Advertisement

Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 187–195 | Cite as

Foam mitigation and exploitation in biosurfactant production

  • J. B. Winterburn
  • P. J. MartinEmail author
Review

Abstract

Biosurfactants could potentially outperform traditional surfactants in many applications whilst being more sustainable to source, manufacture, use and dispose of. However, currently available fermentation production methods are too inefficient to manufacture biosurfactants for these high volume markets. Foaming in an inherent issue with biosurfactant production and adds significantly to the cost of production using traditional unit operations. This review illustrates how the application of process engineering has enabled nuisance foaming to be transformed into a cost saving feature of the production system. The scope of biosurfactants and their application is discussed and the fundamentals of foam generation and control are reviewed. The range of specific phenomena associated with the interaction of foams with bioproducts is assessed. Finally, recent work which has aimed at taking advantage of some of these phenomena in order to intensify the biosurfactant production process is discussed in detail.

Keywords

Biosurfactant Foam fractionation Separation White biotechnology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge support through an EPSRC PhD Plus award which facilitated this review.

References

  1. Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Lépine F, Déziel E (2010) Rhamnolipids: diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles. Appl Microbiol Biot 86:1323–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angarska ZhK, Elenskyi AA, Yampolskaya GP, Tachev KD (2011) Foam films from mixed solutions of bovine serum albumin and n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside. Colloid Surface A 382:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banat IM, Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, Bestetti G, Martinotti MG, Fracchia L, Smyth TJ, Marchant R (2010) Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Appl Microbiol Biot 87:427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camilios-Neto D, Bugay C et al (2011) Production of rhamnolipids in solid-state cultivation using a mixture of sugarcane bagasse and corn bran supplemented with glycerol and soybean oil. Appl Microbiol Biot 89:1395–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen CY, Baker SC, Darton RC (2006a) Batch production of biosurfactant with foam fractionation. J ChemTechnol Biot 81:1923–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CY, Baker SC, Darton RC (2006b) Continuous production of biosurfactant with foam fractionation. J ChemTechnol Biot 81:1915–1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarkson JR, Cui ZF, Darton RC (1999) Protein denaturation in foam: II. Surface activity and conformational change. J Colloid Interf Sci 215:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis DA, Lynch HC, Varley J (2001) The application of foaming for the recovery of surfactin from B. subtilis ATCC 21332 cultures. Enzyme Microb Tech 28:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deleu M, Paquot M (2004) From renewable vegetables resources to microorganisms: new trends in surfactants. Comptes Rendus Chimie 7:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desai JD, Banat IM (1997) Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:47–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhanasekharan KM, Sanyal J, Jain A, Haidari A (2005) A generalized approach to model oxygen transfer in bioreactors using population balances and computational fluid dynamics. Chem Eng Sci 60:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etoc A, Delvigne F, Lecomte JP, Thonart P (2006) Foam control in fermentation bioprocess: from simple aeration tests to bioreactor. App Biochem Biotech 130:392–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernsler JG, Zasadzinski JA (2009) Competitive adsorption: a physical model for lung surfactant inactivation. Langmuir 25:8131–8143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, Bestetti G, Smyth TJP, Banat IM (2010) Production and applications of trehalose lipid biosurfactants. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 112:617–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garrett PR (1993) Recent developments in the understanding of foam generation and stability. Chem EngSci 48:367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gharaei-Fathabad E (2011) Biosurfactants in pharmaceutical industry: a mini-review. Am J Drug Discov Devel 1:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heyd M, Franzreb M, Berensmeier S (2011) Continuous rhamnolipid production with integrated product removal by foam fractionation and magnetic separation of immobilized Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biotechnol Progr 27:706–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iyer A, Mody K, Jha B (2006) Emulsifying properties of a marine bacterial exopolysaccharide. Enzyme Microb Tech 38:220–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Junker B (2007) Foam and its mitigation in fermentation systems. Biotechnol Progr 23:767–784Google Scholar
  20. Lemlich R, (1972) Adsorptive Bubble Separation Techniques. Academic Press, New York, USA:1–49Google Scholar
  21. Liu W, Zheng H, Wu Z, Wang Y (2010) Effects of pH profiles on nisin fermentation coupling with foam separation. Appl Microbiol Biot 85:1401–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin PJ, Dutton HM, Winterburn JB, Baker S, Russell AB (2010) Foam fractionation with reflux. Chem Eng Sci 65:3825–3835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Middelberg APJ, Dimitrijev-Dwyer M (2011) A designed biosurfactant protein for switchable foam control. Chem Phys Chem 12:1426–1429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller CA (2008) Antifoaming in aqueous foams. Curr Opin Colloid In 13:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nitschke M, Costa SGVAO (2007) Biosurfactants in food industry. Trends Food Sci Tech 18:252–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarachat T, Pornsunthorntawee O, Chavadej S, Rujiravanit R (2010) Purification and concentration of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa SP4 using foam fractionation. Bioresource Technol 101:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh A, Van Hamme JD, Ward OP (2007) Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv 25:99–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh P, Cameotra SS (2004) Potential applications of microbial surfactants in biomedical sciences. Trends Biotechnol 22:142–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stevnson P, Li X, Evans GM (2008) A mechanism for internal reflux in foam fractionation. Biochem Eng J 39:590–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stocks SM, Cooke M, Heggs PJ (2005) Inverted hollow spinning cone as a device for controlling foam and hold-up in pilot scale gassed agitated fermentation vessels. Chem Eng Sci 60:2231–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanaka Y, Takashi T, Kazuhik U (1997) Method of producing iturin A and antifungal agent for profound mycosis. Biotechnol Adv 15:234–235Google Scholar
  32. Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP (2006) Physiological aspects. (Part 1 in a series of papers devoted to surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology). Biotechnol Adv 24:604–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Hee P, Elumbaring ACMR, van der Lans RGJM, Van der Wielen LAM (2006) Selective recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoate inclusion bodies from fermentation broth by dissolved-air flotation. J Colloid Interf Sci 297:595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wessels JGH (1996) Hydrophobins: proteins that change the nature of the fungal surface. Adv Microb Physiol 38:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Winterburn JB, Martin PJ (2008) Mechanisms of ultrasound foam interactions. Asia Pa J Chem Eng 4:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winterburn JB, Russell AB, Martin PJ (2011a) Characterisation of HFBII biosurfactant production and foam fractionation with and without antifoaming agents. Appl Microbiol Biot 90:911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winterburn JB, Russell AB, Martin PJ (2011b) Integrated recirculating foam fractionation for the continuous recovery of biosurfactant from fermenters. Biochem Eng J 54:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoo YJ, Hong J (1986) Bubble entrainment aeration for high foaming fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:756–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Q, Lo C-M, Ju L-K (2007) Factors affecting foaming behavior in cellulase fermentation by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. Bioresour Technol 98(4):753–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical ScienceThe Mill, The University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations