Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 553–558 | Cite as

A novel minimally invasive method for monitoring oxygen in microbial fuel cells

  • A. S. Vishwanathan
  • Govind Rao
  • S. Siva Sankara Sai
Original Research Paper

Abstract

Oxygen availability is a potential rate-limiting step in the bioelectrochemical process catalyzed by microbes in microbial fuel cells (MFC). Determination of oxygen availability using a minimally invasive oxygen sensor is advantageous in terms of ease of usage, maintenance and cost-effectiveness as compared to using conventional probe-type oxygen sensors. The utility of this method is substantiated by using this sensor to demonstrate the relationship between oxygen availability and current density. 10 % drop in oxygen concentration resulted in a concomitant drop in current density by about 36 %, further establishing the criticality of monitoring oxygen levels in the MFC. The detachable sensor membrane of the minimally invasive sensor confers multiple advantages. The novel method would enable real-time monitoring of oxygen in MFCs, simplify process optimization and validation and more importantly, provide an impetus for development of more efficient MFC designs.

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell Non-invasive oxygen sensor Oxygen availability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors dedicate this paper to Bhagawan Sri Sathya Sai Baba, the founding chancellor of the Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning. The NIO sensor donation from Fluorometrix is gratefully acknowledged. GR is a co-founder of Fluorometrix and has a conflict of interest.

References

  1. An J, Kim D, Chun Y, Lee S, Ng H, Chang I (2009) Floating-type microbial fuel cell (FT-MFC) for treating organic-contaminated water. Environ Sci Technol 43:1642–1647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bambot SB, Holavanahali R, Lakowicz JR, Carter GM, Rao G (1994) Phase fluorometric sterilizable optical oxygen sensor. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:1139–1145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biffinger JC, Byrd JN, Dudley BL, Ringeisen BR (2008) Oxygen exposure promotes fuel diversity for Shewanella oneidensis microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 23:820–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biffinger J, Ribbens M, Ringeisen B, Pietron J, Finkel S, Nealson K (2009) Characterization of electrochemically active bacteria utilizing a high-throughput voltage-based screening assay. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:436–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006) Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ Sci Technol 40:2426–2432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debabov VG (2008) Electricity from microorganisms. Microbiology (Russia) 77:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freguia S, Rabaey K, Yuan Z, Keller J (2007) Non-catalyzed cathodic oxygen reduction at graphite granules in microbial fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 53:598–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ge X, Hanson M, Shen H, Kostov Y, Brorson KA, Frey DD, Moreira AR, Rao G (2006) Validation of an optical sensor-based high-throughput bioreactor system for mammalian cell culture. J Biotechnol 122:293–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta A, Rao G (2003) A study of oxygen transfer in shake flasks using a non-invasive oxygen sensor. Biotechnol Bioeng 84:351–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson MA, Ge X, Kostov Y, Brorson KA, Moreira AR, Rao G (2007) Comparisons of optical pH and dissolved oxygen sensors with traditional electrochemical probes during mammalian cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:833–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jang JK, Chang IS, Hwang HY, Choo YF, Lee JY, Cho KS, Kim BH, Nealson KH (2010) Electricity generation coupled to oxidation of propionate in a microbial fuel cell. Biotechnol Lett 32:79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kermis HR, Kostov Y, Harms P, Rao G (2002) Dual excitation ratiometric fluorescent pH sensor for noninvasive bioprocess monitoring: development and application. Biotechnol Prog 18:1047–1053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim BH, Chang IS, Gil GC, Park HS, Kim HJ (2003) Novel BOD (biological oxygen demand) sensor using mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biotechnol Lett 25:541–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim BH, Chang IS, Gadd GM (2007) Challenges in microbial fuel cell development and operation. Appl Microbiol 76:485–494Google Scholar
  15. Larrosa A, Lozano LJ, Katuri KP, Head I, Scott K, Godinez C (2009) On the repeatability and reproducibility of experimental two-chambered microbial fuel cells. Fuel 88:1852–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu J, Mattiasson B (2002) Microbial BOD sensors for wastewater analysis. Water Res 36:3786–3802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Logan BE (2010) Scaling up microbial fuel cells and other bioelectrochemical systems. Appl Microbiol 85:1665–1671Google Scholar
  18. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schroder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40:5181–5192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mariolakos I, Fountoulis I, Andreadakis E, Kapourani E (2007) Real-time monitoring on Evrotas River (Laconia, Greece): dissolved oxygen as a critical parameter for environmental status classification and warning. Desalination 213:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell T (2006) Luminescence based measurement of dissolved oxygen in natural waters. www.hachenvironmental.com. Accessed 17 Aug 2012
  21. Moon H, Chang IS, Jang JK, Kim JS, Lee J, Lovitt RW, Kim BH (2005) On-line monitoring of low biochemical oxygen demand through continuous operation of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. J Microbiol Biotechnol 15:192–196Google Scholar
  22. Oh S, Min B, Logan BE (2004) Cathode performance as a factor in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 38:4900–4904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randers-Eichhorn L, Bartlett RA, Frey DD, Rao G (1996) Noninvasive oxygen measurements and mass transfer considerations in tissue culture flasks. Biotechnol Bioeng 51:466–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rao G, Moreira A, Brorson K (2009) Disposable bioprocessing: the future has arrived. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:348–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tolosa L, Kostov Y, Harms P, Rao G (2002) Noninvasive measurement of dissolved oxygen in shake flasks. Biotechnol Bioeng 80:594–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trettnak W, Gruber W, Reininger F, Klimant I (1995) Recent progress in optical oxygen sensor instrumentation. Sens Actuators B Chem 29:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang HY, Bernarda A, Huang C, Lee DJ, Chang JS (2011) Micro-sized microbial fuel cell: a mini-review. Bioresour Technol 102:235–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao F, Harnisch F, Schroder U, Scholz F, Bogdanoff P, Herrman I (2006) Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 40:5193–5199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Vishwanathan
    • 1
  • Govind Rao
    • 2
  • S. Siva Sankara Sai
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiosciencesSri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Prasanthi NilayamPuttaparthiIndia
  2. 2.Center for Advanced Sensor Technology, Department of Chemical, Biochemical and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsSri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Prasanthi NilayamPuttaparthiIndia

Personalised recommendations