Nonparametric Estimates of Gene × Environment Interaction Using Local Structural Equation Modeling
- 450 Downloads
Gene × environment (G × E) interaction studies test the hypothesis that the strength of genetic influence varies across environmental contexts. Existing latent variable methods for estimating G × E interactions in twin and family data specify parametric (typically linear) functions for the interaction effect. An improper functional form may obscure the underlying shape of the interaction effect and may lead to failures to detect a significant interaction. In this article, we introduce a novel approach to the behavior genetic toolkit, local structural equation modeling (LOSEM). LOSEM is a highly flexible nonparametric approach for estimating latent interaction effects across the range of a measured moderator. This approach opens up the ability to detect and visualize new forms of G × E interaction. We illustrate the approach by using LOSEM to estimate gene × socioeconomic status interactions for six cognitive phenotypes. Rather than continuously and monotonically varying effects as has been assumed in conventional parametric approaches, LOSEM indicated substantial nonlinear shifts in genetic variance for several phenotypes. The operating characteristics of LOSEM were interrogated through simulation studies where the functional form of the interaction effect was known. LOSEM provides a conservative estimate of G × E interaction with sufficient power to detect statistically significant G × E signal with moderate sample size. We offer recommendations for the application of LOSEM and provide scripts for implementing these biometric models in Mplus and in OpenMx under R.
KeywordsLOSEM LOESS Kernel regression Gene × environment interaction Cognitive ability
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) research Grant R21-HD069772 to Dr. Tucker-Drob and R21-AA020588 to Dr. Harden. Daniel A. Briley was supported by NIH training Grant T32HD007081. The Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin is supported by NIH Center Grant R24HD042849.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Daniel A. Briley, K. Paige Harden, Timothy C. Bates, and Elliot M. Tucker-Drob have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The ECLS-B was approved by state institutional review boards where testing was conducted. All participants provided informed consent before taking part in the study.
- Benjamin Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57(1):289–300Google Scholar
- Eubank RL (1999) Nonparametric regression and spline smoothing, 2nd edn. Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fox J (2000) Nonparametric simple regression: Smoothing scatterplots. In: Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-130Google Scholar
- Gasser T, Gervini D, Molinari L (2004) Kernel estimation, shape-invariant modeling and structural analysis. In: Hauspie R, Cameron N, Molinari L (eds) Methods in human growth research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 15–33Google Scholar
- Good P (2005) Permutation, parametric, and bootstrap tests of hypotheses, 3rd edn. New York, SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Hallquist M (2011) MplusAutomation: automating Mplus model estimation and interpretation. R package version 0.5. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MplusAutomation/index.html
- Hildebrandt A, Wilhelm O, Robitzsch A (2009) Complementary and competing factor analytic approaches for the investigation of measurement invariance. Rev Psychol 16(2):87–102Google Scholar
- Li Q, Racine J (2007) Nonparametric eco nometrics: theory and practice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998–2010) Mplus user’s guide (6th ed). Los Angeles: Muthén and MuthénGoogle Scholar
- Neale MC, Maes HHM (2005) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
- Rudemo M (1982) Empirical choice of histograms and kernel density estimates. Scand Stat Theory Appl 9:65–78Google Scholar
- Snow K, Derecho A, Wheeless S, Lennon J, Rosen J, Rogers J, Einaudi P (2009) Early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B), kindergarten 2006 and 2007 data file user’s manual (2010–010). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education SciencesGoogle Scholar
- Takezawa K (2006) Introduction to nonparametric regression. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar