Behavior Genetics

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 438–450 | Cite as

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Adult Mental Health: Evidence for Gene-Environment Interplay as a Function of Maternal and Paternal Discipline and Affection

Original Research

Abstract

Researchers have long theorized that genetic influence on mental health may differ as a function of environmental risk factors. One likely moderator of genetic and environmental influences on psychopathological symptoms is parenting behavior, as phenotypic research shows that negative aspects of parent–child relationships are associated with greater likelihood of mental illness in adulthood. The current study examined whether levels of reported parental discipline and affection experienced in childhood act as a trigger, or buffer, for adult mental health problems. Results from a nationwide twin sample suggest level of father’s discipline and affection, as reported by now-adult twins, moderated genetic and environmental influences on internalizing symptoms in adulthood, such that heritability was greatest at the highest levels of discipline and affection. Father’s affection also moderated the etiological influences on alcohol use problems, with greater heritability at the lowest levels of affection. No moderating effect was found for mothers. Findings suggest relationships with fathers in childhood can have long-lasting effects on the etiological influences on adult mental health outcomes.

Keywords

Mental health Parent–child relationships Gene-environment interplay Twin Behavior genetics 

References

  1. Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belsky J, Pluess M (2009) Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychol Bull 135:885–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blazei RW, Iacono WG, McGues M (2008) Father-child transmission of antisocial behavior: the moderatingr role of father’s presence in the home. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47(4):406–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewin CR, Andrews B, Gotlib IH (1993) Psychopathology and early experience: a reappraisal of retrospective reports. Psychol Bull 113(1):82–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ (1994) Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychol Rev 101:568–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Button TM, Lau JYF, Maughan B, Eley TC (2008) Parental punitive discipline, negative life events and gene-environment interplay in the development of externalizing behavior. Psychol Med 38:29–39PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cadoret RJ, Yates W, Troughton E, Woodworth G, Stewart MA (1995) Genetic-environmental interaction in the genesis of aggressivity and conduct disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:916–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis BJ, Boyce WT (2008) Biological sensitivity to context. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feinberg ME, Button TMM, Neiderhiser JM, Reiss D, Hetherington EM (2007) Parenting and adolescent antisocial behavior and depression: evidence of genotype x parenting environment interaction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64(4):457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harold GT, Elam KK, Lewis G, Rice F, Thapar A (2012) Interparental conflict, parent psychopathology, hostile parenting, and child antisocial behavior: examining the role of maternal versus paternal influences using a novel genetically sensitive research design. Dev Psychopathol 24(4):1283–1295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hicks BM, DiRago AC, Iacono WG, McGue M (2009a) Gene-environment interplay in internalizing disorders: consistent findings across six environmental risk factors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(10):1309–1317PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hicks BM, South SC, DiRago AC, Iacono WG, McGue M (2009b) Environmental adversity and increasing genetic risk for externalizing disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66(6):640–648PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jarnecke AM, South SC (2014) Genetic and environmental influences on alcohol use problems: moderation by romantic partner support, but not family or friend support. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 38(2):367–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendler KS, Thornton LM, Gilman SE, Kessler RC (2000) Sexual orientation in a national sample of twin and sibling pairs. Am J Psychiatry 157:1843–1846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun B, Wittchen H-U (1998a) The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatric Res 7:171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kessler RC, Wittchen H-U, Abelson JM, Kendler KS, Knauper B, McGonagle KA, Zhao S (1998b) Methodological studies of the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI) in the US national comorbidity survey. Int J Method Psychiatr Res 7:33–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kessler RC, Gilman SE, Thornton LM, Kendler KS (2004) Health, wellbeing, and social responsibility in the MIDUS twin and sibling subsamples. In: Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC (eds) How healthy are we? A national study of wellbeing at midlife. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 124–152Google Scholar
  18. Lachman ME, Weaver SL (1997) The Midlife Development Inventory (MIDI) personality scales: Scale construction and scoring. WalthamGoogle Scholar
  19. Lau JYF, Eley TC (2008) Disentangling gene-environment correlations and interactions on adolescent depressive symptoms. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49:142–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lykken DT, Bouchard TJ, McGue M, Tellegen A (1990) The Minnesota Twin Family Registry: some initial findings. Acta Genetica Medica Gemellol 39:35–70Google Scholar
  21. Markon K, Krueger RF (2004) An empirical comparison of information-theoretic selection criteria for multivariate behavior genetic models. Behav Genet 34:593–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGue M, Bouchard TJ (1984) Quality of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet 14:325–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monroe SM, Simons AD (1991) Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol Bull 110:406–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2012) Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA, Muthen & MuthenGoogle Scholar
  25. Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Greenwald S, Weissman M (1995) Low parental care as a risk factor to lifetime depression in a community sample. J Affect Disord 33(3):173–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plomin R, DeFries JC, Knopik V, Neiderhiser JM (2012) Behavioral genetics, 6th edn. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Purcell S (2002) Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res 5:554–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25:111–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raine A (2002) Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: a review. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30:311–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossi AS (2001) Caring and doing for others: social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothrauff TC, Cooney TM, An JS (2009) Remembered parenting styles and adjustment in middle and late adulthood. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64B(1):137–146PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rowe DC (1981) Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived parenting: a twin study. Dev Psychol 17:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Russek LG, Schwartz GE (1997) Feelings of parental caring predict health status in midlife: a 35-year follow-up of the Harvard Mastery of Stress Study. J Behav Med 20:1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Selzer ML (1971) The Michigan alcohol screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry 127:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. South SC, Krueger RF (2008) Marital quality moderates genetic and environmental influences on the internalizing spectrum. J Abnorm Psychol 117:826–837PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. South SC, Krueger RF (2011) Genetic and environmental influences on internalizing psychopathology vary as a function of economic status. Psychol Med 41:107–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. South SC, Krueger RF (2013) Marital satisfaction and physical health: evidence for an Orchid effect. Psychol Sci 24(3):373–378PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuvblad C, Grann M, Lichtenstein P (2006) Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: gene-environment interaction. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:734–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van der Sluis S, Posthuma D, Dolan CV (2012) A note on false positives and power in G × E modelling of twin data. Behav Genet 42(1):170–186PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Hulle CA, Lahey BB, Rathouz PJ (2013) Operating characteristics of alternative statistical methods for detecting gene-by-measured environment interaction in the presence of gene–environment correlation in twin and sibling studies. Behav Genet 43(1):71–84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilhelm K, Niven H, Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D (2005) The stability of the parental bonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychol Med 35(3):387–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wittchen HU (1994) Reliability and validity studies of the WHO composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 28:57–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Young-Wolff KC, Enoch M, Prescott CA (2011) The influence of gene-environment interactions on alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorders: a comprehensive review. Clin Psychol Rev 31:800–816PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations