Advertisement

Enhanced degradation of hydrocarbons by gamma ray induced mutant strain of Pseudomonas putida

  • Razia Tahseen
  • Muhammad ArslanEmail author
  • Samina Iqbal
  • Zafar M. Khalid
  • Muhammad AfzalEmail author
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Soil contamination due to petroleum hydrocarbons is a ubiquitous environmental problem for which efficient remediation alternatives are required. Application of hydrocarbons degrading bacteria with enhanced degradation potential is such an alternative. The aim of present investigation was to induce mutagenicity in Pseudomonas putida through gamma-ray irradiation for the enhanced degradation of crude oil. A total of mutant 10 bacterial strains (300A-J) were screened for their degradation abilities in vitro; among which the performance of 300-B was outstanding. Subsequently, spiked soil (30 g/kg crude oil) was augmented with the wild-type parent strain and mutant 300-B strain in individual experiments. Bacterial inoculation in both experiments enhanced hydrocarbons degradation; however, degradation was 46.3% higher when 300-B mutant strain was employed. This improved oil degradation was found to have a strong positive correlation with the gene abundance and expression of the mutant strain, suggesting its successful survival and catabolic potential in situ. Concomitantly, a better nutrients assimilation and water utilization was observed in the experiment containing 300-B mutant. Yet preliminary, these findings highlight the importance of gamma ray irradiation towards improved degradation potential of previously isolated hydrocarbons degrading bacteria.

Keywords

Pseudomonas putida Gamma ray mutation Biodegradation Crude oil Metabolic activity 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Higher Education Commission, Pakistan (Grant Number 20-3854/R&D/HEC/14).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afzal M, Yousaf S, Reichenauer TG, Kuffner M, Sessitsch A (2011) Soil type affects plant colonization, activity and catabolic gene expression of inoculated bacterial strains during phytoremediation of diesel. J Hazard Mater 186:1568–1575.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afzal M, Yousaf S, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2012) The inoculation method affects colonization and performance of bacterial inoculant strains in the phytoremediation of soil contaminated with diesel oil. Int J Phytoremediation 14:35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2011.552928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afzal M, Yousaf S, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2013) Ecology of alkane-degrading bacteria and their interaction with the plant. In: de Bruijn FJ (ed) Molecular Microbial Ecology of the Rhizosphere. Wiley, New York, pp 975–990.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118297674.ch92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Afzal M, Khan QM, Sessitsch A (2014) Endophytic bacteria: prospects and applications for the phytoremediation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere 117:232–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arslan M, Afzal M, Amin I, Iqbal S, Khan QM (2014) Nutrients can enhance the abundance and expression of alkane hydroxylase CYP153 gene in the rhizosphere of ryegrass planted in hydrocarbon-polluted soil. PLoS ONE 9(10):e111208.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arslan M, Imran A, Khan QM, Afzal M (2017) Plant–bacteria partnerships for the remediation of persistent organic pollutants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4322–4336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4935-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barles RW, Daughton CG, Hsieh DP (1979) Accelerated parathion degradation in soil inoculated with acclimated bacteria under field conditions. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 8:647–660.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bushnell LD, Haas HF (1941) The utilization of certain hydrocarbons by microorganisms. J Bacteriol 41:653–673Google Scholar
  9. Fatima K, Imran A, Khan QM, Afzal M (2015) Bacterial rhizosphere and endosphere populations associated with grasses and trees to be used for phytoremediation of crude oil contaminated soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94:314–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1489-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fatima K, Imran A, Amin I, Khan QM, Afzal M (2018) Successful phytoremediation of crude-oil contaminated soil at an oil exploration and production company by plants-bacterial synergism. Int J Phytoremediation 20:675–681.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1413331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gentry T, Rensing C, Pepper I (2004) New approaches for bioaugmentation as a remediation technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34:447–494.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380490452362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huma T, Rashid MH, Javed MR, Ashraf A (2012) Gamma ray mediated mutagenesis of Phialocephala humicola: Effect on kinetics and thermodynamics of a-amylase production. Afr J Microbiol Res 6:4639–4646.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.754 Google Scholar
  13. Hussain F, Tahseen R, Arslan M, Iqbal S, Afzal M (2018) Removal of hexadecane by hydroponic root mats in partnership with alkane-degrading bacteria: bacterial augmentation enhances system’s performance. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2165-1 Google Scholar
  14. Iqbal S, Khalid Z, Malik K (1995) Enhanced biodegradation and emulsification of crude oil and hyperproduction of biosurfactants by a gamma ray-induced mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Lett Appl Microbiol 21:176–179.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01035.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnsen AR, Karlson U (2005) PAH degradation capacity of soil microbial communities—does it depend on PAH exposure? Microb Ecol 50:488–495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-005-0022-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joy S, Rahman PK, Sharma S (2017) Biosurfactant production and concomitant hydrocarbon degradation potentials of bacteria isolated from extreme and hydrocarbon contaminated environments. Chem Eng J 317:232–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keeney D, Nelson D (1982) Nitrogen-Inorganic Forms. In: Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil analysis. Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 643–698Google Scholar
  18. Khan S, Afzal M, Iqbal S, Khan QM (2013a) Plant–bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Chemosphere 90:1317–1332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan S, Afzal M, Iqbal S, Mirza MS, Khan QM (2013b) Inoculum pretreatment affects bacterial survival, activity and catabolic gene expression during phytoremediation of diesel contaminated soil. Chemosphere 91:663–668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khattak KF, Simpson TJ (2008) Effect of gamma irradiation on the extraction yield, total phenolic content and free radical-scavenging activity of Nigella staiva seed. Food Chem 110:967–972.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirk JL, Klironomos JN, Lee H, Trevors JT (2005) The effects of perennial ryegrass and alfalfa on microbial abundance and diversity in petroleum contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 133:455–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mcguinness M, Dowling D (2009) Plant-associated bacterial degradation of toxic organic compounds in soil. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:2226–2247.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6082226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mnif S, Chamkha M, Labat M, Sayadi S (2011) Simultaneous hydrocarbon biodegradation and biosurfactant production by oilfield-selected bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 111:525–536.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05071.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pandey J, Chauhan A, Jain RK (2009) Integrative approaches for assessing the ecological sustainability of in situ bioremediation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:324–375.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raza ZA, Khan MS, Khalid ZM (2007) Evaluation of distant carbon sources in biosurfactant production by a gamma ray-induced Pseudomonas putida mutant. Process Biochem 42:686–692.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rehman K, Imran A, Amin I, Afzal M (2018) Inoculation with bacteria in floating treatment wetlands positively modulates the phytoremediation of oil field wastewater. J Hazard Mater 349:242–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rehman K, Imran A, Amin I, Afzal M (2019) Enhancement of oil field-produced wastewater remediation by bacterially-augmented floating treatment wetlands. Chemosphere 217:576–583.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rump HH, Krist H (1999) Laboratory manual for the examination of water, wastewater and soil. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Shabir G, Afzal M, Anwar F, Tahseen R, Khalid ZM (2008) Biodegradation of kerosene in soil by a mixed bacterial culture under different nutrient conditions. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 61:161–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tahseen R, Afzal M, Iqbal S, Shabir G, Khan QM, Khalid ZM, Banat IM (2016) Rhamnolipids and nutrients boost remediation of crude oil-contaminated soil by enhancing bacterial colonization and metabolic activities. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 115:192–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Beilen J, Funhoff E (2007) Alkane hydroxylases involved in microbial alkane degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0748-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Veen JA, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:121–135Google Scholar
  33. Yousaf S, Afzal M, Reichenauer TG, Brady CL, Sessitsch A (2011) Hydrocarbon degradation, plant colonization and gene expression of alkane degradation genes by endophytic Enterobacter ludwigii strains. Environ Pollut 159:2675–2683.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.05.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil and Environmental Biotechnology DivisionNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE)FaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Environmental Biotechnology DepartmentHelmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Biotechnology DepartmentIslamic International UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations