, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 91–101 | Cite as

Folivory impact of the biocontrol beetle, Cassida rubiginosa, on population growth of Cirsium arvense

  • Michael G. CrippsEmail author
  • Sarah D. Jackman
  • Chikako van Koten


The folivorous beetle, Cassida rubiginosa Müller (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), was released in New Zealand in 2007 as a biocontrol agent against the pasture weed, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. The impact of the beetle on shoot population density and spread was assessed over two years on isolated experimental plots within an established population of the weed. Four folivory treatments were imposed by applying 0, 5, 10 or 20 larvae per shoot. Folivory in the 10 and 20 larvae per shoot treatments caused C. arvense population declines of 29% and 75%, respectively, although this effect was not consistent between the two years. Shoot spread was reduced in both years where 10 or 20 larvae per shoot were applied. This study represents the first post-release assessment of this biocontrol agent in New Zealand, and indicates that average densities of ≥ ten larvae per shoot can reduce population density and spread of C. arvense.


Cassida rubiginosa Cirsium arvense Cardueae Herbivory Thistle 



This research was funded by Beef + Lamb NZ and the Ministry for Primary Industries, through the Sustainable Farming Fund (Project 401499). Additional support was provided by the AgResearch Strategic Science Investment Fund for Pasture Weed Ecology. We thank Tom Maxwell (Sheep & Beef farmer, Scargill, Canterbury), for allowing the field trial to be carried out on his property, and hosting a field day on thistle biocontrol.


  1. Ang BN, Kok LT, Holtzman GI, Wolf DD (1995) Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.) response to density of Cassida rubiginosa Müller (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and plant competition. Biol Control 5(1):31–38Google Scholar
  2. Asadi G, Ghorbani R, Karimi J, Bagheri A, Mueller-Schaerer H (2013) Host impact and specificity of tortoise beetle (Cassida rubiginosa) on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Iran. Weed Technol 27(2):405–411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacher S, Schwab F (2000) Effect of herbivore density, timing of attack and plant community on performance of creeping thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (Asteraceae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 10:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg SH, Hough-Goldstein J, Lake EC, D’Amico V (2015) Mile-a-minute weed (Persicaria perfoliata) and weevil (Rhinoncomimus latipes) response to varying moisture and temperature conditions. Biol Control 83:68–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdôt GW, Leathwick DM, Hurrell GA, Saville DJ (1998) Relationship between aerial shoot and root biomass in Californian thistle. Proc N Z Plant Prot Soc 51:28–32Google Scholar
  6. Bourdôt GW, Hurrell GA, Saville DJ (2014) Frequency of occurrence and ground cover of Cirsium arvense on pastoral farms in New Zealand: a farmer opinion survey. N Z J Agric Res 57(1):1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdôt GW, Basse B, Cripps MG (2016a) Mowing strategies for controlling Cirsium arvense in a permanent pasture in New Zealand compared using a matrix model. Ecol Evolut 6(9):2968–2977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdôt GW, Hurrell GA, Trolove M, Saville DJ (2016b) Seasonal dynamics of ground cover in Cirsium arvense—a basis for estimating grazing losses and economic impacts. Weed Res 56(2):179–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cartwright B, Kok LT (1990) Feeding by Cassida rubiginosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the effects of defoliation on growth of musk thistles. J Entomol Sci 25(4):538–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clewley GD, Eschen R, Shaw RH, Wright DJ (2012) The effectiveness of classical biological control of invasive plants. J Appl Ecol 49(6):1287–1295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox CS, McEvoy PB (1983) Effect of summer moisture stress on the capacity of tansy ragwort (Senecio jacobaea) to compensate for defoliation by cinnabar moth (Tyria jacobaeae). J Appl Ecol 20(1):225–234. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cripps MG (2013) Observations on the thistle-feeding tortoise beetle, Cassida rubiginosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Weta 45:5–13Google Scholar
  13. Cripps MG, Edwards GR, Bourdot GW, Saville DJ, Hinz HL, Fowler SV (2010) Effects of pasture competition and specialist herbivory on the performance of Cirsium arvense. Biocontrol Sci Technol 20:641–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cripps MG, Bourdôt GW, Saville DJ, Hinz HL, Fowler SV, Edwards GR (2011a) Influence of insects and fungal pathogens on individual and population parameters of Cirsium arvense in its native and introduced ranges. Biol Invasions 13(12):2739–2754. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cripps MG, Gassmann A, Fowler SV, Bourdôt GW, McClay AS, Edwards GR (2011b) Classical biological control of Cirsium arvense: Lessons from the past. Biol Control 57(3):165–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis S, Mangold J, Menalled F, Orloff N, Miller Z, Lehnhoff E (2018) A meta-analysis of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) management. Weed Sci 1–10.
  17. De Bruijn SL, Bork EW, Grekul CW (2010) Neighbor defoliation regulates Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in pasture by mediating interspecific competition. Crop Prot 29(12):1489–1495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dhileepan K, Setter SD, McFadyen RE (2000) Response of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae) to defoliation by the introduced biocontrol agent Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biol Control 19(1):9–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Donald WW (1993) Root versus shoot measurements to evaluate recovery of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) after several years of control treatments. Can J Plant Sci 73(1):369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards GR, Bourdôt GW, Crawley MJ (2000) Influence of herbivory, competition and soil fertility on the abundance of Cirsium arvense in acid grassland. J Appl Ecol 37:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kosior A (1975) Biology, ecology, and economic importance of Cassids (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) of the Ojcow National Park. Acta Zool Crac 20(9):251–392Google Scholar
  22. Paynter Q, Fowler SV, Groenteman R (2018) Making weed biological control predictable, safer and more effective: perspectives from New Zealand. BioControl 63(3):427–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schat M, Blossey B (2005) Influence of natural and simulated leaf beetle herbivory on biomass allocation and plant architecture of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Environ Entomol 34(4):906–914. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schenk D, Bacher S (2002) Functional response of a generalist insect predator to one of its prey species in the field. J Anim Ecol 71(3):524–531. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stastny M, Sargent RD (2017) Evidence for rapid evolutionary change in an invasive plant in response to biological control. J Evol Biol 30(5):1042–1052. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tiley GED (2010) Biological flora of the British isles: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. J Ecol 98(4):938–983. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tipping PW (1993) Field studies with Cassida rubiginosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Canada thistle. Environ Entomol 22(6):1402–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ward RH, Pienkowski RL (1978a) Biology of Cassida rubiginosa, a thistle-feeding shield beetle. Ann Entomol Soc Am 71(4):585–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward RH, Pienkowski RL (1978b) Mortality and parasitism of Cassida rubiginosa, a thistle-feeding shield beetle accidentally introduced into North America. Environ Entomol 7:536–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Webb CJ, Sykes WR, Garnock-Jones PJ (1988) Flora of New Zealand, vol 4, naturalised pteridophytes, gymnosperms, dicotyledons. DSIR, Botany Division, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael G. Cripps
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarah D. Jackman
    • 1
  • Chikako van Koten
    • 1
  1. 1.AgResearch, Lincoln Research CentreLincolnNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations