Biological Invasions

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 655–664 | Cite as

Environmental Productivity and Biodiversity Effects on Invertebrate Community Invasibility

  • Beatrix E. Beisner
  • Jonathan Hovius
  • April Hayward
  • Jurek Kolasa
  • Tamara N. Romanuk
Article

Abstract

Productivity influences the availability of resources for colonizing species. Biodiversity may also influence invasibility of communities because of more complete use of resource types with increasing species richness. We hypothesized that communities with higher environmental productivity and lower species richness should be more invasible by a competitor than those where productivity is low or where richness is high. We experimentally examined the invasion resistance of herbivorous meiofauna of Jamaican rock pools by a competitor crustacean (Ostracoda: Potamocypris sp. (Brady)) by contrasting three levels of nutrient input and four levels of species richness. Although relative abundance (dominance) of the invasive was largely unaffected by resource availability, increasing resources did increase the success rate of establishment. Effects of species richness on dominance were more pronounced with a trend towards the lowest species richness treatment of 2 resident species being more invasible than those with 4, 6, or 7 species. These results can be attributed to a ‘sampling effect associated with the introduction of Alona davidii (Richard) into the higher biodiversity treatments. Alona dominated the communities where it established and precluded dominance by the introduced ostracod. Our experimental study supports the idea that niche availability and community interactions define community invasibility and does not support the application of a neutral community model for local food web management where predictions of exotic species impacts are needed.

Keywords

biodiversity-invasion relationships meiofauna niche resource availability sampling effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SM Bollens, JR Cordell, S Avent and R Hooff, Zooplankton invasions: a brief review, plus two case studies from the northeast Pacific Ocean. Hydrobiologia 480 (2002) 87-110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. L Brendonck and BJ Riddoch, Wind-bourne short-range egg dispersal in anostracans (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 67 (1999) 87-95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ML Brooks, Habitat invasibility and dominance by alien annual plants in the western Mojave desert. Biological Invasions 1 (1999) 323-337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. JE Byers and EG Noonburg, Scale dependent effects of biotic resistance to biological invasion. Ecology 84 (2003) 1428-1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. TJ Case, Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87 (1990) 9610-9614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. TJ Case, Global patterns in establishment of exotic birds. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 69-96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. MA Davis, JP Grime and K Thompson, Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88 (2000) 528-534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. JA Drake, Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. American Naturalist 137 (1991) 1-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CS Elton, The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. USA: Methuen (1958).Google Scholar
  10. T Herben, B Mandak, K Bimova and Z Muzbergova, Invasibility and species richness of a community: a neutral model and a survey of published data. Ecology 85 (2004) 3223-3233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. TA Holland and DG Jenkins, Comparison of processes regulating zooplankton assemblages in new freshwater pools. Hydrobiologia 387 (1998) 207-214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. MA Huston, Biological Diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1994).Google Scholar
  13. GE Hutchinson, Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals?. American Naturalist 155 (1959) 280-293Google Scholar
  14. DG Jenkins and AL Buikema Jr, Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function. Ecological Monographs 68 (1998) 421-443Google Scholar
  15. L Jiang and PJ Morin, Productivity gradients cause positive diversity–invasibility relationships in aquatic microbial communities. Ecology Letters 7 (2004) 1047-1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. J Kalff, Limnology: Inland Water Ecosystems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall (2002).Google Scholar
  17. JMH Knops, D Tilman, NM Haddad, S Naeem, CE Mitchell, J Haarstad, ME Ritchie, KM Howe, PB Reich, E Siemann and J Groth, Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecology Letters 2 (1999) 286-293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. J Kolasa, DA Drake, GR Huxel and CL Hewitt, Hierarchy underlies patterns of variability in species inhabiting natural microcosms. Oikos 77 (1996) 259-266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. R Law and RD Morton, Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology 77 (1996) 762-775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. JM Levine, Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288 (2000) 852-854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. JM Levine and CM D’Antonio, Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87 (1999) 15-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. WM Lonsdale, Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80 (1999) 1522-1536Google Scholar
  23. S Naeem, JMH Knops, D Tilman, KM Howe, T Kennedy and S Gale, Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91 (2000) 97-108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. S Nandini and SSS Sarma, Population growth of some genera of cladocerans (Cladocera) in relation to algal food (Chlorella vulgaris) levels. Hydrobiologia 491 (2003) 211-219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. TN Romanuk and J Kolasa, Abundance and species richness in natural aquatic microcosms: a test and refinement of the Niche-Limitation Hypothesis. Community Ecology 3 (2002) 87-94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ML Rosenzweig, Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171 (1971) 385-387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. GM Ruiz, JT Carlton, ED Grosholz and AH Hines, Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37 (1997) 621-632Google Scholar
  28. K Shea and P Chesson, Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 (2002) 170-176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. M Schuh and R Diesel, Breeding in a rock pool: larvae of the semiterrestrial crab Armases Sesarma miersii (Rathbun) (Decapoda: Grapsidae) develop in a highly variable environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 185 (1995) 109-129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. JJ Stachowicz, H Fried, RW Osman and RB Whitlatch, Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83 (2002) 2575-2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. TJ Stohlgren, D Binkley, GW Chong, MA Kalkhan, LD Schell, KA Bull, Y Otsuki, G Newman, M Bashkin and Y Son, Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69 (1999) 25-46Google Scholar
  32. A Symstad, A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. Ecology 81 (2000) 99-109Google Scholar
  33. TW Therrialt and J Kolasa, Physical determinants of richness, species richness, evenness, and abundance in natural aquatic microcosms. Hydrobiologia 412 (1999) 123-130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thorp JH and Covich AP (2001) Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, 2nd edn. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  35. DA Wardle, Experimental demonstration that plant diversity reduces invasibility – evidence of a biological mechanism or a consequence of sampling effect. Oikos 95 (2001) 161-170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. SK Wiser, RB Allen, PW Clinton and KH Platt, Community structure and forest invasion by an exotic herb over 23 years. Ecology 79 (1998) 2071-2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatrix E. Beisner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan Hovius
    • 2
  • April Hayward
    • 3
  • Jurek Kolasa
    • 3
  • Tamara N. Romanuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Quebec at MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations