Biological Invasions

, Volume 8, Issue 8, pp 1629–1641 | Cite as

Interactions between two co-dominant, invasive plants in the understory of a temperate deciduous forest



Negative interactions between non-indigenous and native species has been an important research topic of invasion biology. However, interactions between two or more invasive species may be as important in understanding biological invasions, but they have rarely been studied. In this paper, we describe three field experiments that investigated interactions between two non-indigenous plant species invasive in the eastern United States, Lonicera japonica (a perennial vine) and Microstegium vimineum (an annual grass). A press removal experiment conducted within a deciduous forest understory community indicated that M. vimineum was a superior competitor to L. japonica. We tested the hypothesis that the competitive success of M. vimineum was because it overgrew, and reduced light available to, L. japonica, by conducting a separate light gradient experiment within the same community. Shade cloth that simulated the M. vimineum canopy reduced the performance of L. japonica. In a third complementary experiment, we added experimental support hosts to test the hypothesis that the competitive ability of L. japonica is limited by support hosts, onto which L. japonica climbs to access light. We found that the abundance of climbing branches increased with the number of support hosts. Results of this experiment indicate that these two invasive species compete asymmetrically for resources, particularly light.


competition invasional meltdown invasive species Lonicera japonica Microstegium vimineum non-indigenous species 



Analysis of Variance


General Linear Model


Multivariate Analysis of Variance with Repeated Measures


Oak Ridge Environmental Research Park


photosynthetic photon flux density


Relative Competition Index


time domain reflectometry


volumetric water content


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barden, LS 1987Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant, C4 grass, into a North Carolina floodplainAmerican Midland Naturalist1184045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belote RT (2003) Effects of elevated CO2 on a forest understory community dominated by two invasive plants. MS thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville,76 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Belote, RT, Weltzin, JF, Norby, RJ 2004Response of an understory plant community to elevated [CO2] depends on differential responses of dominant invasive species and is mediated by soil water availabilityNew Phytologist61827835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender, EA, Case, TJ, Gilpin, ME 1984Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practiceEcology65113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, B, Johnson, K, Franklin, S, Call, G, Webber, M 2002Invasive exotic pest plants in TennesseeJ. Tennessee Acad. Sci.774548Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, MH 1967Honeysuckle – a bold competitor on bottomland hardwood sitesForest Farmer26917Google Scholar
  7. Call, LJ, Nilsen, ET 2005Analysis of interactions between the invasive tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and the native black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia)Plant Ecology176275285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callaway, RM 1995Positive interactions among plantsBotanical Review61306349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaway, RM, Aschehoug, ET 2000Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasionScience290521523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callaway, RM, Ridenour, WM 2004Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive abilityFrontiers in Ecology and Environment2436443Google Scholar
  11. Carothers, JH, Jaksic, FM 1984Time as a niche difference: the role of interference competitionOikos42403406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, GA, Teramura, AH 1988Vine photosynthesis and relationships to climbing mechanics in a forest understoryAmerican Journal of Botany7510111018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claridge, K, Franklin, SB 2002Compensation and plasticity in an invasive plant speciesBiological Invasions4339347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clements, FE, Weaver, JE, Hanson, HC 1929Plant Competition: An Analysis of Community FunctionCarnegie Institute of WashingtonWashington340Google Scholar
  15. Cole PG (2003) Environmental constraints on the distribution of the non-native invasive grass Microstegium vimineum. PhD dissertation, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 102 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Cole, PG, Weltzin, JF 2004Light limitation creates patchy distribution of an invasive grass in eastern deciduous forestsBiological Invasions7477488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darwin, C 1859On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural SelectionJohn MurrayLondon502Google Scholar
  18. Davis, MA, Grime, JP, Thompson, K 2000Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibilityJournal of Ecology88528534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, MA, Thompson, K 2001Invasion Terminology: should ecologists define their terms differently than others? No, not if we want to be of any help!Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America82206Google Scholar
  20. Davis, MA, Thompson, K 2000Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invaderBulletin of the Ecological Society of America81226230Google Scholar
  21. Dillenburg, LR, Whigham, DF, Teramura, AH, Forseth, IN 1993Effects of vine competition on availability of light, water, and nitrogen to a tree host (Liquidambar styraciflua)American Journal of Botany80244252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drake, SJ, Weltzin, JF, Parr, PD 2003Assessment of non-native invasive plants on the National Environmental Research Park at Oak Ridge National LaboratoryCastanea681530Google Scholar
  23. Ehrenfeld, JG, Kourtev, P, Huang, W 2001Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forestsEcological Applications1112871300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elton, CS 1958Invasions by Animals and PlantsKluwer Academic Publishers B.V.Chicago181Google Scholar
  25. Fairbrothers, DE, Gray, JR 1972Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Granimae) in the United StatesBulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club9997100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldberg, DE, Barton, AM 1992Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plantsThe American Naturalist139771801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grime, JP 1965Comparative experiments as a key to the ecology of flowering plantsEcology46513515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grime, JP 1973Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetationNature242344347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gurevitch, J, Scheiner, SM, Fox, GA 2002The Ecology of PlantsSinauer Associates Inc.Sunderland, MA540Google Scholar
  30. Hierro, JL, Maron, JL, Callaway, RM 2005A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native rangeJournal of Ecology93515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horton, JL, Neufeld, HS 1998Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C4 grass, to variable light environmentsOecologia1141119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunt, DM, Zaremba, RE 1992The northeastern spread of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae) into New York and adjacent statesRhodora94167170Google Scholar
  33. Huston, MA 1979A general hypothesis of species diversityAmerican Naturalist11381101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inouye, BD 2001Response surface experimental designs for investigating interspecific competitionEcology8226962706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keddy, PA 2001Competition2Kluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht, The Netherlands552Google Scholar
  36. Kourtev, PS, Ehrenfeld, JG, Wuang, WZ 1998Effects of exotic plant species on soil properties in hardwood forests of New JerseyWater Air and Soil Pollution105493501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larson, KC 1999Circumnutation behavior of an exotic honeysuckle vine and its native congener: influence on clonal mobilityAmerican Journal of Botany87533538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leatherman AD (1955) Ecological life-history of Lonicera japonica Thunb. PhD dissertation, Department of Botany, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 97 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Levene, H 1960

    Robust tests for equality of variances

    Oikin, IGhurye, SGHoeffding, WMadow, WGMann, HB eds. Contributions to probability and statisticsStanford University PressStanford, CA278292
    Google Scholar
  40. Luken, JO 2003

    Invasions of forests in the eastern United States

    Gilliam, FSRoberts, MR eds. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North AmericaOxoford University PressNew York, NY283301
    Google Scholar
  41. MacArthur, RH, Wilson, EO 1967The Theory of Island BiogeographyPrinceton University PressPrinceton, New Jersey, USA224Google Scholar
  42. Mack, RN, Simberloff, D, Lonsdale, WM, Evans, H, Clout, M, Bazzaz, FA 2000Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and controlEcological Applications10689710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mack, RN, D’Antonio, CM 1998Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimesTrends in Ecology and Evolution13195198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mueller-Dombois, D, Ellenberg, H 1974Aims and Methods of Vegetation EcologyJohn Wiley and SonsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman, EI 1973Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetationNature244310311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norby, RJ, Hanson, PJ, O’Neill, EG, Tschaplinski, TJ, Weltzin, JF, Hansen, RT, Cheng, W, Wullschleger, SD, Gunderson, CA, Edwards, NT, Johnson, DW 2002Net primary productivity of a CO2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storageEcological Applications1212611266Google Scholar
  47. Parker, IM, Simberloff, D, Lonsdale, WM, Goodell, K, Wonham, M, Kareiva, PM, Williamson, MH, Holle, BV, Moyle, PB, Byers, JE, Goldwasser, L 1999Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invadersBiological Invasions1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reader, RJ, Best, BJ 1989Variation in competition along an environmental gradient: Hieracium floribundum in an abandoned pastureJournal of Ecology77673684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Redman, DE 1995Distribution and habitat types for Nepal Microstegium [Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) Camus] in Maryland and the District of ColumbiaCastanea60270275Google Scholar
  50. Robertson, DJ, Robertson, MC, Tague, T 1994Colonization dynamics of four exotic plants in a northern Piedmont natural areaBulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club121107118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sala, A, Devitt, DE, Smith, SD 1996Water use by Tamarix ramosissima and associated phreatophytes in a Mojave Desert floodplainEcological Applications6888898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT user’s guide Version 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.Google Scholar
  53. Shapiro, SS, Wilk, MB 1965An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)Biometrika52591611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shea, K, Chesson, P 2002Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasionsTrends in Ecology and Evolution17170176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sher, AA, Hyatt, LA 1999The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasionBiological Invasions1107114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simberloff, D, Holle, B 1999Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown?Biological Invasions12132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soil Conservation Service (1967) Soil survey and laboratory data and descriptions for some soils of Tennessee. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 15, U.S. Dept. Agric., Soil Conservation Service and Tennessee Agricultural Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
  58. Spyreas, G, Ellis, J, Carroll, C, Molano-Flores, B 2004Non-native plant commonness and dominance in the forest, wetlands, and grasslands of Illinois, USANatural Areas Journal24290299Google Scholar
  59. Tilman, D 1982Resource Competition and Community StructurePrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJ296Google Scholar
  60. Tilman, D 1987The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competitionThe American Naturalist129769774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. USDA, NRCS (2004) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874–4490 USA. Retrieved from on 3 July 2004Google Scholar
  62. Miegroet, H, Norby, RJ, Tschaplinski, TJ 1994Optimum nitrogen fertilization in a short-rotation sycamore plantationForest Ecology and Management642540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vitousek, PM, Walker, LR 1989Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii; Plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effectsEcological Monographs59247265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vitousek, PM, Mooney, HA, Lubchenco, J, Melillo, JM 1997Human domination of the Earth’s ecosystemsScience277494499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whigham, D 1984The influence of vines on the growth of Liquidambar styraciflua L. (sweetgum)Canadian Journal of Forest Research14739Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, SD, Tilman, D 1991Components of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availabilityEcology7210501065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zar, JH 1999Biostatistical Analysis4Prentice Hall Inc.Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations