Biological Invasions

, 8:1179 | Cite as

Predicted Impact of an Exotic Generalist Predator on Monarch Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Populations: A Quantitative Risk Assessment

  • R. L. Koch
  • R. C. Venette
  • W. D. Hutchison


The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas), was recently identified as a potential hazard to monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.). A quantitative risk assessment for the potential impact of H. axyridis on D. plexippus in Minnesota corn and soybean fields was developed using risk analysis software. This assessment considered a potential worst-case scenario for the impact of H. axyridis on D. plexippus. Habitat-specific recruitment of D. plexippus eggs was determined empirically. Subsequently, simulated abundance of D. plexippus in each habitat was reduced by two classes of stage-specific mortality: predation by H. axyridis and causes other than H. axyridis. Predation was modeled as a function of D. plexippus exposure to H. axyridis, and predation rate of D. plexippus by H. axyridis. Exposure and subsequent risk varied considerably by habitat, with a low risk of H. axyridis adversely affecting D. plexippus populations developing in corn fields, but a moderate to high risk in soybean fields. Predicted rates of D. plexippus mortality attributable to H. axyridis were greater in soybean compared to corn fields, possibly due to the numerical response of H. axyridis to soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. This study demonstrates that H. axyridis has the potential to have a strong adverse impact on D. plexippus populations. However, the likelihood of occurrence for this worst-case scenario remains uncertain. To evaluate the landscape-level risk of H. axyridis impacting D. plexippus, further data on recruitment of D. plexippus in other habitats and exposure estimates specific to additional habitats are needed.


@RISK biological control Danaus plexippus Harmonia axyridis non-target effects risk assessment 


  1. Alyokhin A and Sewell G (2004). Changes in a lady beetle community following the establishment of three alien species. Biological Invasions 6: 463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andow DA, Lane CP and Olson DM (1995). Use of Trichogramma in maize – estimating environmental risks. In: Lynch, JM and Hokkanen, HMT (eds) Benefits and Risks of Introducing Biocontrol Agents, pp 101––118. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Babendreier D, Kuske S and Bigler F (2003a). Non-target host acceptance and parasitism by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichorammatidae) in the laboratory. Biological Control 26: 128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babendreier D, Kuske S and Bigler F (2003b). Parasitism of non-target butterflies by Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichorammatidae) field cage and field conditions. Biological Control 26: 139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babendreier D, Schoch D, Kuske S, Dorn S and Bigler F (2003c). Non-target habitat exploitation by Trichogramma brassicae (Hym. Trichogrammatidae): what are the risks for endemic butterflies?. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5: 199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boettner GH, Elkinton JS and Boettner CJ (2000). Effects of a biological control introduction on three nontarget native species of saturniid moths. Conservation Biology 14: 1798–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borkin SS (1982). Notes on the shifting distribution patterns and survival of immature Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) on the food plant Asclepias syriaca. Great Lakes Entomologist 15: 199–206Google Scholar
  8. Brown MW and Miller SS (1998). Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in apple orchards of eastern West Virginia and the impact of invasion by Harmonia axyridis. Entomological News 109: 136–142Google Scholar
  9. Caltagiron LE and Doutt RL (1989). The history of the vedalia beetle importation to California and its impact on the development of biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carey JR (1993). Applied Demography for Biologists: With Special Emphasis on Insects. In: (eds) Oxford University Press, Inc., pp 206. USA, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Colunga-Garcia M and Gage SH (1998). Arrival, establishment and habitat use of the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in a Michigan landscape. Environmental Entomology 27: 1574–1580Google Scholar
  12. Day WH, Prokrym DR, Ellis DR and Chianese RJ (1994). The known distribution of the predator Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States, and thoughts on the origin of this species and five other exotic lady beetles in eastern North America. Entomological News 105: 224–256Google Scholar
  13. De Clercq P (2002). Dark clouds and their silver linings: exotic generalist predators in augmentative biological control. Neotropical Entomology 31: 169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Debach P and Rosen D (1991). Biological Control by Natural Enemies. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 440 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Dively GP, Rose R, Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Calvin DD, Russo JM and Anderson PL (2004). Effects on monarch butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) after continuous exposure to Cry1Ab-expressing corn during anthesis. Environmental Entomology 33: 1116–1125Google Scholar
  16. (1998). Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Federal Register 63: 26846–26926Google Scholar
  17. Follett PA and Duan JJ (1999). Non-target Effects of Biological Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox TB, Landis DA, Cardoso FF and Difonzo CD (2004). Predators suppress Aphis glycines Matsumura population growth in soybean. Environmental Entomology 33: 608–618Google Scholar
  19. Giroux S, Duchesne RM and Coderre D. (1995). Predation of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) by Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): comparative effectiveness of predator developmental stages and effect of temperature. Environmental Entomology 24: 748–754Google Scholar
  20. Gordon RD (1985). The Coleoptera (Coccinellidae) of America north of Mexico. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 93: 1–912Google Scholar
  21. Hartzler RG and Buhler DD (2000). Occurrence of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in cropland and adjacent areas. Crop Protection 19: 363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heimpel GE, Ragsdale DW, Venette RC, Hopper KR, O’Neil RJ, Rutledge CE and Wu Z (2004). Prospects for importation biological control of the soybean aphid: anticipating potential costs and benefits. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgson EW (2005) Population dynamics and sampling of the soybean aphid. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  24. Howarth FG (1991). Environmental impacts of classical biological control. Annual Review of Entomology. 36: 485–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howarth FG (2000). Non-target effects of biological control agents. In: Gurr, G and Wratten, S (eds) Biological Control: Measures of Success, pp 369––403. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Kajita Y, Takano F, Yasuda H and Agarwala B (2000). Effects of indigenous ladybird species (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on the survival of an exotic species in relation to prey abundance. Applied Entomology and Zoology 35: 473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koch RL (2003). The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis: a review of its biology, uses in biological control and non-target impacts. Journal of Insect Science 3: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koch RL, Hutchison WD, Venette RC and Heimpel GE (2003a). Susceptibility of immature monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Danainae), to predation by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biological Control 28: 265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koch RL, Hutchison WD and Venette RC (2003b). Survival of monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Nymphalidae), larvae on milkweed near Bt cornfields. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 57: 92–99Google Scholar
  30. Koch RL and Hutchison WD (2003). Phenology and blacklight trapping of the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in a Minnesota agricultural landscape. Journal of Entomological Science 38: 477–480Google Scholar
  31. Koch RL, Venette RC and Hutchison WD (2004). Nontarget effects of the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): case study with the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). American Entomologist 50: 155–156Google Scholar
  32. Koch RL, Venette RC and Hutchison WD (2005). Influence of alternate prey on predation of monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) larvae by the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environmental Entomology 34: 410–416Google Scholar
  33. Krafsur ES, Kring TJ, Miller JC, Nariboli P, Obrycki JJ, Ruerson JR and Schaefer PW (1997). Gene flow in the exotic colonizing ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis in North America. Biological Control 8: 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuske S, Widmer F, Edwards PJ, Turlings TCJ, Babendreier D and Bigler F (2003). Dispersal and persistence of mass released Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in non-target habitats. Biological Control 27: 181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lavoie B and Oberhauser KS (2004). Compensatory feeding in Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in response to variation in host plant quality. Environmental Entomology 33: 1062–1069Google Scholar
  36. Lee JH and Kang TJ (2004). Functional response of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) in the laboratory. Biological Control 31: 306–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Louda SM, Pemberton RW, Johnson MT and Follett PA (2003). Nontarget effects – The Achilles’ heel of biological control? Retrospective analysis to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annual Review of Entomology 48: 369–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malcolm SB and Zalucki MP (1993). Biology and Conservation of the Monarch Butterfly. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, 419 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Michaud JP (2002a). Biological control of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Florida: a preliminary report. Entomological News 113: 216–222Google Scholar
  40. Michaud JP (2002b). Invasion of the Florida Citrus ecosystem by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and asymmetric competition with a native species, Cycloneda sanguinea. Environmental Entomology 31: 827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mochizuki A and Mitsunaga T (2004). Non-target impact assessment of the introduced green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on the indigenous sibling species, C. nipponensis (Okamoto) through interspecific predation. Applied Entomology and Zoology 39: 217–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Musser FR and Shelton AM (2003). Predation of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs in sweet corn by generalist predators and the impact of alternative foods. Environmental Entomology 32: 1131–1138Google Scholar
  43. Musser FR, Nyrop JP and Shelton AM (2004). Survey of predators and sampling method comparison in sweet corn. Journal of Economic Entomology 97: 136–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. (2004). Acreage. Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 42Google Scholar
  45. Oberhauser KS and Kuda K (1997). A field guide to monarch caterpillars (Danaus plexippus) Monarchs in the classroom. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, 14 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. Oberhauser KS, Prisby MD, Mattila HR, Stanley-Horn DE, Sears MK, Dively G, Olson E, Pleasants JM, Lam WKF and Hellmich RL (2001). Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 11913–11918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oberhauser KS and Solensky MJ (2004). The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 248Google Scholar
  48. Radcliffe EB and Flanders KL (1998). Biological control of alfalfa weevil in North America. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 3: 225–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenheim JA, Wilhoit LR and Armer CA (1993). Influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore population. Oecologia 96: 439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rutledge CE, O’Neil RJ, Fox TB and Landis DA (2004). Soybean aphid predators and their use in integrated pest management. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schellhorn NA (2003) Diagnostic Guide to Coccinellids in Agricultural Fields in Southeastern Minnesota. Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota. (
  52. Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD and Dively GP (2001). Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 11937–11942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simberloff D and Stiling P (1996). How risky is biological control. Ecology 77: 1965–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stanley-Horn DE, Dively GP, Hellmich RL, Mattila HR, Sears MK, Rose R, Hansen Jesse LC, Losey JE, Obrycki JJ and Lewis L (2001). Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch larvae in field studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 11931–11936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stiling P (2004). Biological control not on target. Biological Invasions 6: 151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strong DR and Pemberton RW (2000). Biological control of invading species – risk and reform. Science 288: 1969–1970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tedders WL and Schaefer PW (1994). Release and establishment of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the southeastern United States. Entomological News 105: 228–243Google Scholar
  58. Bellows TS (1996). Biological Control. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Wassenaar LI and Hobson KA (1998). Natal origins of migratory monarch butterflies at wintering colonies in Mexico: new isotopic evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 15436–15439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wold SJ, Burkness EC, Hutchison WD and Venette RC (2001). In-field monitoring of beneficial insect populations in transgenic sweet corn expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin. Journal of Entomological Science 36: 177–187Google Scholar
  61. Wolt JD, Peterson RKD, Bystrak P and Meade T (2003). A screening level approach for nontarget insect risk assessment: transgenic Bt corn and the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae). Environmental Entomology 32: 237–246Google Scholar
  62. Yasuda H, Evans EW, Kajita Y, Urakawa K and Takizawa T (2004). Asymmetric larval interactions between introduced and indigenous ladybirds in North America. Oecologia 141: 722–731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zalucki MP and Kitching RL (1982). Temporal and spatial variation of mortality in field populations of Danaus plexippus L. and D. chrysippus L. larvae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Oecologia 53: 201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zangerl AR, McKenna D, Wraight CL, Carroll M, Ficarello P, Warner R and Berenbaum MR (2001). Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 11908–11912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations