Advertisement

BioControl

, Volume 63, Issue 6, pp 751–761 | Cite as

Factors influencing the dispersal of a native parasitoid, Phasgonophora sulcata, attacking the emerald ash borer: implications for biological control

  • Justin M. Gaudon
  • Jeremy D. Allison
  • Sandy M. Smith
Article

Abstract

High parasitism by a native parasitoid, Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), has been reported on emerald ash borer (hereafter EAB), Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in North America. Use of this parasitoid in an augmentative biological control program has been proposed to slow the spread of EAB, yet information is lacking on key aspects of this parasitoid’s dispersal. We document the flight capacity and walking activity of P. sulcata, its potential fecundity, and describe how age, body size, temperature, and time of day affect these parameters. Wasp flight capacity, measured using flight mills, increased with temperature and decreased with age. Unexpectedly, age and body size did not affect wasp walking activity, and we saw no relationship between walking activity and flight capacity. Older wasps had lower potential fecundity than younger wasps. These results suggest that P. sulcata should be released as pupae near EAB-infested ash trees to improve efficacy and potential biological control success.

Keywords

Agrilus planipennis Flight capacity Flight mills Walking activity Wasp age Fecundity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank C. MacQuarrie and G. Jones for help with collection and rearing, R. Nott for constructing and connecting the flight mills to LabVIEW Full Development System software, and J. Hu for help with dissections. This work was funded by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship, University of Toronto Fellowship, and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and Invasive Species Centre.

Author contributions

JMG, JDA, and SMS conceived and designed the experiment; JMG conducted the experiment and analyzed the data; and all authors contributed to writing the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anulewicz A, McCullough DG, Cappaert DL, Poland TM (2008) Host range of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in North America: results of multiple-choice field experiments. Environ Entomol 37:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barter GW (1957) Studies of the bronze birch borer, Agrilus anxius Gory, in New Brunswick. Can Entomol 89:12–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barter GW (1965) Survival and development of the bronze poplar borer Agrilus liragus Barter & Brown (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Can Entomol 97:1063–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beenakkers AMT, Vanderhorst DJ, Vanmarrewijk WJ (1984) Insect flight muscle metabolism. Insect Biochem 14:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boggs CL (1986) Reproductive strategies of female butter flies: variation in and constraints on fecundity. Environ Entomol 11:7–15Google Scholar
  6. Bruzzone OA, Villacide JM, Bernstein C, Corley JC (2009) Flight variability in the woodwasp Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae): an analysis of flight data using wavelets. J Exp Biol 212:731–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cipollini D (2015) White fringetree as a novel larval host for emerald ash borer. J Econ Entomol 108:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cipollini D, Rigsby CM, Peterson DL (2017) Feeding and development of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on cultivated olive, Olea europaea. J Econ Entomol 110:1935–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Czerwinski EJ, Tucker L, Evans HJ, Biggs WD, Rowlinson DT (2007) Invasive species in Ontario’s forest. In: Scarr T, Hopkin A, Pollard J (eds) Forest health conditions in Ontario, 2006. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, pp 23–41Google Scholar
  10. Dingle H (1965) The relation between age and flight activity in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus. J Exp Biol 42:269–283Google Scholar
  11. Fahrner SJ, Lelito JP, Blaedow K, Heimpel GE, Aukema BH (2014) Factors affecting the flight capacity of Tetrastichus planipennisi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a classical biological control agent of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environ Entomol 43:1603–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forsse E, Smith SM, Bourchier RS (1992) Flight initiation in the egg parasitoid Trichogramma minutum: effects of ambient temperature, mates, food, and host eggs. Entomol Exp Appl 62:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaudon JM, Haavik LJ, MacQuarrie CJK, Smith SM, Allison JD (2016) Influence of nematode parasitism, body size, temperature, and diel periodicity on the flight capacity of Sirex noctilio F. (Hymenoptera: Siricidae). J Insect Behav 29:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haack RA, Benjamin DM, Schuh BA (1981) Observations on the biology of Phasgonophora sulcata (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), a larval parasitoid of the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in Wisconsin. Great Lakes Entomol 14:42–45Google Scholar
  15. Haack RA, Jendek E, Liu H, Marchant KR, Petrice TR, Poland TM, Ye H (2002) The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsl Mich Entomol Soc 47:1–5Google Scholar
  16. Haavik LJ, Allison JD, MacQuarrie CJK, Nott RW, Ryan K, de Groot P, Turgeon JJ (2016) Non-lethal effects of nematode infection on Sirex noctilio and Sirex nigricornis (Hymenoptera: Siricidae). Environ Entomol 45:320–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison XA (2015) A comparison of observation-level random effect and Beta-Binomial models for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data in ecology & evolution. PeerJ 3:e1114.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heimpel GE, Asplen MK (2011) A ‘Goldilocks’ hypothesis for dispersal of biological control agents. BioControl 56:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herms DA, McCullough DG (2014) Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 59:13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopper KR, Roush RT (1993) Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecol Entomol 18:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Innocent TM, Abe J, West SA, Reece SE (2010) Competition between relatives and the evolution of dispersal in a parasitoid wasp. J Evol Biol 23:1374–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jervis MA, Heimpel GE, Ferns PN, Harvey JA, Kidd NAC (2001) Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps: a comparative analysis of ‘ovigeny’. J Anim Ecol 70:442–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson MD (1990) Female size and fecundity in the small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata (Robertson) (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). J Kansas Entomol Soc 63:414–419Google Scholar
  24. Jones VP, Smith TJ, Naranjo S (2010) Insect ecology and behavior: laboratory flight mill studies. http://entomology.tfrec.wsu.edu/VPJ_Lab/Flight-Mill.html. Accessed 11 July 2015
  25. Leather SR (1988) Reproductive potential and fecundity in insects: things aren’t as simple as they seem. Oikos 51:386–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyons DB (2010) Biological control of emerald ash borer. In: Lyons DB, Scarr TA (eds) Guiding principles for managing the emerald ash borer in urban environments. Natural Resources Canada and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Burlington, pp 29–34Google Scholar
  27. Matthews RW, González JM, Matthews JR, Deyrup LD (2009) Biology of the parasitoid Melittobia (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Annu Rev Entomol 54:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenney DW, Pedlar JH, Yemshanov D, Lyons DB, Campbell KL, Lawrence K (2012) Estimates of the potential cost of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) in Canadian municipalities. Arbor Urban For 38:81–91Google Scholar
  29. Mills NJ, Heimpel GE (2018) Could increased understanding of foraging behavior help to predict the success of biological control? Curr Opin Insect Sci 27:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perez-Mendoza J, Campbell JF, Throne JE (2011) Influence of age, mating status, sex, quantity of food, and long-term food deprivation on red flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) flight initiation. J Econ Entomol 104:2078–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ratte HT (1985) Temperature and insect development. In: Hoffman KH (ed) Environmental physiology and biochemistry of insects. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–66Google Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org
  33. Roscoe LE (2014) Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae): a potential augmentative biological control agent for the invasive Agrilus planipennis (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Canada. University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  34. Roscoe LE, Lyons DB, Smith SM (2016) Observations on the life-history traits of the North American parasitoid Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) attacking Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Ontario, Canada. Can Entomol 148:294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenheim JA, Rosen D (1991) Foraging and oviposition decisions in the parasitoid Aphytis lingnanensis: distinguishing the influences of egg load and experience. J Anim Ecol 60:873–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rowley WA, Graham CL (1968) The effect of age on the flight performance of female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol 14:719–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salt G (1941) The effects of hosts upon their insect parasites. Biol Rev 16:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shea K, Possingham HP (2000) Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management. J Appl Ecol 37:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suverkropp BP, Bigler F, van Lenteren JC (2001) Temperature influences walking speed and walking activity of Trichogramma brassicae (Hym., Trichogrammatidae). J Appl Entomol 125:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor LR (1963) Analysis of the effect of temperature on insects in flight. J Anim Ecol 32:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Venkateswaran V, Shrivastava A, Kumble ALK, Borges RM (2017) Life-history strategy, resource dispersion and phylogenetic associations shape dispersal of a fig wasp community. Movement Ecol 5:25.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-017-0117-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waage JK, Ng SM (1984) The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp. I. Optimal progeny allocation in Trichogramma evanescens. J Anim Ecol 53:401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wäckers FL (2005) Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen and honeydew as insect food sources. In: Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (eds) Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wanner H, Gu H, Dorn S (2006) Nutritional value of floral nectar sources for flight in the parasitoid wasp, Cotesia glomerata. Physiol Entomol 31:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiman NG, Walton VM, Shearer PW, Rondon SI, Lee JC (2014) Factors affecting flight capacity of brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J Pest Sci 88:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yu H, Zhang Y, Wu K, Wyckhuys KAG, Guo Y (2009) Flight potential of Microplitis mediator, a parasitoid of various lepidopteran pests. BioControl 54:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources Canada-Canadian Forest ServiceGreat Lakes Forestry CentreSault Ste. MarieCanada

Personalised recommendations