Caloric Restriction Increases Longevity Substantially only When the Reaction Norm is Steep
- First Online:
Evolutionary theory leads to the general expectation that dietary restriction will often result in increased survival probabilities, and thus increased lifespan. The reaction norm is a basic tool of evolutionary analysis that quantifies the relationship between environmental parameters and functional characters, including reproduction and longevity. In rodents, the reaction norm connecting adult longevity to caloric intake is fairly steep; small changes in intake lead to large changes in longevity. If this strong quantitative relationship were evolutionarily conserved among all mammals, then the prospects for a substantial increase in human lifespan from caloric restriction would be very good. In theory, however, reaction norms are expected to evolve for fitness related characters such as reproduction and survival. It has been shown experimentally in Drosophila that dietary reaction norms readily evolve in the laboratory, suggesting that they can do so among mammals as well, particularly over the millions of years since contemporary rodents and primates last shared a common ancestor. Our previous work crudely estimates that the dietary reaction norms of rodents and humans have diverged substantially, with a very flat dietary reaction norm for human longevity. These general principles and our specific results suggest that the benefits from human caloric restriction would be minor.
KeywordsAging Caloric restriction Evolution of senescence Human life extension Maximum longevity Phenotypic plasticity Reaction norms
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ball ZB, Barnes RH, Visscher MB (1947) The effects of dietary caloric restriction on maturity and senescence, with particular reference to fertility and longevity. Am J Physiol 150:511–519Google Scholar
- Charlesworth B (1994) Evolution in age-structured populations. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Rauser CL, Mueller LD, Rose MR (2004) Dietary restriction in Drosophila. Science (Letters) 303:1610–1611Google Scholar
- Rose MR (1991) Evolutionary biology of aging. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
- Rose MR, Passananti HK, Matos M (2004) Methuselah flies: a case study in the evolution of aging. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Service PM, Hutchinson EW, MacKinley MD, Rose MR (1985) Resistance to environmental stress in Drosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence. Physiol Zool 58:380–389Google Scholar
- Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar