Behavior Genetics

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 635–639 | Cite as

The Scarr-Rowe Interaction in Complete Seven-Year WISC Data from the Louisville Twin Study: Preliminary Report

  • Eric Turkheimer
  • Christopher E. Beam
  • Deborah W. Davis
Original Research

Abstract

We examine updated Wechsler IQ data in 7-year old twins from the Louisville Twin Study for evidence of an interaction between the heritability of IQ and socioeconomic status. Data records that had never been entered were recovered, allowing us to increase previously reported sample sizes by more than 20 %. Twin families were assigned socioeconomic status scores using a Hollingshead index based on parental education and occupation. A structural equation model in which genetic and environmental variances were modeled as squared linear functions of SES provided ambiguous replication of earlier findings from the National Collaborative Perinatal Project: relations between SES and heritability for performance and full scale IQ were in the same direction as the previous report, but at p < 0.07. As was the case in Turkheimer et al. (Psychol Sci 14(6):623–628, 2003), no interaction was found for VIQ. These results cannot yet be taken as a definitive replication of Turkheimer et al. (Psychol Sci 14(6):623–628, 2003). Many more measurement occasions, subtests and environmental moderators remain to be analyzed.

Keywords

GE interaction Wechsler intelligence scale for children Socioeconomic status 

References

  1. Asbury K, Wachs TD, Plomin R (2005) Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood. Intelligence 33(6):643–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates TC, Lewis GJ, Weiss A (2013) Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects on adult intelligence. Psychol Sci 24:2111–2116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beam CR, Turkheimer E (2013) Phenotype–environment correlations in longitudinal twin models. Dev Psychopathol 25(01):7–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolan CV, de Kort JM, van Beijsterveldt TC, Bartels M, Boomsma DI (2014) GE Covariance through phenotype to environment transmission: an assessment in longitudinal twin data and application to childhood anxiety. Behav Genet 44(3):240–253PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischbein S (1980) IQ and social class. Intelligence 4:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grant MD, Kremen WS, Jacobson KC, Franz C, Xian H, Eisen SA, Toomey R, Murray RE, Lyons MJ (2010) Does parental education have a moderating effect on the genetic and environmental influences of general cognitive ability in early adulthood? Behav Genet 40(4):438–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hanscombe KB, Trzaskowski M, Haworth CM, Davis OS, Dale PS, Plomin R (2012) Socioeconomic status (SES) and children’s intelligence (IQ): in a UK-representative sample SES moderates the environmental, not genetic, effect on IQ. PLoS One 7(2):e30320PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirkpatrick RM, McGue M, Iacono WG (2015) Replication of a gene–environment interaction via multimodel inference: additive-genetic variance in Adolescents’ General Cognitive Ability Increases with Family-of-Origin Socioeconomic Status. Behav Genet 45(2):200–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2015) Mplus user’s guide, 6th Ed. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  10. Purcell S (2002) Variance components models for gene–environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res 5(06):554–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rowe DC, Jacobson KC, van den Oord EJCG (1999) Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: parental education level as a moderator. Child Dev 70:1151–1162. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00084 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Scarr-Salapatek S (1971) Race, social class, and IQ. Science 174:1285–1295. doi:10.1126/science.174.4016.1285 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tucker-Drob E, Bates T (2014) The world’s literature on gene x social class interactions on cognitive ability: a meta-analysis. In: Presentation at 2014 meeting of the behavior genetics association, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tucker-Drob EM, Rhemtulla M, Harden KP, Turkheimer E, Fask D (2011) Emergence of a gene × socioeconomic status interaction on infant mental ability between 10 months and 2 years. Psychol Sci 22:125–133. doi:10.1177/0956797610392926 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Turkheimer E, Horn EE (2014) Interactions between socioeconomic status and components of variation in cognitive ability. In: Behavior genetics of cognition across the lifespan. Springer, New York, pp 41–68Google Scholar
  16. Turkheimer E, Haley A, Waldron M, D’Onofrio B, Gottesman II (2003) Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychol Sci 14(6):623–628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Turkheimer E, Beam CE, Finkel D, Dickens WT, Sederberg R, Davis DW (2015) The Scarr-Rowe Interaction in the Louisville Twin Study. In: Paper presented at the meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  18. van der Sluis S, Willemsen G, de Geus EJ, Boomsma DI, Posthuma D (2008) Gene–environment interaction in adults’ IQ scores: measures of past and present environment. Behav Genet 38(4):348–360PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilson RS (1983) The Louisville twin study: developmental synchronies in behavior. Child Dev 54:298–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Turkheimer
    • 1
  • Christopher E. Beam
    • 2
  • Deborah W. Davis
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.University of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations