pp 1–9 | Cite as

Violet light is the most effective wavelength for recruiting the predatory bug Nesidiocoris tenuis

  • Takuya Uehara
  • Takumi Ogino
  • Akio Nakano
  • Toshiyuki Tezuka
  • Terumi Yamaguchi
  • Yooichi Kainoh
  • Masami ShimodaEmail author


Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) is a zoophytophagous mirid bug that is used as a biological control agent for agricultural pests including whiteflies. N. tenuis is mass-reared commercially and can be easily bred on banker plants. However, there are still difficulties in establishing populations on crops. Light illumination is a promising candidate for recruiting N. tenuis to crop plants. In this study, we investigated whether N. tenuis has a particular spectral preference using a six-arm arena equipped with six monochromatic LED lights: UV (365 nm), violet (405 nm), blue (450 nm), green (525 nm), orange (590 nm), and red (660 nm). Adult bugs were introduced into the arena, and phototactic behavior was observed. A greater number of male bugs chose violet light, whereas female bugs chose violet and UV light equally. We next examined the effects of violet illumination in a tomato greenhouse. In conventional plots, bugs remained near banker plants, whereas in illuminated plots, bugs immediately dispersed from the plants and became uniformly distributed in the greenhouse. Based on these results, we conclude that violet is a promising wavelength for the recruitment and establishment of N. tenuis on crop plants.


Phototaxis Behavioral manipulation IPM Optical manipulation Wavelength preference 



This work was supported by the Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “Technologies for creating next-generation agriculture, forestry and fisheries” (Funding agency: Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, NARO) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 25660268 and 16K14868 for MS.


  1. Abe J (2016) Insectary plants and indigenous natural enemies applicable for the conservation biological control. Mon J Agric Ext 53:19–21Google Scholar
  2. Arnó J, Castañé C, Riudavets J, Gabarra R (2010) Risk of damage to tomato crops by the generalist zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae). Bull Entomol Res 100:105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Yakir D, Antignus Y, Offir Y, Shahak Y (2013) Optical manipulations: an advance approach for reducing sucking insect pests. In: Ishaaya I, Palli SR, Horowitz AR (eds) Advanced technologies for managing insect pests. Springer, New York, pp 249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biondi A, Zappalà L, Di Mauro A, Garzia GT, Russo A, Desneux N, Siscaro G (2016) Can alternative host plant and prey affect phytophagy and biological control by the zoophytophagous mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis? BioControl 61:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Böckmann E, Meyhöfer R (2017) Sticky trap monitoring of a pest–predator system in glasshouse tomato crops: are available trap colours sufficient? J Appl Entomol 141:339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briscoe AD, Chittka L (2001) The evolution of color vision in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:471–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvo J, Bolckmans K, Stansly P, Urbaneja A (2009) Predation by Nesidiocoris tenuis on Bemisia tabaci and injury to tomato. BioControl 54:237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo FJ, Lorente MJ, Stansly PA, Belda JE (2012) Preplant release of Nesidiocoris tenuis and supplementary tactics for control of Tuta absoluta and Bemisa tabaci in greenhouse tomato. Entomol Exp Appl 143:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinomoto N, Nagasaka Y, Goto C, Ohara S, Tedzuka T (2015) Biological control of Thrips tabaci by omnivorous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis on cucumbers in greenhouses. Ann Rep Kanto-Tosan Pl Prot Soc 62:125–129Google Scholar
  10. Itou M, Watanabe M, Watanabe E, Miura K (2013) Gut content analysis to study predatory efficacy of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae) by molecular methods. Entomol Sci 16:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johansen NS, Vänninen I, Pinto DM, Nissinen AI, Shipp L (2011) In the light of new greenhouse technologies: 2. Direct effects of artificial lighting on arthropods and integrated pest management in greenhouse crops. Ann Appl Biol 159:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Komi K (2016) Biological control of pest insects in greenhouse use of natural enemy in Kochi Prefecture. Jpn J Pestic Sci 41:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maeda T, Fujiwara-Tsujii N, Yasui H, Matsuyama S (2016) Female sex pheromone in trails of the minute pirate bug, Orius minutus (L). J Chem Ecol 42:433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakano R, Tsuchida Y, Doi M, Ishikawa R, Tatara A, Amano Y, Muramatsu Y (2016) Control of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on tomato in greenhouse by a combination of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) and banker plants. Ann Rep Kansai Pl Prot 58:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nanya K, Ishigami Y, Hikosaka S, Goto E (2012) Effects of blue and red light on stem elongation and flowering of tomato seedlings. VII International Symposium on Light in Horticulture 956:261–266Google Scholar
  16. NARO (2015) Manual for micro-pest control by Nesidiocoris tenuis.
  17. Ogino T, Uehara T, Yamaguchi T, Maeda T, Yoshida NC, Shimoda M (2015) Spectral preference of the predatory bug Orius sauteri (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 59:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogino T, Uehara T, Muraji M, Yamaguchi T, Ichihashi T, Suzuki T, Kainoh Y, Shimoda M (2016) Violet LED light enhances the recruitment of a thrip predator in open fields. Sci Rep 6:32302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Otani Y, Wakakuwa M, Arikawa K (2014) Relationship between action spectrum and spectral sensitivity of compound eyes relating phototactic behavior of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 58:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Google Scholar
  21. Rim H, Uefune M, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J (2015) Olfactory response of the omnivorous mirid bug Nesidiocoris tenuis to eggplants infested by prey: specificity in prey developmental stages and prey species. Biol Control 91:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rim H, Uefune AM, Ozawa R, Yoneya K, Takabayashi J (2017) Experience of plant infestation by the omnivorous arthropod Nesidiocoris tenuis affects its subsequent responses to prey-infested plant volatiles. BioControl 62:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sánchez JA, Lacasa A (2008) Impact of the zoophytophagous plant bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) on tomato yield. J Econ Entomol 101:1864–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shimoda M, Honda K (2013) Insect reactions to light and its applications to pest management. Appl Entomol Zool 48:413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tokushima Y, Uehara T, Yamaguchi T, Arikawa K, Kainoh Y, Shimoda M (2016) Broadband photoreceptors are involved in violet light preference in the parasitoid fly Exorista Japonica. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160441. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Uehara T, Yamaguchi T, Kotaki T, Shimoda M (2014) Evaluation of phototactic behavior by two-dimensional open field test in the brown-winged green bug, Plautia stali (Scott) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 58:36–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Urbaneja A, Tapia G, Stansly P (2005) Influence of host plant and prey availability on developmental time and survivorship of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Het.: Miridae). Biocontrol Sci Techn 15:513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vacante V, Cocuzza GE, De Clercq P, Van De Veire M, Tirry L (1997) Development and survival of Orius albidipennis and O. levigatus (Het.: Anthocoridae) on various diets. Entomophaga 42:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vänninen I, Rönnqvist M, Dahlqvist M, Forsström J (2011) Nesidiocoris tenuis as an invasive pest in Finnish tomato crops: attempt to eradicate the bugs with nicotine-based programmes. IOBC/WPRS Bull 68:185–188Google Scholar
  30. Wakakuwa M, Stewart F, Matsumoto Y, Matsunaga S, Arikawa K (2014) Physiological basis of phototaxis to near-infrared light in Nephotettix cincticeps. J Comp Physiol A 200:527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warrant E, Nilsson DE (2006) Invertebrate vision. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Watanabe Y, Yasuda T, Yoneda T, Nakano A (2016) Examination of irradiation conditions using LED light for the growth of tomato seedlings. Bull Nat Inst Veg Tea Sci 15:57–66Google Scholar
  33. Wei D, Xian X, Zhou Z, Wang Z, Zhou X, Huang J (1998) Preliminary study on the functional responses of Cyrtopeltis tenuis to Spodoptera litura. Acta Agric Univ Henan 32:55–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Agrobiological SciencesNAROTsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceChiyoda, TokyoJapan
  4. 4.Tokushima Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries Technology Support CentreTokushimaJapan
  5. 5.Agri-Soken IncInashikiJapan

Personalised recommendations