Biotechnology Letters

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 427–433

Characterisation of bacterial adhesion and removal in a flow chamber by micromanipulation measurements

  • Trevor Roger Garrett
  • Manmohan Bhakoo
  • Zhibing Zhang
Original Research Paper


Flow device analyses and micromanipulation were used to assess the adhesive and cohesive integrity of the immobilised bacterial populations (biomass) of Pseudomonas fluorescens, which were harvested at different growth times and applied to a substrate made of stainless steel subsequently accommodated in a specially designed flow chamber. After the biomass was exposed to a fluidic environment for a period of time, the biomass samples were removed from the flow chamber and the apparent adhesion and cohesion of the remaining biomass was measured using a micromanipulation technique. The surface area of the substrate covered by the biomass exposed to the fluid flow was monitored by a digital camera and then quantified by image analysis. The results indicate a strong correlation between micromanipulation measurements and flow chamber experiments. The micromanipulation data show that the apparent adhesive strength of the biomass increased with the growth time. Moreover, the apparent adhesive strength was found to be stronger than the bacterial cohesive strength. The data was used to interpret the removal behaviour of the biomass from the flow chamber. Using these techniques, specific mechanisms of biomass detachment from a surface and optimised cleaning strategies can be postulated.


Adhesion Biofilm Cleaning Flow device Micromanipulation Pseudomonas fluorescens 


  1. Chen MJ, Zhang Z, Bott TR (1998) Direct measurement of the adhesive strength of biofilms in pipes by micromanipulation. Biotechnol Techn 12:875–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen MJ, Zhang Z, Bott TR (2005) Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes. Colloids Surf B Biointerf 43:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duddridge J, Kent CA, Laws JF (1982) Effects of surface shear stress on the attachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens to stainless steel under defined flow conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:153–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Heydorn A, Ersboll B, Hentzer M et al (2000) Experimental reproducibility in flow-chamber biofilms. Microbiology 146:2409–2415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jass J, Lappin-Scott H (1997) Microbial biofilms in industry: wanted dead or alive. Chem Ind 16:682–685Google Scholar
  6. Liu W, Christian GK, Zhang Z, Fryer P (2002) Development and use of a micromanipulation technique for measuring the force required to disrupt and remove fouling deposits. Trans Inst Chem Eng 80:286–291Google Scholar
  7. Liu W, Christian GK, Zhang Z, Fryer P (2006) Direct measurement of the force required to disrupt and remove fouling deposits of whey protein concentrate. Int Diary J 16:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McClaine J, Ford R (2002) Characterizing the adhesion of motile and nonmotile Escherichia coli to glass surface using a parallel-plate flow chamber. Biotechnol Bioeng 78:179–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ohashi A, Harada HA (1996) Novel concept for evaluation of biofilm adhesion strength by applying tensile force and shear force. Water Sci Technol 34:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmid T, Panne U, Adams J, Nessner R (2004) Investigation of biocide efficacy by photoacoustic biofilm monitoring. Water Res 38:1189–1196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z, Boyle J, Lappin-Scott H (1999) Structural deformation of bacterial biofilms caused by short-term fluctuations in fluid shear: an in situ investigation of biofilm rheology. Biotechnol Bioeng 65:83–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L, Scott H (2001) Detachment, surface migration, and other dynamic behaviour in bacterial biofilms revealed by digital time-lapse imaging. Methods Enzymol 337:306–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ et al (2002) Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29:361–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Verran J, Jones M (2000) Problems of biofilms in the food and beverage industry. In: Walker J, Surman S, Jass J (eds) Industrial biofouling. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trevor Roger Garrett
    • 1
  • Manmohan Bhakoo
    • 2
  • Zhibing Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Formulation Engineering, Chemical Engineering, School of EngineeringThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Unilever R&D Port SunlightMerseysideUK

Personalised recommendations