Additional Evidence Against Shared Environmental Contributions to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Problems
A recent meta-analysis “Burt (Psychol Bull 135:608–637, 2009)” indicated that shared environmental influences (C) do not contribute to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Unfortunately, the meta-analysis relied almost exclusively on classical twin studies. Although useful in many ways, some of the assumptions of the classical twin model (e.g., dominant genetic and shared environmental influences do not simultaneously influence the phenotype) can artifactually decrease estimates of C. There is thus a need to confirm that dominant genetic influences are not suppressing estimates of C on ADHD. The current study sought to do just this via the use of a nuclear twin family model, which allows researchers to simultaneously model and estimate dominant genetic and shared environmental influences. We examined two independent samples of child twins: 312 pairs from the Michigan State University Twin Registry and 854 pairs from the PrE School Twin Study in Sweden. Shared environmental influences were found to be statistically indistinguishable from zero and to account for less than 5 % of the variance. We conclude that the presence of dominant genetic influences does not account for the absence of C on ADHD.
KeywordsADHD Nuclear twin family model Shared environment Genetic influences
Sample one was supported by R01-MH081813 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. Sample two was supported by grants from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research and from the Swedish Research Council. The authors thank all participating twins and their families.
- Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2003) Manual for ASEBA adult forms and profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
- Chang Z, Lichtenstein P, Asherson PJ, Larsson H (2012) A developmental twin study of attention problems: evidence for genetic stability and innovation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32(2):140–149Google Scholar
- Keller MC, Medland SE (2008) Evaluation of the cascade model—a new extended twin family model. Paper presented at the Behavioral Genetics Association, LouisvilleGoogle Scholar
- Lehn H, Derks EM, Hudziak JJ, Heutink P, van Beijsterveldt TC, Boomsma DI (2007) Attention problems and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in discordant and concordant monozygotic twins: evidence of environmental mediators. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2006) Mplus user’s guide. Muthén and Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2003) Mx: statistical modeling, 6th edn. Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, RichmondGoogle Scholar
- Plomin R, DeFries JC, McClearn GE, McGruffin P (2008) Behavioral genetics, 5th edn. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar