Does Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis Explain Fish Invasions?
- First Online:
- 327 Downloads
Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis predicts that introduced species tend not to invade areas containing congeneric native species, because they would otherwise compete with their close relatives and would likely encounter predators and pathogens that can attack them. An opposing view is that introduced species should succeed in areas where native congeners are present because they are more likely to share traits that pre-adapt them to their new environment. A test of both these hypotheses using data on fish introductions from several independent regions fails to support either viewpoints. In contrast to studies of nonindigenous plants, our results suggest that taxonomic affiliation is not an important general predictor of fish invasion success.
Keywordsbiotic resistance colonization exotic species invasion success nonindigenous species prediction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cudmore-Vokey B and Crossman EJ (2000) Checklists of the fish fauna of the Laurentian Great Lakes and their connecting channels. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, No. 2550Google Scholar
- Darwin C (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fofonoff PW, Ruiz GM, Steves B, Hines AH and Carlton JT (2003) National Exotic Marine and Estuarine Species Information System. http://invasions/si.edu/nemesis/Google Scholar
- Froese R and Pauly D (2004) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (10/2004)Google Scholar
- Harvey BC, White JL and Nakamoto RJ (2004). An emergent multiple predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream assemblage. Ecology 85: 127–133Google Scholar
- Leach JH (2003). Unusual invaders of Lake Erie. Point Pelee Natural History News 3(1): 1–5Google Scholar
- Marchetti MP, Moyle PB and Levine R (2004). Alien fishes in California watershed: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecological Applications 14: 587–596Google Scholar
- Mills EL, Scheuerell MD, Carlton J and Strayer DL (1997) Biological invasions in the Hudson River basin: an inventory and historical analysis. New York State Museum Circular No. 57, New York State Education Department, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Rejmanek M (1998). Invasive plant species and invadible ecosystems. In: Sandlund, OT, Schei, PJ and Vilken, A (eds) Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management, pp 79–102. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar