Advertisement

Biochemical Genetics

, Volume 48, Issue 9–10, pp 727–736 | Cite as

Assessment of Genetic Relatedness of Crossbred Chicken Populations Using Microsatellite Markers

  • Rudra Nath ChatterjeeEmail author
  • Tarun K. Bhattacharya
  • Meenakshi Dange
  • U. Rajkumar
Article

Abstract

To measure genetic relatedness between populations, for breeding purposes, we analyzed 170 birds from six crossbred populations of three pure lines of White Leghorn chickens, using 14 microsatellite markers. All the microsatellites were polymorphic, with 2–6 alleles. The mean number of alleles per locus was 3.21. The effective number of alleles varied from 1.14 to 3.94. The observed heterozygosity varied from 0.133 to 1.00, with a mean of 0.748. The F IS values were mostly negative, with an average of −0.345. The mean F ST value was 0.056. The Nm values ranged from 1.91 to 42.17. The highest genetic identity was observed between IWI × IWK and IWK × IWI. The relation between any two groups of crosses was more than 85%. The results suggest that the crossbred populations were very closely related.

Keywords

Genetic closeness Microsatellites Crossbred population Diallel crosses 

References

  1. Bhattacharya TK, Rani S, Maiti SK, Dayal S, Kumar P, Sharma A (2007) Polymorphism of ZuBeCa3 microsatellite and its association with mammary tumor in dogs. Int J Immunogenet 33:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng HH, Levin I, Vallejo RL, Khatib H, Dodgson JB, Crittenden LB, Hillel J (1995) Development of a genetic map of the chicken with markers of high utility. Poult Sci 74:1855–1874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crooijmans RPMA, Groen AF, Van Kampen AJA, van der Beek S, van der Poel JJ, Groenen MAM (1996) Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poult Sci 75:904–909PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Flock D, Preisinger R (2002) Breeding plan for poultry with emphasis on sustainability. In: Seventh World Conference on Genetic Applications for Livestock Production, 19–23 August, Montpelliers, FranceGoogle Scholar
  5. Hillel J, Groenen AM, Biochard MT, Korol AB, David L, Kirzhner VM, Burke T, Dirie AB, Crooijmans RPMA, Elo K, Feldman MW, Freidlin PJ, Tanila AM, Oortwijn M, Thomson P, Vignal A, Wimmers K, Weigend S (2003) Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet Sel Evol 35:533–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nevo E (1978) Genetic variation in natural populations: patterns and theory. Theor Popul Biol 13:21–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Olowofeso O, Wang JY, Dail GJ, Yang Y, Mekki DM, Musa HH (2005) Measurement of genetic parameters within and between Haimen chicken populations using microsatellite markers. Int J Poult Sci 4:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Osman SA, Sekino M, Nishibori M, Kawamoto Y, Kinoshita K, Yamamoto Y, Tsudzuki M (2004) Genetic variability and relationships of Japanese native chickens assessed by means of microsatellite profiling approach, focussing on the Oh-Shamo (Japanese large game) and its related breeds. J Poult Sci 41:94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pandey AK, Kumar Dinesh, Sharma R, Sharma U, Vijh RK, Ahlawat SPS (2005) Population structure and genetic bottleneck analysis of Ankleshwar poultry breed by microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 18:915–921Google Scholar
  11. Pirany N, Romanov MN, Ganpule SP, Devegowda G, Prasad DT (2007) Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in Indian chicken populations. J Poult Sci 44:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rajkumar U, Gupta BR, Reddy AR (2008) Genomic heterogeneity of chicken populations in India. Asian, Aust J Anim SciGoogle Scholar
  13. Romanov MN, Weigend S (2001) Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and Red Jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. Poult Sci 80:1057–1063PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol 1, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Takahashi H, Nakamura A (2007) Genetic diversity and differentiation of the Nagoya breed inferred from microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. J Poult Sci 44:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wimmers K, Ponsuksili S, Hardge T, Valle-Zarate A, Mathur PK, Horst P (2000) Genetic distances of African, Asian and South American local chickens. Anim Genet 31:159–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu YB, Wang JY, Mekki DM, Tang QP, Li HF (2006) Evaluation of genetic diversity and genetic distance between twelve Chinese indigenous chicken breeds based on microsatellite markers. Int J Poult Sci 5:550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rudra Nath Chatterjee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tarun K. Bhattacharya
    • 1
  • Meenakshi Dange
    • 1
  • U. Rajkumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Project Directorate on PoultryHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations