, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 79–87 | Cite as

Evaluation of seven plant species/cultivars for their suitability as banker plants for Orius insidiosus (Say)

  • M. O. WaiteEmail author
  • C. D. Scott-Dupree
  • M. Brownbridge
  • R. Buitenhuis
  • G. Murphy


Marigold (cv. Lemon Gem), castor bean, ornamental pepper (cv. Black Pearl and Purple Flash), gerbera daisy (cv. Festival), feverfew, and sunflower (cv. Choco Sun) were evaluated for their suitability as banker plants (BP) for Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in commercial greenhouses. Oviposition, egg hatch, nymphal development to adulthood, and population increase were quantified in laboratory trials. Assessments of oviposition and egg hatch indicated that all plants tested were equally accepted by O. insidiosus. Nymphal development to adulthood and survival tests indicated that gerbera may be a suitable BP as survival was the highest (58.1 %), whereas marigold would not be an acceptable BP as only 10.7 % of nymphs survived to adulthood. Nymphal development time differed by only one day among all plants. In greenhouse cage experiments, Purple Flash pepper supported the greatest population growth over a ten week period. Based on the combined results from all tests, Purple Flash pepper appears to have the greatest potential as a BP species for O. insidiosus.


Orius insidiosus Hemiptera Anthocoridae Frankliniella occidentalis Banker plant Biological control 



This work was conducted at the Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, a not for profit organization dedicated to horticultural science and innovation, located in Canada’s Niagara Region. We thank Biobest Canada Ltd. for supply of O. insidiosus, Angela Brommit, Rebecca Eerkes, Erik Glemser, and Andrew McFarlane for technical support. This research was funded through the OMAFRA-University of Guelph Research Program and a MITACS grant sponsored by Eco Habitat Agri-Services to M.O.W.


  1. Almer CA, Wiedenmann RN, Bush DR (1998) Plant feeding site selection on soybean by the facultatively phytophagous predator Orius insidiosus. Entomol Exp Appl 86:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baggen LR, Gurr GM, Meats A (1999) Flowers in tri-trophic systems: mechanisms allowing selective exploitation by insect natural enemies for conservation biological control. Entomol Exp Appl 91:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosco L, Giacometto E, Tavella L (2008) Colonization and predation of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) by Orius spp. (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in sweet pepper greenhouses in northwest Italy. Biol Control 44:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brødsgaard HF (2004) Biological control of thrips in ornamental crops. In: Heinz KM, van Driesche R, Parrella MP (eds) Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Batavia, USA, pp 253–264Google Scholar
  5. Buergi L (2007) Marigolds: an alternative food source for Orius insidiosus? effects of marigold pollen and other selected pollen species on reproduction of Orius insidiosus and its implications for marigold banker plants. Master of Science thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers RJ, Long S, Helyer NL (1993) Effectiveness of Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) for the control of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber and pepper in the UK. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coll M (1996) Feeding and ovipositing on plants by an omnivorous insect predator. Oecologia 105:214–220Google Scholar
  8. Daughtrey ML, Jones RK, Moyer JW, Daub ME, Baker JR (1997) Tospoviruses strike the greenhouse industry: INSV has become a major pathogen on flower crops. Plant Dis 81:1220–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deligeorgidis PN (2002) Predatory effect of Orius niger (Wolff) (Hemiptera: anthocoridae) on Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J Appl Entomol 126:82–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fauvel G (1974) Sur l’alimentation pollinique d’un anthocoride prédateur, Orius vicinus Rib. (Hemiptere). Ann Zool Ecol Anim 6:245–258Google Scholar
  11. Frank SD (2010) Biological control of arthropod pests using banker plant systems: past progress and future directions. Biol Control 52:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. German TL, Ullman DE, Moyer JW (1992) Tospoviruses: diagnosis, molecular biology, phylogeny, and vector relationships. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:315–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang N, Enkegaard A, Osborne LS, Ramakers PMJ, Messelink G, Pijnakker J, Murphy G (2011) The banker plant method in biological control. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lundgren JG (2011) Reproductive ecology of predaceous heteroptera. Biol Control 59:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lundgren JG, Fergen JK (2006) The oviposition behavior of the predator Orius insidiosus: acceptability and preference for different plants. BioControl 51(2):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Osborne LS, Bolckmans K, Landa Z, Pena J (2004) Kinds of natural enemies. In: Heinz KM, van Driesche RG, Parrella MP (eds) Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Batavia, USA, pp 95–127Google Scholar
  17. Richards PC, Schmidt JM (1996) The suitability of some natural and artificial substrates as oviposition sites for the insidious flower bug, Orius insidiosus. Entomol Exp Appl 80:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schuel RW (1992) The production of nectar and pollen. In: Graham JM (ed) The hive and the honey bee. Dadant & Sons, Hamilton IL, USA, pp 401–436Google Scholar
  19. Seagraves MP, Lundgren JG (2010) Oviposition response by Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to plant quality and prey availability. Biol Control 55:174–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silveira CP, Filho EB, Pierre LSR, Peres FSC, Louzada JNC (2009) Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.) as an attractive crop to natural enemies in onion fields. Sci Agric 66(6):780–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Slater JA (2005) Order hemiptera: true bugs, cicadas, hoppers, psyllids, whiteflies, aphids, and scale insects. In: Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (eds) Borror and Delong’s introduction to the study of insects, 7th edn. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, USA, pp 268–332Google Scholar
  22. Tommasini MG, Maini S (1995) Frankliniella occidentalis and other thrips harmful to vegetable and ornamental crops in Europe. In: Loomans AJM, van Lenteren JC, Tommasini MG, Maini S, Riudavets J (eds) Biological control of thrips pests. Veenmen Drukkers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  23. Van den Meiracker RAF, Ramakers PMJ (1991) Biological control of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, in sweet pepper, with the anthocorid predator, Orius insidiosus. Med Fac Landbouww Rijksuniv Gent 56:241–249Google Scholar
  24. Van Lenteren JC, Loomans AJM (1999) Biological control of thrips: how far are we? IOBC/WPRS Bull 22:141–144Google Scholar
  25. Wong S, Frank S (2012) Influence of banker plants and spiders on biological control by Orius insidiosus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Biol Control 63:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong SK, Frank SD (2013) Pollen increases fitness and abundance of Orius insidiosus Say (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on banker plants. Biol Control 64:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. O. Waite
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. D. Scott-Dupree
    • 2
  • M. Brownbridge
    • 3
  • R. Buitenhuis
    • 3
  • G. Murphy
    • 4
  1. 1.Monsanto Canada Inc.GuelphCanada
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  3. 3.Horticultural Production SystemsVineland Research and Innovation CentreVinelandCanada
  4. 4.Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsVinelandCanada

Personalised recommendations