Biological Invasions

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 1409–1424

On the Numerous Concepts in Invasion Biology

  • Jannike Falk-Petersen
  • Thomas Bøhn
  • Odd Terje Sandlund
Review

Abstract

The study of biological invasions has triggered the production of a diversity of concepts. The terminology has, however, often been applied inconsistently and inaccurately. This article lists and assesses the most commonly used terms and concepts in invasion ecology. In each case the most coherent definition and use is suggested.

Key words

alien concepts exotic indigenous introduced invasion invasive native pest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M Allaby, Oxford Dictionary of Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1998).Google Scholar
  2. BW Allred and ES Clements, Dynamics of Vegetation. New York: H.W. Wilson Co. (1949).Google Scholar
  3. P Binggeli, The misuse of terminology and anthropometric concepts in the description of introduces species. Bulletin British Ecological Society 25 (1994) 10-13Google Scholar
  4. Bullock JM, Hodder KH, Manchester SJ and Stevenson MJ (1997) A review of information, policy and legislation on species translocation, 9 pp. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No. 261, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  5. CBD (2001) Convention on Biological Diversity, SBSTTA 6, Recommendation VI/4: Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species, Annex: interim guiding principles for the prevention, introduction and mitigation of impacts of alien species. Retrieved from http://www.biodiv.org/recommendations/default.aspx?lg=0&m=sbstta-06&r=04 on 12 July 2004Google Scholar
  6. CBD (2004) Invasive Alien Species. Retrieved from http://www.biodiv.org/programmes/cross-cutting/alien/ on 12 July 2004Google Scholar
  7. JL Chapman and MJ Reiss, Ecology: Principles and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999).Google Scholar
  8. JA Crooks, Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97 (2002) 153-166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CC Daehler, Two ways to be an invader, but one is more suitable for ecology. The Ecological Society of America. 82 (2001) 101-102Google Scholar
  10. MA Davis and K Thompson, Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invader: a proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. The Ecological Society of America 81 (2000) 101-102Google Scholar
  11. FAO glossary of photosanitary terms. FAO Plant Protection Bulletin 38 (1990) 5-23Google Scholar
  12. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries – Precautionary Approach to Capture Fisheries and Species Introductions – 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1996).Google Scholar
  13. Fisheries Management – 2. The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries 4, suppl. 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2003).Google Scholar
  14. FAO (2004) FAO Glossary. Retrieved from http://www. fao.org/glossary/ on 16 July 2004Google Scholar
  15. GBWMP-SA (2004) Global Ballast Water Management Programme (GloBallast) – South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.ballastwater-sa.org on 16 July 2004Google Scholar
  16. A Godman and EMF Payne, Longman Dictionary of Scientific Usage. Harlow: Longman Group Ltd. (1986).Google Scholar
  17. Moor IJ and Bruton MN (1988) Atlas of Alien and Translocated Indigenous Aquatic Animals in Southern Africa. South African National Scientific Programmes Report 144, 310 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. KR Hayes and C Sliwa, Identifying potential marine pests – a deductive approach applied to Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46 (2003) 91-98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. JS Holmes and JR Simons, The Introduction and Naturalisation of Birds. The Proceedings of the BOU’s 1995. Annual Conference (April 1995) Supported by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. London, UK: HmSO (1996).Google Scholar
  20. JS Holmes and DA Stroud, Naturalised birds: feral, exotic, introduced or alien. British Birds 88 (1995) 602-603Google Scholar
  21. ICES (1994) Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment. Annex 3. ICES Cooperative Research Report 204, 122 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Code of practice on the introductions and transfers of marine organisms 1994/ Code de conduite du CIEM pour les introductions et transfers d’organismes marins 1994. Copenhagen: ICES (1995).Google Scholar
  23. Code of Conduct for the Import and Release of Exotic Biological Control Agents. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1996).Google Scholar
  24. The IUCN Position Statement on Translocation of Living Organisms. Gland: International Conservation Union (IUCN) (1987).Google Scholar
  25. IUCN /SSC Guidelines for Re-introductions. Gland: IUCN (1995).Google Scholar
  26. IUCN Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive Species. Gland: IUCN (2000).Google Scholar
  27. International Plant Protection Convention. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1997).Google Scholar
  28. CG Jones, JH Lawton and M Shachak, Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78 (1997) 1946-1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. CS Kolar and DM Lodge, Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16 (2001) 199-204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. I Kowarik, Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biological Invasions 5 (2003) 293-312Google Scholar
  31. E Lawrence, Henderson’s Dictionary of Biological Terms. Harlow: Prentice Hall (2000).Google Scholar
  32. DH Les and LJ Mehrhoff, Introduction of nonindigenous aquatic vascular plants in southern New England: a historical perspective. Biological Invasions 1 (1999) 281-300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. JL Lockwood, D Simberloff, ML McKinney and B Holle Van, How many, and which, plants will invade natural areas?. Biological Invasions 3 (2001) 1-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. RN Mack, Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78 (1996) 107-121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NM Mack, Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biological Invasions 2 (2000) 111-122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. RN Mack, D Simberloff, WM Lonsdale, H Evans, M Clout and FA Bazzaz, Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 689-710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. SJ Manchester and JM Bullock, The impacts of non-native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. Journal of Applied Ecology 37 (2000) 845-864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. DE Marco, SA Păez and SA Cannas, Species invasiveness in biological invasions: a modelling approach. Biological Invasions 4 (2002) 193-205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. HA Mooney and RJ Hobbs, Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington: Island Press (2000).Google Scholar
  40. CG Moore, Aedes albopictus in the United States: current status and prospects for further spread. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 15 (1999) 221-227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. C Morris, Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology. San Diego: Academic Press (1992).Google Scholar
  42. V Mühlenbach, Contributions to the synanthropic (adventive) flora of the railroads in St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 66 (1979) 1-108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. NCC (1990) Review of NCC policy on species translocations in Great Britain. Unpublished report, Nature Conservancy Council. (NCC BS P9021). In: Bullock JM Hodder KH Manchester SJ and Stevenson MJ (1997) A review of information, policy and legislation on species translocation. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No. 261, Peterborough, 9 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. P Pyšek, On the terminology used in plant invasion studies. In: P Pyšek, K Prach, M Rejmánek and M Wade (eds.) Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing (1995) pp. 71-81Google Scholar
  45. JM Randall, Defining weeds of natural areas. In: JO Luken and JW Thieret (eds.) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York: Springer Verlag (1996) pp. 18-25Google Scholar
  46. DM Richardson, P Pyšek, M Rejmánek, MG Barbour, FD Panetta and CJ West, Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6 (2000) 93-107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. OT Sandlund and T Bongard, The freshwater environment. In: IR Weidema (ed.) Introduced Species in the Nordic Countries. Copenhagen: Nord Environment 2000: 13, Nordic Council of Ministers (2000) pp. 87-122Google Scholar
  48. MW Schwartz, Defining indigenous species: an introduction. In: JO Luken and JW Thieret (eds.) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York: Springer Verlag (1996) pp. 7-17Google Scholar
  49. AA Sher and LA Hyatt, The distribution resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biological Invasions 1 (1999) 107-114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. D Simberloff, MA Relva and M Nuňes, Gringos en el bosque: introduced tree invasion in a native Nothofagus/Austrovedrus forest. Biological Invasions 4 (2002) 35-53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. U Starfinger, I Kowarik, M Rode and H Schepker, From desirable ornamental plant to pest to accepted addition to the flora? – the perception on an alien tree species through the centuries. Biological Invasions 5 (2003) 323-335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutinen JG (2000) A framework for monitoring and assessing socioeconomics and governance of large marine ecosystems. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMF S-NE-158, 32 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. TS Talley and LA Levin, Modification of sediments and macrofauna by an invasive marsh plant. Biological Invasions 3 (2001) 51-68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wildlife Introductions to Great Britain. Peterboroguh, U.K.: Nature Conservancy Council (1979).Google Scholar
  55. United Nations (1997): Glossary of Environmental Statistics. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, 83 ppGoogle Scholar
  56. DA Webb, What are the criteria for presuming native status?. Watsonia 15 (1985) 231-236Google Scholar
  57. MJ Wells, RJ Poyton, AA Balsinhas, CF Musil, H Joffe, E Hoepen van and SK Abbott, The history of introduction of invasive alien plants to southern Africa. In: IAW Macdonald, FJ Kruger and AA Ferrar (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Biological Invasions in Southern Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press (1986) pp. 21-35Google Scholar
  58. M Williamson, Biological Invasions. London: Chapman & Hall (1996).Google Scholar
  59. M Williamson and A Fitter, The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77 (1996) 1661-1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. WWF (1976) Reintroductions: Techniques and Ethics. Proceedings of the Seminar, Rome, June 1976, 300 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jannike Falk-Petersen
    • 1
  • Thomas Bøhn
    • 2
  • Odd Terje Sandlund
    • 3
  1. 1.Norwegian College of Fishery ScienceUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Institute of Gene EcologyTromsøNorway
  3. 3.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations