, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 619–626 | Cite as

Assessing the non-target impacts of classical biological control agents: is host-testing always necessary?

  • John G. Charles


Release of a biocontrol agent in New Zealand is typically preceded by non-target testing of native or valued species. Nevertheless, if both the target pest and the natural enemy are very different from any native fauna, then there may be no scientific justification for host testing. Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) is being considered as a biocontrol agent for glassy winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), should the pest arrive. An assessment of the potential impact of G. ashmeadi on New Zealand’s Cicadellidae and Membracidae, from published literature data, indicates that none of these insects is at risk, as their eggs will not be recognised by the parasitoid because either their size or location places them outside the parasitoid’s search pattern. Consequently, there is no scientific case for any non-target host-testing to be carried out in containment.


Glassy winged sharpshooter Homalodisca vitripennis Gonatocerus ashmeadi Hemiptera Cicadellidae Membracidae Hymenoptera Mymaridae Oviposition ecology Host range testing New Zealand 



This paper is based upon a report to New Zealand’s Sustainable Farming Fund. New Zealand Winegrowers and New Zealand Citrus Growers Inc. supported this research, which was finalised with funding from New Zealand’s ‘Science Solutions for Better Border Biosecurity (B3) programme’ Fig. 1 was provided by David Logan, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited.


  1. Berndt LA, Withers TM, Mansfield S, Hoare RJB (2009) Non-target species selection for host range testing of Cotesia urabae. N Z Plant Prot 62:168–173Google Scholar
  2. Boyd EA, Hoddle MS (2007) Host specificity testing of Gonatocerus spp. egg-parasitoids used in a classical biological control program against Homalodisca vitripennis: a retrospective analysis for non-target impacts in Southern California. Biol Control 43:56–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charles JG, Dugdale JS (2011) Non-target species selection for host-range testing of Mastrus ridens. N Z Entomol 34:45–51Google Scholar
  4. Claridge MF, Reynolds WJ (1972) Host plant specificity, oviposition behaviour and egg parasitism in some woodland leafhoppers of the genus Oncopsis (Hemiptera Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Trans Royal Entomol Soc Lond 124:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claridge MF, Wilson MR (1976) Diversity and distribution patterns of some mesophyll-feeding leafhoppers of temperate woodland canopy. Ecol Entomol 1:231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dietrich CH, McKamey SH (1990) Three new idiocerine leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from Guyana with notes on ant-mutualism and subsociality. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 92:214–223Google Scholar
  7. Dietrich CH, Rakitov RA, Holmes JL, Black WC IV (2001) Phylogeny of the major lineages of Membracoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha) based on 28S rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 18(2):293–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fletcher MJ (2009) Identification keys and checklists for the leafhoppers, planthoppers and their relatives occurring in Australia and neighbouring areas (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). Accessed 27 Feb 2012
  9. Grandgirard J, Hoddle MS, Petit JN, Percy DM, Roderick GK, Davies N (2007) Pre-introductory risk assessment studies of Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) for use as a classical biological control agent against Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in the Society Islands of French Polynesia. BioControl Sci Techn 17:809–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grandgirard J, Hoddle MS, Petit JN, Roderick GK, Davies N (2008) Engineering an invasion: classical biological control of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis, by the egg parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi in Tahiti and Moorea, French Polynesia. Biol Invasions 10:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Irvin NA, Hoddle MS (2006) The effect of intraspecific competition on progeny sex ratio in Gonatocerus spp. for Homalodisca coagulata egg masses: Economic implications for mass rearing and biological control. Biol Control 39:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight WJ (1974) Leafhoppers of New Zealand: subfamilies Aphrodinae, Jassinae, Xestocephalinae, Idiocerinae, and Macropsinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) N Z. J Zool 1:475–493Google Scholar
  13. Knight WJ (1987) Leafhoppers of the grass-feeding genus Balclutha (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) in the Pacific region. J Nat Hist 21:1173–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuhlmann U, Schaffner U, Mason PG (2006) Selection of non-target species for host specificity testing. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods: methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, UK, pp 15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larivière M-C, Fletcher MJ, Larochelle A (2010) Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera): catalogue. Fauna of New Zealand, vol 63. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand, p 232Google Scholar
  16. Matthews MJ (1986) The British species of Gonatocerus Nees (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), egg parasitoids of Homoptera. Syst Entomol 11:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Noyes JS (2011) Universal Chalcidoidea Database. World Wide Web electronic publication. Accessed 27 Feb 2012
  18. Noyes JS, Valentine EW (1989) Mymaridae (Insecta:Hymenoptera): introduction and review of genera. Fauna of New Zealand, vol 17. DSIR Publishing, Wellington, New Zealand, p 95Google Scholar
  19. Petit JN, Hoddle MS, Grandgirard J, Roderick GK, Davies N (2008) Short-distance dispersal behaviour and establishment of the parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in Tahiti: implications for its use as a biological control agent against Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Biol Control 45:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rakitov RA (2004) Powdering of egg nests with brochosomes and related sexual dimorphism in leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Zool J Linn Soc 140:353–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Turner WF, Pollard HN (1959) Life-histories and behavior of five insect vectors of phony peach disease. U S Dep Agric Technic Bull, USA 1188:1–32Google Scholar
  22. van Driesche RG, Reardon R (2004) Assessing host ranges for parasitoids and predators used for classical biological control: a guide to best practice. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Morgantown, USA Google Scholar
  23. van Lenteren JC, Cock MJW, Hoffmeister TS, Sands DPA (2006) Host specificity in arthropod biological control, methods for testing and interpretation of the data. In: Bigler F, Babendreier D, Kuhlmann U (eds) Environmental impact of invertebrates for biological control of arthropods. Methods and risk assessment. CABI Publishing, UK, pp 38–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vickerman DB, Hoddle MS, Triapitsyn S, Stouthamer R (2004) Species identity of geographically distinct populations of the glassy-winged sharpshooter parasitoid Gonatocerus ashmeadi: morphology, DNA sequences, and reproductive compatibility. Biol Control 31:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wells JM, Raju BC, Hung HY, Weisburg WG, Mandelco-Paul L, Brenner DJ (1987) Xylella fastidiosa gen. nov., sp. nov.: gram-negative, xylem-limited, fastidious plant bacteria related to Xanthomonas spp. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zahniser JN, Dietrich CH (2010) Phylogeny of the leafhopper subfamily Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) based on molecular and morphological data with a revised family-group classification. Syst Entomol 35:489–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research LimitedAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations