BioControl

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 259–275 | Cite as

Bipolaris euphorbiae as a Biological Control Agent for Wild Poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla): Host-Specificity and Variability in Pathogen and Host Populations

  • Kátia Lima De Nechet
  • Robert Weingart Barreto
  • Eduardo S. G. Mizubuti
Article

Abstract

Bipolaris euphorbiae (anamorphic Ascomycota: Pleosporaceae) has been studied since the early 1980s as a potential biocontrol agent of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla), a noxious invader of soybean fields in Brazil. A new isolate (KLN05) was arbitrarily selected after the aggressiveness of six isolates of the fungus obtained from different sites was evaluated on wild poinsettias grown from seeds obtained from six different geographic origins in Brazil: Viçosa-state of Minas Gerais; Itabuna-state of Bahia; Niterói-state of Rio de Janeiro; Nova Laranjeira, Londrina and Foz do Iguaçú-state of Paraná. Bipolaris euphorbiae grew between 10 and 30 °C, with the optimum for colony growth at 25 °C. The best temperature range for conidial germination was between 20 and 30 °C. Conidial germination was not inhibited by mixing conidia with imazethapyr (106 g of active ingredient [a.i.]/l), glyphosate (720 g of a.i./kg), fomesafen (250 g of a.i./l), carfentrazone (400 g of a.i./l), atrazine (500 g of a.i./l) and glyphosate+carfentrazone (720 g of a.i/kg+400 g of a.i/l). Bipolaris euphorbiae was inoculated on plants belonging to 32 species of 12 different plant families and was only capable of infecting E. heterophylla.

Keywords

Biological Control Atrazine Glyphosate Geographic Origin Biocontrol Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auld, B.A. 1997BioherbicidesJulien, M.White, G. eds. Biological Control of Weeds: Theory and Practical ApplicationACIAR Monograph no. 49Australia129134Google Scholar
  2. Barreto, R.W., Evans, H.C. 1998Fungal pathogens of Euphorbia heterphylla and E. hirta in Brazil and their potential as weed biocontrol agentsMycopathologia1412136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, C.L., Madden, L.V. 1990Introduction to Plant Disease EpidemiologyJohn Wiley & SonsNew York532Google Scholar
  4. Charudattan, R. 1990The mycoherbicide approach with plant pathogensTeBeest, D.O. eds. Microbial Control of WeedsChapman and HallNew York2457Google Scholar
  5. Dhingra, O.D., Sinclair, J.B. 1995Basic Plant Pathology MethodsCRC PressNew York434Google Scholar
  6. Foloni, L.L. and Christoffoleti, P.J. 1999. Chemical weed control in soybean in Brazil using new herbicides and mixtures. In: The British Crop Protection Council (ed), Proceedings of the 1999 Brighton Conference Weeds, 1999, Brighton British Crop Protection Council, Brighton, UK. pp. 315–318.Google Scholar
  7. Gazziero, D.L.P., Yorinori, J.T. 1993Experiência sobre controle biológico de Euphorbia heterophylla no BrasilFCAVJaboticabalGoogle Scholar
  8. Gomes, S.M., Dianese, J.C. 1987Efeito de Helminthosporium sp. sobre estágios de desenvolvimento do leiteiro (Euphorbia heterophylla L.)Fitopatol. Bras.12138Google Scholar
  9. Hoagland, R.E. 1996Chemical interactions with bioherbicides to improve efficacyWeed Technol.10651674Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, M.A., Schisler, D.A., Slininger, P.J., Boyette, C.D., Silman, R.W., Bothast, R.J. 1996Fermentation strategies for improving the fitness of a bioherbicideWeed Technol.10645650Google Scholar
  11. Kissmann, K.G., Groth, D. 1992Plantas infestantes e nocivas. Tomo IIBasf BrasileiraSão PauloGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorenzi, H.J. 2000Plantas Daninhas do Brasil: terrestres, aquáticas, parasitas, tóxicas e medicinaisNova OdessaSão Paulo608Google Scholar
  13. Marchiori, R., Nachtigal, G.F., Coelho, L., Yorinori, J.T., Pitelli, R.A. 2001Comparison of culture media for the mass production of Bipolaris euphorbiae and its impact on Euphorbia heterophylla dry matter accumulationSumma Phytopathol.27428432Google Scholar
  14. Melhorança, A.L., Pereira, F.A.R. 1999Eficiência do herbicida lactofen no controle de Euphorbia heterophylla, resistente aos herbicidas inibidores da enzima acetolactato sintase (ALS)Documentos-Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste31114Google Scholar
  15. Muchovej, J.J., Carvalho, A.O. 1989A new combination for Helminthosporium euphorbiae Mycotaxon35159162Google Scholar
  16. Pereira, J.M., Barreto, R.W., Ellison, C.A., Maffia, L.A. 2003 Corynespora cassiicola f. sp. lantanae: a potential biocontrol agent for Lantana camara from BrazilBiol. Control262131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prates, L.G., Fernandes, J.M.C. 2000Efeito da temperatura no crescimento micelial de Bipolaris sorokiniana Fitopatol. Bras.25661663Google Scholar
  18. Tebeest, D.O., Yang, X.B., Cisar, C.R. 1992The status of biological control of weeds with fungal pathogensAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.30637657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Timossi, A.J. 2002I Levantamento de safra 2002/2003 FNP Consultoria & Comércio: Grãos (milho e soja)FNP AgroinformativosBrasil1Google Scholar
  20. Vidal, R.A. and N.G. Fleck, 1997. Three weed species with confirmed resistance to herbicides in Brazil. In: Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America, WSSA Abstracts. pp.100.Google Scholar
  21. Walker, L. 1980Production of spores for field studiesAdv. Agric. Technol.1215Google Scholar
  22. Wapshere, A.J. 1974A strategy for evaluating the safety of organisms for biological weed controlAnn. App. Biol.77201211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weidemann, G.J., TeBeest, D.O. 1990Biology of host range testing for biocontrol of weedsWeed Techn.4465470Google Scholar
  24. Yorinori, J.T. 1985Biological control of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) with pathogenic fungiDelfosse, E.S. eds. Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, 1985Vancouver Agriculture CanadaVancouver, Canada677681Google Scholar
  25. Yorinori, J.T. 1987Controle biológico de ervas daninhas com microrganismosFundação, Cargill eds. Anais da II Reunião sobre Controle Biológico de Doenças de Plantas, 1987Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luis de Queiroz”Piracicaba, São Paulo2030Google Scholar
  26. Yorinori, J.T., Gazziero, D.L.P 1989Control of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) with Helminthosporium spDelfosse, E.S. eds. Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, 1989Rome Istituto Sperimentale per la Patologia VegetaleRome, Italy571576Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kátia Lima De Nechet
    • 1
  • Robert Weingart Barreto
    • 1
  • Eduardo S. G. Mizubuti
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de FitopatologiaUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil

Personalised recommendations