Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 45–55 | Cite as

A Twin-Sibling Study on the Relationship Between Exercise Attitudes and Exercise Behavior

  • Charlotte HuppertzEmail author
  • Meike Bartels
  • Iris E. Jansen
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
  • Gonneke Willemsen
  • Marleen H. M. de Moor
  • Eco J. C. de Geus
Original Research

Abstract

Social cognitive models of health behavior propose that individual differences in leisure time exercise behavior are influenced by the attitudes towards exercise. At the same time, large scale twin-family studies show a significant influence of genetic factors on regular exercise behavior. This twin–sibling study aimed to unite these findings by demonstrating that exercise attitudes can be heritable themselves. Secondly, the genetic and environmental cross-trait correlations and the monozygotic (MZ) twin intrapair differences model were used to test whether the association between exercise attitudes and exercise behavior can be causal. Survey data were obtained from 5,095 twins and siblings (18–50 years). A genetic contribution was found for exercise behavior (50 % in males, 43 % in females) and for the six exercise attitude components derived from principal component analysis: perceived benefits (21, 27 %), lack of skills, support and/or resources (45, 48 %), time constraints (25, 30 %), lack of energy (34, 44 %), lack of enjoyment (47, 44 %), and embarrassment (42, 49 %). These components were predictive of leisure time exercise behavior (R² = 28 %). Bivariate modeling further showed that all the genetic (0.36 < |rA| < 0.80) and all but two unique environmental (0.00 < |rE| < 0.27) correlations between exercise attitudes and exercise behavior were significantly different from zero, which is a necessary condition for the existence of a causal effect driving the association. The correlations between the MZ twins’ difference scores were in line with this finding. It is concluded that exercise attitudes and exercise behavior are heritable, that attitudes and behavior are partly correlated through pleiotropic genetic effects, but that the data are compatible with a causal association between exercise attitudes and behavior.

Keywords

Twin-sibling design Twins Correlational approach Physical activity Heritability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the help of Conor Dolan with the genetic model fitting procedures. This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK, RO1DK092127), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH, RO1MH58799-03), the European Research Council (ERC-230374), and the Netherlands Institute for Scientific Research (NWO): Resolving cause and effect in the association between regular exercise and psychological well-being (NWO 904-61-193), the twin-family database for behavior genetics and genomics studies (NWO 480-04-004), and the Spinozapremie (NWO SPI-56-464). De Moor is financially supported by NWO VENI 016-115-035.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The authors have full control of all primary data and they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Supplementary material

10519_2013_9617_MOESM1_ESM.doc (137 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 137 kb)

References

  1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sport Exer 32(Suppl. 9):S498–S504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action control: from cognition to behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 11–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allender S, Cowburn G, Foster C (2006) Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health Educ Res 21(6):826–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels M, de Moor MHM, van der Aa N, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC (2012) Regular exercise, subjective wellbeing, and internalizing problems in adolescence: causality or genetic pleiotropy? Front Genet 3:4. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00004 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker MH (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2(4):324–508Google Scholar
  6. Biddle SJH, Nigg CR (2000) Theories of exercise behavior. Int J of Sport Psychol 31(2):290–304Google Scholar
  7. Boker S, Neale M, Maes H, Wilde M, Spiegel M, Brick T, Spies J, Estabrook R, Kenny S, Bates T, Mehta P, Fox J (2011) OpenMx: an open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 76(2):306–317PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boomsma DI, Vink JM, van Beijsterveldt TC, de Geus EJC, Beem AL, Mulder EJ, Derks EM, Riese H, Willemsen GA, Bartels M, van den Berg M, Kupper NH, Polderman TJ, Posthuma D, Rietveld MJ, Stubbe JH, Knol LI, Stroet T, van Baal GC (2002) Netherlands Twin Register: a focus on longitudinal research. Twin Res 5(5):401–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC, Vink JM, Stubbe JH, Distel MA, Hottenga JJ, Posthuma D, van Beijsterveldt TC, Hudziak JJ, Bartels M, Willemsen G (2006) Netherlands Twin Register: from twins to twin families. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6):849–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouchard C, Hoffman EP (eds) (2011) Genetic and molecular aspects of sport performance. Blackwell Publishing, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouchard C, Rankinen T (2001) Individual differences in response to regular physical activity. Med Sci Sport Exer 33(6 Suppl.):S446–S451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brutsaert TD, Parra EJ (2006) What makes a champion? Explaining variation in human athletic performance. Resp Physiol Neurobi 151(2–3):109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan A, Hutchison KE, Seals DR, Allen DL (2007) A transdisciplinary model integrating genetic, physiological, and psychological correlates of voluntary exercise. Health Psychol 26(1):30–39PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckworth J, Lee RE, Regan G, Schneider LK, DiClemente CC (2007) Decomposing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for exercise: application to stages of motivational readiness. Psychol Sport Exerc 8(4):441–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Courneya KS, Hellsten L-AM (1998) Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers and preferences: an application of the five-factor model. Pers Indiv Differ 24(5):625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis C, Fox J, Brewer H, Ratusny D (1995) Motivations to exercise as a function of personality characteristics, age, and gender. Pers Indiv Differ 19(2):165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Geus EJC, de Moor MHM (2008) A genetic perspective on the association between exercise and mental health. Ment Health Phys Act 1(2):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Geus EJC, de Moor MHM (2011) Genes, exercise, and psychological factors. In: Bouchard C, Hoffman EP (eds) Genetic and molecular aspects of sport performance. Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, pp 294–305Google Scholar
  19. De Moor MHM, Beem AL, Stubbe JH, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC (2006) Regular exercise, anxiety, depression and personality: a population-based study. Prev Med 42(4):273–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Moor MHM, Boomsma DI, Stubbe JH, Willemsen G, de Geus EJC (2008) Testing causality in the association between regular exercise and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Arch Gen Psychiat 65(8):897–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Moor MHM, Willemsen G, Rebollo-Mesa I, Stubbe JH, de Geus EJC, Boomsma DI (2011) Exercise participation in adolescents and their parents: evidence for genetic and generation specific environmental effects. Behav Genet 41(2):211–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Moor MHM, Costa PT, Terracciano A, Krueger RF, de Geus EJC, Toshiko T, Penninx BW, Esko T, Madden PA, Derringer J, Amin N, Willemsen G, Hottenga JJ, Distel MA, Uda M, Sanna S, Spinhoven P, Hartman CA, Sullivan P, Realo A, Allik J, Heath AC, Pergadia ML, Agrawal A, Lin P, Grucza R, Nutile T, Ciullo M, Rujescu D, Giegling I, Konte B, Widen E, Cousminer DL, Eriksson JG, Palotie A, Peltonen L, Luciano M, Tenesa A, Davies G, Lopez LM, Hansell NK, Medland SE, Ferrucci L, Schlessinger D, Montgomery GW, Wright MJ, Aulchenko YS, Janssens AC, Oostra BA, Metspalu A, Abecasis GR, Deary IJ, Räikkönen K, Bierut LJ, Martin NG, van Duijn CM, Boomsma DI (2012) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for personality. Mol Psychiatr 17:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Vilhena e Santos DM, Katzmarzyk PT PT, Seabra AF, Maia JA JA (2012) Genetics of physical activity and physical inactivity in humans. Behav Genet 42(4):559–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Derks EM, Dolan CV, Boomsma DI (2006) A test of the equal environment assumption (EEA) in multivariate twin studies. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(3):403–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Devereaux Melillo K, Williamson E, Futrell M, Chamberlain C (1997) A self-assessment tool to measure older adults’ perceptions regarding physical fitness and exercise activity. J Adv Nurs 25(6):1220–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dishman RK (1990) Determinants of participation in physical activity. In: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, Sutton JR, McPherson BD (eds) Exercise, fitness and health: a consensus of current knowledge. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 75–101Google Scholar
  27. Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  28. Eaves LJ (1977) Inferring the causes of human variation. J R Stat Soc 140(3):324–355Google Scholar
  29. Eaves LJ, Hatemi PK (2008) Transmission of attitudes toward abortion and gay rights: effects of genes, social learning and mate selection. Behav Genet 38(3):247–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ekkekakis P (2008) The genetic tidal wave finally reached our shores: will it be the catalyst for a critical overhaul of the way we think and do science? Ment Health Phys Act 1(2):47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ (2005) Some like it vigorous: measuring individual differences in the preference for and tolerance of exercise intensity. J Sport Exercise Psy 27(3):350–374Google Scholar
  32. Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Nieman DC, Swain DP (2011) American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sport Exer 43(7):1334–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Biddle SJH (2002) A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. J Sport Exercise Psy 24(1):3–32Google Scholar
  35. Hainer V, Zamrazilová H, Spálová J, Hainerová I, Kunesová M, Aldhoon B, Bendlová B (2008) Role of hereditary factors in weight loss and its maintenance. Physiol Res 57(Suppl. 1):S1–S15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hatemi PK, Hibbing JR, Medland SE, Keller MC, Alford JR, Smith KB, Martin NG, Eaves LJ (2010) Not by twins alone: using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs. Am J Polit Sci 54(3):798–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huppertz C, Bartels M, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Boomsma DI, Hudziak JJ, de Geus EJC (2012) The impact of shared environmental factors on exercise behavior from age 7 to 12 years. Med Sci Sport Exer 44(10):2025–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Vernon PA (1996) Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. J Pers 64(3):577–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King AC, Blair SN, Bild DE, Dishman RK, Dubbert PM, Marcus BH, Oldridge NB, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Powell KE, Yeager KK (1992) Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults. Med Sci Sport Exer 24(6 Suppl.):S221–S236Google Scholar
  40. Martin NG (1978) Genetics of sexual and social attitudes in twins. Prog Clin Biol Res 24A:13–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin NG, Eaves LJ, Heath AC, Jardine R, Feingold LM, Eysenck HJ (1986) Transmission of social attitudes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 83(12):4364–4368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martínez-González MA, Varo JJ, Santos JL, de Irala J, Gibney M, Kearney J, Martínez JA (2001) Prevalence of physical activity during leisure time in the European Union. Med Sci Sport Exer 33(7):1142–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neale MC, Roysamb E, Jacobson K (2006) Multivariate genetic analysis of sex limitation and GxE interaction. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(4):481–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nigg CR, Borrelli B, Maddock J, Dishman RK (2008) A theory of physical activity maintenance. Appl Psychol-Int Rev 57(4):544–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olson JM, Vernon PA, Harris JA, Jang KL (2001) The heritability of attitudes: a study of twins. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(6):845–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parfitt G, Hughes S (2009) The exercise intensity-affect relationship: evidence and implications for exercise behavior. J Exerc Sci Fit 7(2 Suppl):S34–S41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petter M, Blanchard C, Kemp KAR, Mazoff AS, Ferrier SN (2009) Correlates of exercise among coronary heart disease patients: review, implications and future directions. Eur J Cardiov Prev R 16(5):515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE, McGuffin P (2008) Behavioral genetics, 5th edn. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhodes RE, Smith NEI (2006) Personality correlates of physical activity: a review and meta-analysis. Brit J Sport Med 40(12):958–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhodes RE, Fiala B, Conner M (2009) A review and meta-analysis of affective judgments and physical activity in adult populations. Ann Behav Med 38(3):180–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sallis JF, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, Faucher P, Elder JP, Blanchard J, Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM (1989) A multivariate study of determinants of vigorous exercise in a community sample. Prev Med 18(1):20–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scarr S, Carter-Saltzman L (1979) Twin method: defense of a critical assumption. Behav Genet 9(6):527–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwarzer R (1992) Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: theoretical approaches and a new model. In: Schwarzer R (ed) Self-efficacy: thought control of action. Taylor & Francis, Bristol, pp 217–243Google Scholar
  55. Schwetschenau HM, O’Brien WH, Cunningham CJL, Jex SM (2008) Barriers to physical activity in an on-site corporate fitness center. J Occup Health Psych 13(4):371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sechrist KR, Walker SN, Pender NJ (1987) Development and psychometric evaluation of the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale. Res Nurs Health 10(6):357–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stubbe JH, de Geus EJC (2009) Genetics of exercise behavior. In: Kim Y-K (ed) Handbook of behavior genetics. Springer, New York, pp 343–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stubbe JH, Boomsma DI, Vink JM, Cornes BK, Martin NG, Skytthe A, Kyvik KO, Rose RJ, Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Harris JR, Pedersen NL, Hunkin J, Spector TD, de Geus EJC (2006) Genetic influences on exercise participation in 37.051 twin pairs from seven countries. PLoS One 1(1):e22PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stubbe JH, de Moor MHM, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC (2007) The association between exercise participation and well-being: a co-twin study. Prev Med 44(2):148–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M (2008) Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sport Exer 40(1):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trost SG, Own N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W (2002) Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sport Exer 34(12):1996–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van der Aa N, de Geus EJC, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Boomsma DI, Bartels M (2010) Genetic influences on individual differences in exercise behavior during adolescence. Internat J Pediatr Epub. doi: 10.1155/2010/138345 Google Scholar
  63. Van Sluijs EMF, van Poppel MNM, Twisk JWR, Brug J, van Mechelen W (2005) The positive effect on determinants of physical activity of a tailored, general practice-based physical activity intervention. Health Educ Res 20(3):345–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warburton DER, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, Nettlefold L, Bredin SSD (2010) A systematic review of the evidence for Canada’s physical activity guidelines for adults. Int J of Behav Nutr Phy 7(39):1–220Google Scholar
  65. Willemsen G, Posthuma D, Boomsma DI (2005) Environmental factors determine where the Dutch live: results from the Netherlands Twin Register. Twin Res Hum Genet 8(4):312–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Willemsen G, Vink JM, Abdellaoui A, den Braber A, van Beek JHDA, Draisma HHM, van Dongen J, van’t Ent D, Geels LM, van Lien R, Ligthart L, Kattenberg M, Mbarek H, de Moor MH, Neijts M, Pool R, Stroo N, Kluft C, Suchiman HE, Slagboom PE, de Geus EJ, Boomsma DI (2013) The Adult Netherlands Twin Register: twenty-five years of survey and biological data collection. Twin Res Hum Genet 16(1):271–281PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlotte Huppertz
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Meike Bartels
    • 1
    • 2
  • Iris E. Jansen
    • 1
  • Dorret I. Boomsma
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gonneke Willemsen
    • 1
  • Marleen H. M. de Moor
    • 1
  • Eco J. C. de Geus
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological PsychologyVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care ResearchVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Biological PsychologyVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations