Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR
- First Online:
- 3.3k Downloads
Relative quantification in quantitative real-time RT-PCR is increasingly used to quantify gene expression changes. In general, two different relative mRNA quantification models exist: the delta-delta Ct and the efficiency-corrected Ct model. Both models have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of simplification on the one hand and efficiency correction on the other. The particular problem of RNA integrity and its effect on relative quantification in qRT-PCR performance was tested in different bovine tissues and cell lines (n = 11). Therefore different artificial and standardized RNA degradation levels were used. Currently fully automated capillary electrophoresis systems have become the new standard in RNA quality assessment. RNA quality was rated according the RNA integrity number (RIN). Furthermore, the effect of different length of amplified products and RNA integrity on expression analyses was investigated. We found significant impact of RNA integrity on relative expression results, mainly on cycle threshold (Ct) values and a minor effect on PCR efficiency. To minimize the interference of RNA integrity on relative quantification models, we can recommend to normalize gene expression by an internal reference gene and to perform an efficiency correction. Results demonstrate that innovative new quantification methods and normalization models can improve future mRNA quantification.
KeywordsGene expression study Ct mRNA qRT-PCR real-time RT-PCR RNA integrity RNA integrity number (RIN)
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Lightfood S (2002) Quantitation comparison of total RNA using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer, ribogreen analysis and UV spectrometry. Agilent Technologies, Technical Rep 5988-7650ENGoogle Scholar
- Mueller O, Lightfoot S, Schroeder A (2004) RNA Integrity Number (RIN)—Standardization of RNA Quality Control. Agilent Technologies, Technical Report 5989-1165ENGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual, (2nd edn.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NYGoogle Scholar