Skip to main content
Log in

Expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells on microcarriers

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects on human mesenchymal stem cell growth of choosing either of two spinner flask impeller geometries, two microcarrier concentrations and two cell concentrations (seeding densities) were investigated. Cytodex 3 microcarriers were not damaged when held at the minimum speed, NJS, for their suspension, using either impeller, nor was there any observable damage to the cells. The maximum cell density was achieved after 8–10 days of culture with up to a 20-fold expansion in terms of cells per microcarrier. An increase in microcarrier concentration or seeding density generally had a deleterious or neutral effect, as previously observed for human fibroblast cultures. The choice of impeller was significant, as was incorporation of a 1 day delay before agitation to allow initial attachment of cells. The best conditions for cell expansion on the microcarriers in the flasks were 3,000 microcarriers ml−1 (ca. 1 g dry weight l−1), a seeding density of 5 cells per microcarrier with a 1 day delay before agitation began at NJS (30 rpm), using a horizontally suspended flea impeller with an added vertical paddle. These findings were interpreted using Kolmogorov’s theory of isotropic turbulence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abranches E, Bekman E, Henrique D, Cabral JMS (2007) Expansion of mouse embryonic stem cells on microcarriers. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:1211–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allegrucci C, Young LE (2007) Differences between human embryonic stem cell lines. Hum Reprod Update 13:103–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker C, Culme-Seymour E, Dalton S, Hayek A, Genbacev O (2011) The year in regenerative medicine. Regen Med 6:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler M (1996) Cell line and culture monitoring. The basics: animal cell culture and technology. IRL Press, New York, pp 33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry RS, Papoutsakis ET (1986) Hydrodynamic effects on cells in agitated tissue culture reactors. Bioprocess Eng 1:28–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry RS, Papoutsakis ET (1988) Physical mechanisms of cell damage in microcarrier cell culture bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:1001–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croughan MS, Hamel J-F, Wang DIC (1987) Hydrodynamic effects on animal cells grown in microcarrier cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 29:130–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croughan MS, Hamel J-F, Wang DIC (1988) Effect of microcarrier concentration in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:975–982

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croughan MS, Sayre ES, Wang DIC (1989) Viscous reduction of turbulent damage in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 33:862–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenschuh S, Reichmann E, Ibold Y, Goetz PM, Sittinger M, Ringe J (2007) A microcarrier-based cultivation system for expansion of primary mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol Prog 23:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GE Healthcare (2009) Cytodex™ surface microcarriers. Data file 18-1060-61 AF

  • Hu WS, Meier J, Wang DIC (1985) A mechanistic analysis of the inoculum requirement for the cultivation of mammalian cells on microcarriers. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:585–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim S, Nienow AW (2004) Suspension of microcarriers for cell culture with axial flow impellers. Chem Eng Res Des 82:1082–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kresta SM, Brodkey RS (2004) Turbulence in mixing applications. In: Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM (eds) Handbook of industrial mixing, Chap 2. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, pp 19–87

  • Kumar N, Gammell P, Meleady P, Henry M, Clynes M (2008) Differential protein expression following low temperature culture of suspension cho-k1 cells. BMC Biotechnol 8:42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata S (1975) Mixing; principles and applications. Kodansha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nienow AW (1997a) The suspension of solid particles. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow (eds) Mixing in the process industries, Chap 16, 2nd edn (paperback revision). Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 364–393

  • Nienow AW (1997b) The mixer as a reactor — liquid/solid systems. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow (eds) Mixing in the process industries, Chap17, 2nd edn (paperback revision). Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 394–411

  • Nienow AW (2006) Reactor engineering in large scale animal cell culture. Cytotechnology 50:9–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nienow AW (2010) Impeller selection: animal cell culture, In: Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology, vol 5. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 2959–2971

  • Nienow AW, Conti R (1978) Particle abrasion at high solids concentration in stirred vessels. Chem Eng Sci 33:1077–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh SKW, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN (1992) Further studies of the culture of mouse hybridomas in an agitated bioreactor with and without continuous sparging. J Biotechnol 22:245–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh SK, Chen AK, Mok Y, Chen X, Lim UM, Chin A, Choo AB, Reuveny S (2009) Long-term microcarrier suspension cultures of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 2:219–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM (2004) Handbook of industrial mixing. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton JH, Costich EW, Everett HJ (1950) Power characteristics of mixing impellers. Chem Eng Prog. 46:467–471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schutt C, Furll B, Stelter F, Jack RS, Witt S (1997) CHO transfectants produce large amounts of recombinant protein in suspension culture. J Immunol Methods 204:99–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sucosky P, Osorio DF, Brown JB, Neitzel GP (2004) Fluid mechanics of a spinner-flask bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 85:34–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CR, Zhang Z (1998) The effect of hydrodynamics on biological material. In: Galindo E, Ramirez OT (eds) Advances in bioprocess engineering. Kluwer, London, pp 137–169

  • Thomson H (2007) Bioprocessing of embryonic stem cells for drug discovery. Trends Biotechnol 25:224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkat RV, Stock LR, Chalmers JJ (1996) Study of hydrodynamic in microcarrier culture spinner vessels: a particle tracking velocimetry approach. Biotechnol Bioeng 49:456–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK) and Smith and Nephew (York, UK) for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Hewitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewitt, C.J., Lee, K., Nienow, A.W. et al. Expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells on microcarriers. Biotechnol Lett 33, 2325–2335 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0695-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0695-4

Keywords

Navigation