Biogerontology

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 387–395 | Cite as

Resistance to Oxidative Stress Induced by Paraquat Correlates Well with Both Decreased and Increased Lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster

Research Article

Abstract

There is increasing support for the notion that genetic variation for lifespan, both within and between species, is correlated with variation in the efficiency of the free radical scavenging system and the ability to withstand oxidative stress. In Drosophila, resistance to dietary paraquat, a free radical generator, is often used as a measure of resistance to oxidative stress and is reported to give firm positive correlations with longevity. Recently it has been suggested that an increase in antioxidative defences in Drosophila only has a beneficial effect in relatively short-lived stocks. This implies that mechanisms of lifespan determination can be different in lines with different genetic constitution. Here we test if variation in resistance to dietary paraquat co-segregates with variation in lifespan in two sets of Drosophila melanogaster lines that were selected for decreased and increased virgin lifespan respectively. Flies of the short-lived lines show decreased resistance to paraquat compared to the control lines, indicating low resistance against oxidative stress. On the other hand, both males and females of the long-lived lines show, despite increased feeding rates on paraquat-supplemented food, no decreased survival compared to control lines. This shows that flies of the long-lived lines have increased paraquat resistance, but that this is masked by increased feeding rate, resulting in increased exposure to paraquat. This suggests that resistance to paraquat is a correlated response to selection on virgin lifespan over the entire genetic range.

Keywords

ageing Drosophila melanogaster ingestion rate lifespan oxidative stress paraquat resistance somatic maintenance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann, M, Bijlsma, R, James, AC, Partridge, L, Zwaan, BJ, Stearns, SC 2001Effects of assay conditions in life history experiments with Drosophila melanogasterJ Evol Biol14199209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arking, R, Buck, S, Berrios, A, Dwyer, S, Baker, GT,III 1991Elevated paraquat resistance can be used as a bioassay for longevity in a genetically based long-lived strain of DrosophilaDev Genet12362370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bokov, A, Chaudhuri, A, Richardson, A 2004The role of oxidative damage and stress in agingMech Ageing Dev125811826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks, AI, Chadwick, CA, Gelbard, HA, Cory-Slechta, DA, Federoff, HJ 1999Paraquat elicited neurobehavioral syndrome caused by dopaminergic neuron lossBrain Res823110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bus, JS, Gibson, JE 1984Paraquat: model for oxidant-initiated toxicityEnviron Health Perspect553746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Driver, C, Georgeou, A 2003Variable effects of vitamin E on Drosophila longevityBiogerontology49195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Finkel, T, Holbrook, NJ 2000Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageingNature408239247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Force, AG, Staples, T, Soliman, S, Arking, R 1995Comparative biochemical and stress analysis of genetically selected Drosophila strains with different longevitiesDev Genet17340351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Girardot, F, Monnier, V, Tricoire, H 2004Genome wide analysis of common and specific stress responses in adult Drosophila melanogasterBMC Genomics574http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/5/74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Harshman, LG, Moore, KM, Magwire, MM 1999Stress resistance and longevity in selected lines of Drosophila melanogasterNeurobiol Aging20521529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Khazaeli, AA, Voorhies, W, Curtsinger, JW 2005Longevity and metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster: Genetic correlations between life span and age-specific metabolic rate in populations artificially selected for long lifeGenetics169231242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirkwood, TB, Holliday, R 1979The evolution of ageing and longevityProc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci205531546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurepa, J, Smalle, J, Montagu, M, Inzé, D 1998Oxidative stress tolerance and longevity in Arabidopsis: the late-flowering mutant gigantea is tolerant to paraquatPlant J14759764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourg, E 2002Are stress resistance and longevity really linked in normal living conditions?Gerontology48109111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, YJ, Seroude, L, Benzer, S 1998Extended life-span and stress resistance in the Drosophila mutant methuselahScience282943946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Luckinbill, LS, Arking, R, Clare, MJ, Cirocco, WC, Buck, S 1984Selection for delayed senescence in Drosophila melanogasterEvolution389961003Google Scholar
  17. Martin, GM, Austad, SN, Johnson, TE 1996Genetic analysis of ageing: role of oxidative damage and environmental stressesNat Genet132534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McCormack, AL, Thiruchelvam, M, Manning-Bog, AB, Thiffault, C, Langston, W, Cory-Slechta, DA, Monte, DA 2002Environmental risk factors and Parkinson’s disease: selective degeneration of nigral dopaminergic neurons caused by the herbicide paraquatNeurobiol Dis10119127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Medawar PB (1952) An Unsolved Problem in Biology. H. K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
  20. Migliaccio, E, Giorgio, M, Mele, S, Pelicci, G, Reboldi, P, Pandolfi, PP, Lanfrancone, L, Pelicci, PG 1999The p66shc adaptor protein controls oxidative stress response and life span in mammalsNature402309313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mockett, RJ, Orr, WC, Rahmandar, JJ, Sohal, BH, Sohal, RS 2001Antioxidant status and stress resistance in long- and short-lived lines of Drosophila melanogasterExp Gerontol36441463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Orr, WC, Sohal, RS 2003Does overexpression of Cu, Zn-SOD extend life span in Drosophila melanogaster?Exp Gerontol38227230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Partridge, L, Andrews, R 1985The effect of reproductive activity on the longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageingJ Insect Physiol31393395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Partridge, L, Fowler, K, Trevitt, S, Sharp, W 1986An examination of the effects of males on the survival and egg-production rates of female Drosophila melanogasterJ Insect Physiol32925929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Partridge, L, Prowse, N, Pignatelli, P 1999Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogasterProc R Soc Lond B266255261Google Scholar
  26. Phillips, JP, Campbell, SD, Michaud, D, Charbonneau, M, Hilliker, AJ 1989Null mutation of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase in Drosophila confers hypersensitivity to paraquat and reduced longevityProc Natl Acad Sci USA8627612765PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose, MR, Charlesworth, B 1981Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experimentsGenetics97187196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Salmon, AB, Marx, DB, Harshman, LG 2001A cost of reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: stress susceptibilityEvolution5516001608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Seto, NOL, Hayashi, S, Tener, GM 1990Overexpression of Cu–Zn-superoxide dismutase in Drosophila does not affect life-spanProc Natl Acad Sci USA8742704274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sohal, RS, Mockett, RJ, Orr, WC 2002Mechanisms of aging: an appraisal of the oxidative stress hypothesisFree Radic Biol Med.33575586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Spencer, CC, Howell, CE, Wright, AR, Promislow, DEL 2003Testing an ‘aging gene’ in long-lived Drosophila strains: increased longevity depends on sex and genetic backgroundAging Cell2123130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Vermeulen CJ (2004) Genetics of lifespan determination in Drosophila melanogaster. PhD thesis, Groningen.Google Scholar
  33. Vermeulen CJ and Bijlsma R (2006) Changes in genetic architecture during relaxation in Drosophila melanogaster selected on divergent virgin life span. J Evol Biol DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00972.x.Google Scholar
  34. Vettraino, J, Buck, S, Arking, R 2001Direct selection for paraquat resistance in Drosophila results in a different extended longevity phenotypeJ Gerontol Biol Sci56AB415B425Google Scholar
  35. Wang, H-D, Kazami-Esfarjani, P, Benzer, S 2004Multiple-stress analysis for isolation of Drosophila longevity genesProc Natl Acad Sci USA1011261012615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams, GC 1957Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescenceEvolution11398411Google Scholar
  37. Yanase, S, Yasuda, K, Ishii, N 2002Adaptive responses to oxidative damage in three mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans (age-1, mev-1 and daf-16) that affect life spanMech Ageing Dev12315791587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zou, S, Meadows, S, Sharp, L, Jan, LY, Jan, YN 2000Genome-wide study of aging and oxidative stress response in Drosophila melanogasterProc Natl Acad Sci USA971372613731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zwaan, BJ, Bijlsma, R, Hoekstra, RF 1995Direct selection on life span in Drosophila melanogasterEvolution49649659Google Scholar
  40. Zwaan, BJ 1999The evolutionary genetics of ageing and longevityHeredity82589597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. Vermeulen
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. Van De  Zande
    • 1
  • R. Bijlsma
    • 1
  1. 1.Evolutionary GeneticsUniversity of GroningenHarenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and GeneticsAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations