Reproduction and mortality rates in ecologically distinct species of murid rodents

  • Eugene NovikovEmail author
  • Ekaterina Kondratuk
  • Tatiana Titova
  • Pavel Zadubrovsky
  • Inna Zadubrovskaya
  • Mikhail Potapov
  • Olga Potapova
  • Ludmila Proskurnyak
  • Galina Nazarova
Research Article


The trade-off between reproduction and somatic maintenance is one of the most studied concepts of modern evolutionary ecology. This theory predicts a negative relationship between maximum species longevity and total reproductive output. However, studies performed on natural animal populations have found contradictory results, probably due to the unlikelihood of wild animals gaining both maximum longevity and maximum potential fecundity. A comparison of the mortality rates and reproductive output of four ecologically distinct rodent species of Cricetidae family that were maintained in the laboratory in controlled conditions revealed the different life-history tactics of subterranean social mole voles and three related aboveground species: hydrophilic water voles, arid dwarf hamsters and steppe lemmings. Regardless of the relatively higher mortality rates at early ages in mole voles, this species has considerably higher maximum species longevity and smaller litter sizes that do not depend on calendar age, whereas in dwarf hamsters and water voles clear negative correlations between female age and litter size were detected. Steppe lemmings, as a semi-social arid species, shared some life-history tactics with both mole voles and aboveground non-social rodents.


Longevity Survival Reproduction Murid rodents Captivity 



The study was supported by the Federal Program of Fundamental Scientific Studies 2013–2020 (VI.51.1.8) AAAA-A16-116121410118-7 and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grants 13-04-01045 and 16-04-00888.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Keeping conditions were adjusted to the biology of each species to minimise the harmful and stressful effects of caging. Climatic regimes in laboratory rooms were comfortable for the animals; conventional diet was balanced and included all the nutrients essential for the normal grows and development. The rooms were periodically sterilised by quartz lamp. We did not disturb the animals without the reason. If deceased, individuals were carefully removed from the cages. All manipulations with the animals were performed with care and according to local and national legal requirements. The Experimental protocol conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.


  1. Anisimov VN, Egorov MV, Krasilshchikova MS et al (2011) Effects of the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant SkQ1 on lifespan of rodents. Aging 3:1110–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashenina NV (1975) Guidelines for the maintenance and breeding of new in the laboratory practice species of small rodents. Moscow University Press, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  3. Bashenina NV (1977) Adaptation pathways in murine rodents. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  4. Buffenstein R (2005) The naked mole-rat: a new long-living model for human aging research. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:1369–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buffenstein R (2008) Negligible senescence in the longest living rodent, the naked mole-rat: insights from a successfully aging species. J Comp Physiol B 178:439–445. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cichoń M, Kozłowski J (2000) Ageing and typical survivorship curves result from optimal resource allocation. Evol Ecol Res 2:857–870Google Scholar
  7. Clarke FM, Faulkes CG (1997) Dominance and queen succession in captive colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci 264:993–1000. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH (1984) Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. Amer Nat 123:212–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen AA (2017) Aging across the tree of life: the importance of a comparative perspective for the use of animal models in aging. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis 1864:2680–2689. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dammann P, Burda H (2007) Senescence patterns in African mole-rats (Bathyergidae, Rodentia). In: Begall S, Burda H, Schleich CE (eds) Subterranean rodents: news from underground. Springer, Berlin, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  11. de Magalhães JP, Costa J (2009) A database of vertebrate longevity records and their relation to other life-history traits. J Evol Biol 22:1770–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Magalhães JP, Costa J, Church GM (2007) An analysis of the relationship between metabolism, developmental schedules, and longevity using phylogenetic independent contrasts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards HE, Tweedie CJ, Terranova PF et al (1998) Reproductive aging in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus campbelli. Biol Reprod 58:842–848. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Evdokimov NG (2011) Population dynamics and changes in the population structure of a polymorphic colony of northern mole voles. Russ J Ecol 42:241–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evsikov VI, Skorova SV, Nazarova GG, Moshkin MP (1989) Photoperiod effect on growth and reproductive functions in water vole (Arvicola terrestris L.). Ekologiya 6:58–63Google Scholar
  16. Feoktistova NY (2008) Dwarf hamsters (Phodopus: Cricetidae): systematics, phylogeography, ecology, physiology, behaviour, chemical communication. KMK Scientific Press Ltd, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. Gorbunova V, Bozzella MJ, Seluanov A (2008) Rodents for comparative aging studies: from mice to beavers. Age 30:111–119. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gromov VS (2008) The spatial-and-ethological population structure in rodents. KMK Press, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkwood TBL, Rose MR (1991) Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos Trans R Soc London B: Biol Sci 332:15–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manskikh VN, Gancharova OS, Kondratuk EY, Novikov EA, Skulachev VP, Moshkin MP (2015) Spectrum of spontaneous pathological changes in mole-voles (Ellobius talpinus, Pallas) and the effect of mitochondria-targeted antioxidant SkQ1 on it. Adv Gerontol 28:53–61 (in Russian) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moshkin M, Novikov E, Petrovski D (2007) Skimping as an adaptive strategy in social fossorial rodents: the mole vole (Ellobius talpinus) as an example. Subterr Rodents. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nazazova GG (2013) Effects of seasonal, ontogenetic, and genetic factors on lifespan of male and female progeny of Arvicola amphibious. Front Genet 4:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Novikov EA (2007) Frugal strategy as a base of mole-vole (Ellobius talpinus: Rodentia) adaptations to the fossorial way of life. Zh Obshch Biol 68:268–277 (in Russian) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Novikov EA, Burda G (2013) Ecological and evolutionary preconditions of extended longevity in subterranean rodents. Biol Bull Rev 3:325–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Novikov E, Kondratyuk E, Petrovski D et al (2015a) Reproduction, aging and mortality rate in social subterranean mole voles (Ellobius talpinus Pall.). Biogerontology 16:723–732. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Novikov EA, Kondratyuk EY, Burda H (2015b) Age-related increase of urine cortisol in non-breeding individuals of Fukomys Anselli (Rodentia, Bathyergidae) from a laboratory colony. Zool Zhurnal 94:119–124. (in Russian) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Novikov E, Zadubrovskaya I, Zadubrovskiy P, Titova T (2017) Reproduction, ageing, and longevity in two species of laboratory rodents with different life histories. Biogerontology 18:803–809. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nussey DH, Froy H, Lemaitre J-F, Gaillard J-M, Austad SN (2013) Senescence in natural populations of animals: widespread evidence and its implications for bio-gerontology. Ageing Res Rev 12:214–225. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Panteleev PA (1968) Population ecology of the water vole and methods for control. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian) Google Scholar
  30. Pavlinov IY, Lissovsky AA (2012) The mammals of Russia: a taxonomic and geographic reference. KMK, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  31. Percy DH, Barthold SW (2007) Hamster. Pathology of laboratory rodents and rabbits. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, pp 115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potapov MA, Rogov VG, Ovchinnikova LE et al (2004) The effect of winter food stores on body mass and winter survival of water voles, Arvicola terrestris, in Western Siberia: the implications for population dynamics. Folia Zool 53:37–46Google Scholar
  33. Ricklefs RE, Wikelski M (2002) The physiology/life-history nexus. Trends Ecol Evol 17:462–468. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Novikov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ekaterina Kondratuk
    • 1
  • Tatiana Titova
    • 1
  • Pavel Zadubrovsky
    • 1
  • Inna Zadubrovskaya
    • 1
  • Mikhail Potapov
    • 1
  • Olga Potapova
    • 1
  • Ludmila Proskurnyak
    • 1
  • Galina Nazarova
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Systematics and Ecology of AnimalsSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations