Biological Invasions

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 651–653 | Cite as

Jellyfish on the Rocks: Bioinvasion Threat of the International Trade in Aquarium Live Rock



So-called “live rock” – coral rock that harbours a vast array of marine organisms that enhance the aesthetics and function of aquariums – is an increasingly valuable commodity in the aquarium industry. Live rock is primarily collected from the edges of reefs in the Indo-Pacific, where its export is an important source of revenue for many small subsistence communities. The trade in live rock is not subject to quarantine restrictions in its principal markets, yet poses a serious threat of bioinvasion because of the potential for inadvertent or deliberate release of the organisms that reside on its surfaces. This threat is demonstrated here by the transportation of jellyfish polyps of a species of Cassiopea (Upside-down jellyfish) on live rock imported to the USA from the Indo-Pacific. Jellyfish have recently come into the spotlight as significant bioinvaders. The transportation of jellyfish on live rock provides the first direct evidence of a translocation vector for these organisms. Invasive species are a principal threat to biodiversity and are responsible for enormous economic losses globally. The unregulated trade in live rock presents a serious bioinvasion risk that warrants the urgent attention of regulatory bodies.


aquarium trade bioinvasion invasive species jellyfish live rock 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailey PM, Little M, Jelinek GA and Wilce VA (2003). Jellyfish envenomation syndromes: unknown toxic mechanisms and unproven therapies. The Medical Journal of Australia 178: 34–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Best MB (1997) Trade in corals and living stones. In: den Hartog, JC, van Ofwegen, LP, van der Spoel, S (eds) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Coelenterate Biology. pp. 47–52Google Scholar
  3. Doelle M (2003). The Quiet Invasion: Legal and Policy Responses to Aquatic Invasive Species in North America. The International Journal of Marine Coastal Law 18(2): 261–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Graham WM, Martin DL, Felder DL and Asper VL (2003). Ecological and economic implications of a tropical jellyfish invader in the Gulf of Mexico. Biological Invasions 5: 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Larkin S and Degner R (2001). The U.S. Wholesale Market for Marine Ornamentals. Aquarium Sciences and Conservation 3(1–3): 13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mills C (2001). Jellyfish blooms: are populations increasing globally in response to changing ocean conditions. Hydrobiologia 451: 5–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pimental D, Lach L, Zuniga R and Morrison D (1999). Environmental and Economic Costs Associated with Non-indigenous Species in the United States. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Semmens BX, Buhle ER, Salomon AK and Pettengill-Semmens CV (2004). A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway. Marine Ecology Progress Series 266: 239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wabnitz C, Taylor M, Green E and Razak T (2003). From Ocean to Aquarium: The Global Trade in Marine Ornamental Species. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 1–65Google Scholar
  10. Wonham MJ, Carlton JT, Ruiz GM and Smith LD (2000). Fish and ships, relating dispersal frequency to success in biological invasions. Marine Biology 136: 111–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. WWF-South Pacific Programme. 2003. Available at (Accessed 12 Feb. 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lincoln Marine Science CentreThe Flinders UniversityPort LincolnAustralia
  2. 2.Dauphin Island Sea LabDauphin IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations