, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 377–385 | Cite as

Framing the inborn aging process and longevity science

  • Colin FarrellyEmail author


The medical sciences are currently dominated by the “disease-model” approach to health extension, an approach that prioritizes the study of pathological mechanisms with the goal of discovering treatment modalities for specific diseases. This approach has marginalized research on the aging process itself, research that could lead to an intervention that retards aging, thus conferring health dividends that would far exceed what could be expected by eliminating any specific disease of aging. This paper offers a diagnosis of how this sub-optimal approach to health extension arose and some general prescriptions concerning how progress could be made in terms of adopting a more rational approach to health extension. Drawing on empirical findings from psychology and economics, “prospect theory” is applied to the challenges of “framing” the inborn aging process given the cognitive capacities of real (rather than rational) decision-makers under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Prospect theory reveals that preferences are in fact dependent on whether particular outcomes of a choice are regarded as “a loss” or “a gain”, relative to a reference point (or “aspiration level for survival”). And this has significant consequences for the way biogerontologists ought to characterise the central aspirations of the field (i.e. to prevent disease versus extend lifespan). Furthermore, it reveals the importance of shifting the existing reference point of the medical sciences to one that is shaped by the findings of evolutionary biology and biodemography.


Aging Disease Framing Health Longevity science 



For their helpful and insightful feedback on earlier versions of this paper, I am grateful to three anonymous reviewers for this journal, S. Jay Olshansky and Aubrey De Grey.


  1. Adelman RC (1995) The alzheimerization of aging. The Gerontologist 35:526–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Black W (1788) A comparative view of the mortality of the human species. Dilly, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer MB, Lui L (1984) Categorization of the elderly by the elderly. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 10:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer MB, Dull V, Lui L (1981) Perceptions of the elderly: stereotypes as prototypes. J Pers Soc Psychol 41:656–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bribiescas R, Ellison P (2008) How hormones mediate trade-offs in human health and disease. In: Stearns S, Koella J (eds) Evolution in health and disease. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 77–94Google Scholar
  6. Butler RN (1969) Age-ism: another form of bigotry. The gerontologist 9:243–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler RN, Miller RA, Perry D, Carnes BA, Williams TF, Cassel C, Brody J, Bernard MA, Partridge L, Kirkwood T, Martin GM, Olshansky SJ (2008) New model of health promotion and disease prevention for the 21st century. BMJ 337:149–150Google Scholar
  8. Cancer Facts & Figures (2008) Atlanta, American Cancer Society. Available at Accessed 4 October 2009
  9. Carnes BA (2007) Senescence as viewed through the lens of comparative biology. Ann NY Acad Sci 1114:14–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnes BA, Olshansky SJ (1993) Evolutionary perspectives on human senescence. Population Devel Rev 19:793–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniels N (2008) Just health: meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles J (1992) Evolution of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89:7320–7324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrelly C (2008) Has the time come to take on time itself? BMJ 337:147–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harman D (1991) The aging process: major risk factor for disease and death. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:5360–5363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayflick L (2000) The future of ageing. Nature 408:267–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayflick L (2003) Has anyone ever died of old age?. International Longevity Centre, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayflick L (2007) Biological aging is no longer an unsolved problem. Ann NY Acad Sci 1100:1–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsiang-Ching K, Hoyert DL, Xu J, Murphy SL (2008) Deaths: final data for 2005. Centre for Disease Control. Available at Accessed 4 October 2009
  19. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica XLVII:263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1986) Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Business 59:S251–S278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirkwood T (1977) Evolution of aging. Nature 270:301–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkwood T (2008) A systematic look at an old problem. Nature 451:644–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirkwood T, Austad S (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller R (2002) Extending life: scientific prospects and political obstacles. Milbank Q 80:155–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Miyamoto J, Eraker S (1988) A multiplicative model of the utility of survival duration and health quality. J Exp Psychol Gen 117:3–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mumpower JL (1988) Lottery games and risky technologies: communications about low probability. Risk Anal 8:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy K, Topel R (2006) The value of health and longevity. J Pol Econ 114:871–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olshansky SJ, Carnes B, Cassel C (1990) In search of methuselah: estimating the upper limits to human longevity. Science 250:634–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Olshansky SJ, Grant M, Brody J, Carnes B (2005) Biodemographic perspectives for epidemiologists. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olshansky SJ, Perry D, Miller R, Butler R (2006) In pursuit of the longevity dividend. The Scientist 20:28–36Google Scholar
  32. Palmore E (1999) Ageism: negative and positive. Springer Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhem P, Liljenstro H (1997) On the coevolution of cognition and consciousness. J Theor Biol 187:601–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riley J (2001) Rising life expectancy: a global history. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmidt DF, Boland SM (1986) Structure of perceptions of older adults: evidence for multiple stereotypes. Psychol Aging 1:255–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychol 5:207–2325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization (2009) Ageing and life course. Available at Accessed 1 October 2009

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political StudiesQueen’s UniversityKingstonONCanada

Personalised recommendations