Advertisement

Biotechnology Letters

, 30:1959 | Cite as

Cathodic reduction of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] coupled with electricity generation in microbial fuel cells

  • Gang Wang
  • Liping Huang
  • Yifeng Zhang
Original Research Paper

Abstract

A novel approach to Cr(VI)-contaminated wastewater treatment was investigated using microbial fuel cell technologies in fed-batch mode. By using synthetic Cr(VI)-containing wastewater as catholyte and anaerobic microorganisms as anodic biocatalyst, Cr(VI) at 100 mg/l was completely removed during 150 h (initial pH 2). The maximum power density of 150 mW/m2 (0.04 mA/cm2) and the maximum open circuit voltage of 0.91 V were generated with Cr(VI) at 200 mg/l as electron acceptor. This work verifies the possibility of simultaneous electricity production and cathodic Cr(VI) reduction.

Keywords

Cr(VI) reduction Electron acceptor Microbial fuel cell Power density 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of the Ministry of Education for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars [2004–527] and the Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering of the Ministry of Education of China.

References

  1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng SA, Dempsey BA, Logan BE (2007) Electricity generation from synthetic acid-mine drainage (AMD) water using fuel cell technologies. Environ Sci Technol 41:8149–8153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clauwaert P, Rabaey K, Aelterman P, Schamphelaire LD, Pham TH, Boeckx P, Boon N, Verstraete W (2007) Biological denitrification in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41:3354–3360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. He Z, Angenent LT (2006) Application of bacterial biocathodes in microbial fuel cells. Electroanal 18(19–20):2009–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang LP, Angelidaki I (2008) Effect of humic acids on electricity generation integrated with xylose degradation in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 100(3):413–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang LP, Logan BE (2008) Electricity generation and treatment of paper recycling wastewater using a microbial fuel cell. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1546-7
  7. Huang LP, Zeng RJ, Angelidaki I (2008) Electricity production from xylose using a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 99:4178–4184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Humphries AC, Nott KP, Hall LD, Macaskie LE (2004) Continuous removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution catalyzed by palladised biomass of Desulfovibrio vulgaris. Biotechnol Lett 26:1529–1532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurniawan TA, Chan GYS, Lo WH, Babel S (2006) Comparisons of low cost adsorbents for treating wastewaters laden with heavy metals. Sci Total Environ 366:409–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu H, Cheng SA, Huang LP, Logan BE (2008) Scale-up of membrane-free single-chamber microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 179:274–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Logan BE, Cheng S, Watson V, Estadt G (2007) Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41:3341–3346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lovley DR, Phillips EJP (1988) Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1472–1480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Min B, Logan BE (2004) Continuous electricity generation from domestic wastewater and organic substrates in a flat plate microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 38:5809–5814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oh SE, Min B, Logan BE (2004) Cathode performance as a factor in electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 38(18):4900–4904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Park DH, Zeikus JG (2000) Electricity generation in microbial fuel cells using neutral red as an electronophore. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1292–1297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Park D, Yun Y, Park J (2004) Reduction of hexavalent chromium with the brown seaweed Ecklonia biomass. Environ Sci Technol 38:4860–4864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park D, Yun Y, Kima J, Park J (2008) How to study Cr(VI) biosorption: use of fermentation waste for detoxifying Cr(VI) in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 136:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tartakovsky B, Guiot S (2006) A comparison of air and hydrogen peroxide oxygenated microbial fuel cell reactors. Biotechnol Prog 22:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang XS, Li ZZ, Tao SR (2008) Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using walnut hull. J Environ Manage. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.011
  20. You S, Zhao Q, Zhang J, Jiang J, Zhao S (2006) A microbial fuel cell using permanganate as the cathodic electron acceptor. J Power Sources 162:1409–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zuo Y, Cheng S, Call D, Logan BE (2007) Tubular membrane cathodes for scalable power generation in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41:3347–3353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zuo Y, Xing D, Regan JM, Logan BE (2008) An exoelectrogenic bacterium Ochrobactrum anthropi YZ-1 isolated using a U-tube microbial fuel cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3130–3137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Ministry of Education (MOE), School of Environmental and Biological Science & TechnologyDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations