Biogerontology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 161–164

Caloric Restriction Increases Longevity Substantially only When the Reaction Norm is Steep

Opinion

Abstract

Evolutionary theory leads to the general expectation that dietary restriction will often result in increased survival probabilities, and thus increased lifespan. The reaction norm is a basic tool of evolutionary analysis that quantifies the relationship between environmental parameters and functional characters, including reproduction and longevity. In rodents, the reaction norm connecting adult longevity to caloric intake is fairly steep; small changes in intake lead to large changes in longevity. If this strong quantitative relationship were evolutionarily conserved among all mammals, then the prospects for a substantial increase in human lifespan from caloric restriction would be very good. In theory, however, reaction norms are expected to evolve for fitness related characters such as reproduction and survival. It has been shown experimentally in Drosophila that dietary reaction norms readily evolve in the laboratory, suggesting that they can do so among mammals as well, particularly over the millions of years since contemporary rodents and primates last shared a common ancestor. Our previous work crudely estimates that the dietary reaction norms of rodents and humans have diverged substantially, with a very flat dietary reaction norm for human longevity. These general principles and our specific results suggest that the benefits from human caloric restriction would be minor.

Keywords

Aging Caloric restriction Evolution of senescence Human life extension Maximum longevity Phenotypic plasticity Reaction norms 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball ZB, Barnes RH, Visscher MB (1947) The effects of dietary caloric restriction on maturity and senescence, with particular reference to fertility and longevity. Am J Physiol 150:511–519Google Scholar
  2. Charlesworth B (1994) Evolution in age-structured populations. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Chippindale AK, Leroi AM, Kim SB, Rose MR (1993) Phenotypic plasticity and selection in Drosophila life-history evolution. I. Nutrition and the cost of reproduction. J Evol Biol 6:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clancy DJ, Gems D, Harshman LG, Oldham S, Stocker H, Hafen E, Leevers SJ, Partridge L (2001) Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Science 202:104–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Day T, Rowe L (2002) Developmental thresholds and the evolution of reaction norms for age and size at life-history transitions. Am Nat 159:338–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellison PT, Lager C (1986) Moderate recreational running is associated with lowered salivary progesterone profiles in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:1000–1003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gage TB (2003) The evolution of human phenotypic plasticity: age and nutritional status at maturity. Hum Biol 75:521–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graves JL (1993) The costs of reproduction and dietary restriction: parallels between insects and mammals. Growth Dev Aging 57:233–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Holehan AM, Merry BJ (1985) Modification of the oestrous cycle hormonal profile by dietary restriction. Mech Ageing Dev 32:63–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lager C, Ellison PT (1990) Effect of moderate weight loss on ovarian function assessed by salivary progesterone measurements. Am J Hum Biol 2:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leroi AM, Kim SB, Rose MR (1994) Do phenotypic manipulations reveal evolutionary trade-offs? An experimental test using Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 144:661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merry BJ, Holehan AM (1981) Serum profiles of LH, FSH, testosterone and 5?-DHT from 21 to 1000 days of age in ad libitum fed and dietary restricted rats. Exp Gerontol 16:431–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phelan JP, Austad SN (1989) Natural selection, dietary restriction, and extended longevity. Growth Dev Aging 53:4–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Phelan JP, Rose MR (2005) Why dietary restriction substantially increases longevity in animal models but won’t in humans. Aging Res Rev 4:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pletcher SD, Libert S, Skorupa D (2005) Flies and their golden apples: the effect of dietary restriction on Drosophila aging and age-dependent gene expression. Ageing Res Rev 4:451–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rauser CL, Mueller LD, Rose MR (2004) Dietary restriction in Drosophila. Science (Letters) 303:1610–1611Google Scholar
  17. Rose MR (1991) Evolutionary biology of aging. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose MR, Passananti HK, Matos M (2004) Methuselah flies: a case study in the evolution of aging. World Scientific Publishing, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  19. Rose MR, Vu LN, Park SU, Graves JL (1992) Selection on stress resistance increases longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol 27:241–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Service PM, Hutchinson EW, MacKinley MD, Rose MR (1985) Resistance to environmental stress in Drosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence. Physiol Zool 58:380–389Google Scholar
  21. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Tatar M, Kopelman A, Tu MP, Yin CM, Garofalo RS (2001) Mutant in Drosophila insulin receptor homologue extend lifespan and impair neuroendocrine function. Science 292:107–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack’s principle. Am Nat 100:687–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Life Sciences Core ProgramUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations