Biodiesel production with microalgae as feedstock: from strains to biodiesel
- 2.8k Downloads
Due to negative environmental influence and limited availability, petroleum-derived fuels need to be replaced by renewable biofuels. Biodiesel has attracted intensive attention as an important biofuel. Microalgae have numerous advantages for biodiesel production over many terrestrial plants. There are a series of consecutive processes for biodiesel production with microalgae as feedstock, including selection of adequate microalgal strains, mass culture, cell harvesting, oil extraction and transesterification. To reduce the overall production cost, technology development and process optimization are necessary. Genetic engineering also plays an important role in manipulating lipid biosynthesis in microalgae. Many approaches, such as sequestering carbon dioxide from industrial plants for the carbon source, using wastewater for the nutrient supply, and maximizing the values of by-products, have shown a potential for cost reduction. This review provides a brief overview of the process of biodiesel production with microalgae as feedstock. The methods associated with this process (e.g. lipid determination, mass culture, oil extraction) are also compared and discussed.
KeywordsBiodiesel Lipid Microalgae Transesterification
We acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation (no. 30970262) and the Major S&T Projects on the Cultivation of New Varieties of Genetically Modified Organisms (Grant 2009ZX08009-120B). We are grateful to Prof. Ratledge and Archer for valuable suggestions on the manuscript, and the referees who made a great effort to improve it. We are also grateful to Prof. Robert Haselkorn (University of Chicago) for his kind help in improving the manuscript. We apologize to colleagues whose original work has not been cited or replaced by reviews, due to space limitation.
- Bruton T, Lyons H, Lerat Y, Stanley M, BoRasmussen M (2009) A review of the potential of marine algae as a source of biofuel in Ireland. Sustain Energy Irel 30–31Google Scholar
- Elmaleh S, Coma J, Grasmick A, Bourgade L (1991) Magnesium induced algal flocculation in a fluidized bed. Water Sci Technol 23:1695–1702Google Scholar
- Golueke CG, Oswald WJ (1965) Harvesting and processing sewage grown planktonic algae. J Water Pollut Control Fed 37:471–498Google Scholar
- Gudin C, Therpenier C (1986) Bioconversion of solar energy into organic chemicals by microalgae. Adv Biotechnol Process 6:73–110Google Scholar
- Iwasaki I, Hu Q, Kurano N, Miyachi S (1998) Effect of extremely high-CO2 stress on energy distribution between photosystem I and photosystem II in a ‘high-CO2’ tolerant green alga. Chlorococcum littorale and the intolerant green alga Stichococcus bacillaris. J Photochem Photobiol B44:184–190Google Scholar
- Jiang JQ, Graham NJD, Harward C (1993) Comparison of polyferric sulphate with other coagulants for the removal of algae and algae-derived organic matter. Water Sci Technol 27:221–230Google Scholar
- Prakash J, Pushparaj B, Carlozzi P, Torzillo G, Montaini E, Materassi R (1997) Microalgal biomass drying by a simple solar device. Int J Solar Energy 18:303–311Google Scholar
- Richmond A (2004) Biological principals of mass cultivation. In: Richmond A (ed) Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology, applied phycology. Blackwell Science, London, pp 125–177Google Scholar
- Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P (1998) A look back at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program: biodiesel from algae. TP-580-24190. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, GoldenGoogle Scholar
- Tenney MW, Echelberger WF, Schuessler RG, Pavoni JL (1969) Algal flocculation with synthetic organic polyelectrolytes. Appl Bacteriol 18:965–971Google Scholar