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine JM, Vilà M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc London B 270:775–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Long JL (2003) Introduced mammals of the world. CSIRO Publishers, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  27. MacIsaac HJ, Grigorovich IA, Ricciardi A (2001) Reassessment of species invasions concepts: the Great Lakes basin as a model. Biol Invasions 3:405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mack RN, D’Antonio CM (1998) Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 13:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NAISA (2003) National Aquatic Invasive Species Act. 109th U.S. Congress. Retrieved from on 10 May 2006
  30. Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Galil BS (2004) A uniform terminology on bioinvasions: a chimera or an operative tool? Mar Pollut Bull 49:688–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ortega YK, Pearson DE (2005) Weak vs. strong invaders of natural plant communities: assessing invasibility and impact. Ecol Appl 15:651–661Google Scholar
  32. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Potvin F, Beaupré P, Laprise G (2003) The eradication of balsam fir stands by white-tailed deer on Anticosti Island, Quebec: a 150-year process. Ecoscience 10:487–495Google Scholar
  34. Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ricciardi A (2003) Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions. Freshw Biol 48:972–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7:781–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ricciardi A, Whoriskey FG, Rasmussen JB (1996) Impact of the Dreissena invasion on native unionid bivalves in the upper St. Lawrence River. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci 53:1434–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distributions 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rilov G, Benayahu Y, Gasith A (2004) Prolonged lag in population outbreak of an invasive mussel: a shifting-habitat model. Biol Invasions 6:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 8 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  41. Shanks AL, Grantham BA, Carr MH (2003) Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:S159–S169Google Scholar
  42. Spadinger R, Maier G (1999) Prey selection and diel feeding of the freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbyi. Freshw Biol 41:567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5841–5845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Talley TS, Levin LA (2001) Modification of sediments and macrofauna by an invasive marsh plant. Biol Invasions 3:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. UCS (2006) Invasive Species. Union of Concerned Scientists of the USA. Retrieved from http://www.uc on 10 May 2006
  46. Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218Google Scholar
  47. Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations