, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 223–228 | Cite as

The extreme arrogance of anti-aging medicine

  • Robin HollidayEmail author


The anti-aging medicine movement proposes to alter the human body in order to achieve extreme longevity. To do this it has to reverse or by-pass the multiple causes of human aging. These include a large number of age-associated pathologies, each of which is being studied in great detail in research laboratories around the world. The protagonists of anti-aging medicine claim that it will be far more successful than the combined efforts of the innumerable scientists carrying out this research. Aging has an extremely long evolutionary history, and the anatomical structure and physiology of animals is directly related to their finite lifespan. The anti-aging movement proposes in a few decades to reverse what has been the result of millions of years of evolution.


Aging Senescence Pathologies Evolution 


  1. Austad SN (1997) Why we age. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. de Grey ADNJ (2004) Interview with C. Deavans. BBC News Online SpecialsGoogle Scholar
  3. de Grey ADNJ (2006) Extrapoholics anonymous: why demographers’ rejections of a huge rise in cohort life expectancy in this century are overconfident. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1067:83–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finch CE (1990) Longevity, senescence and the genome. University Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayflick L (1994, 1996) How and why we age. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Holliday R (1995) Understanding aging. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirkwood TBL, Holliday R (1979) The evolution of aging and longevity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 205:532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klatz RM (1996) Advances in anti-aging medicine. Larchmont, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Olshansky SJ, Hayflick L, Carnes BA et al (2002) No truth to the fountain of youth. Position statement on human aging. Sci Am 286:78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olshansky SJ, Hayflick L, Perls TT (eds) (2004) Anti-aging medicine: the hype and the reality. J Gerontol Biol Sci 59A:515–709Google Scholar
  12. Warner H et al (2005) Science fact and the SENS agenda. EMBO Rep 6:1006–1008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Academy of ScienceCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.NSWAustralia

Personalised recommendations