Can Genetic Differences Explain Vocal Dialect Variation in Sperm Whales, Physeter macrocephalus?
- 925 Downloads
Sperm whale social groups can be assigned to vocal clans based on their production of codas, short stereotyped patterns of clicks. It is currently unclear whether genetic variation could account for these behavioural differences. We studied mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation among sympatric vocal clans in the Pacific Ocean, using sequences extracted from sloughed skin samples. We sampled 194 individuals from 30 social groups belonging to one of three vocal clans. As in previous studies of sperm whales, mtDNA control region diversity was low (π = 0.003), with just 14 haplotypes present in our sample. Both hierarchical AMOVAs and partial Mantel tests showed that vocal clan was a more important factor in matrilineal population genetic structure than geography, even though our sampling spanned thousands of kilometres. The variance component attributed to vocal dialects (7.7%) was an order of magnitude higher than those previously reported in birds, while the variance component attributed to geographic area was negligible. Despite this, the two most common haplotypes were present in significant quantities in each clan, meaning that variation in the control region cannot account for behavioural variation between clans, and instead parallels the situation in humans where parent-offspring transmission of language variation has resulted in correlations with neutral genes. Our results also raise questions for the management of sperm whale populations, which has traditionally been based on dividing populations into geographic ‘stocks’, suggesting that culturally-defined vocal clans may be more appropriate management units.
KeywordsSperm whale Vocal dialect Cultural transmission Genetic population structure
The National Geographic Society and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada provided funding for fieldwork. L.R. was supported by a NERC Postdoctoral Fellowship and M.L.D. was supported by a Killam Memorial Postdoctoral Fellowship and a Vice-Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Fellowship (UNSW). Mary Dillon and Jenny Christal kindly shared the results of their genetic and photographic analyses respectively. Mike Ritchie, Jeff Graves, Kelly Stewart and Valentina Islas provided analytical advice and support. We thank Jeff Graves, Karen Martien, Kelly Stewart and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved the manuscript.
- Arnbom T (1987) Individual identification of sperm whales. Rep Int Whal Commn 37:201–204Google Scholar
- Baker MC (1982) Vocal dialect recognition and population genetic consequences. Am Zool 22:561–569Google Scholar
- Barrett-Lennard L (2000) Population structure and mating patterns of killer whales (Orcinus orca) as revealed by DNA analysis. Ph.D., University of British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Chepko-Sade DB, Halpin ZT (eds) (1987) Mammalian dispersal patterns: the effects of social structure on population genetics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Dillon MC (1996) Genetic structure of sperm whale populations assessed by mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. PhD Thesis, Dalhousie University, HalifaxGoogle Scholar
- Dillon MC, Richard KR, Whitehead H, Wright JM (2002) Social and population genetic structure of sperm whales assessed by molecular genetic analyses. In: Pfeiffer C (ed) Molecular and cell biology of marine mammals. Krieger, Malabar, pp 43–52Google Scholar
- Donovan GP (1991) A review of IWC stock boundaries. Rep Int Whal Comm 13:39–68Google Scholar
- Duchene S, Archer FI, Vilstrup J, Caballero S, Morin PA (2011) Mitogenome phylogenetics: the impact of using single regions and partitioning schemes on topology, substitution rate and divergence time estimation. PLoS OneGoogle Scholar
- Dufault S, Whitehead H, Dillion M (1999) An examination of the current knowledge on the stock structure of sperm whales (Physter macrocephalus) worldwide. J Cetacean Res Manage 1(1):1–10Google Scholar
- Engelhaupt D, Rus Hoelzel A, Nicholson C, Frantzis A, Mesnick S, Gero S, Whitehead H, Rendell L, Miller P, De Stefanis R, Cañadas A, Airoldi S, Mignucci-Giannoni AA (2009) Female philopatry in coastal basins and male dispersion across the North Atlantic in a highly mobile marine species, the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). Mol Ecol 18(20):4193–4205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04355.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ford MJ, Hanson MB, Hempelmann JA, Ayres KL, Emmons CK, Schorr GS, Baird RW, Balcomb KC, Wasser SK, Parsons KM, Balcomb-Bartok K (2011) Inferred paternity and male reproductive success in a killer whale (Orcinus orca) population. J Hered. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esr067
- Mesnick SL, Taylor BL, Archer FI, Martien KK, Treviño SE, Hancock-Hanser BL, Medina SCM, Pease VL, Robertson KM, Straley JM, Baird RW, Calambokidis J, Schorr GS, Wade P, Burkanov V, Lunsford CR, Rendell L, Morin PA (2011) Sperm whale population structure in the eastern and central north pacific inferred by the use of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Mol Ecol Res 11:278–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02973.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morin PA, Archer FI, Foote AD, Vilstrup J, Allen EE, Wade P, Durban J, Parsons K, Pitman R, Li L, Bouffard P, Abel Nielsen SC, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E, Gilbert MTP, Harkins T (2010) Complete mitochondrial genome phylogeographic analysis of killer whales (Orcinus orca) indicates multiple species. Genome Res 20(7):908–916. doi: 10.1101/gr.102954.109 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rendell LE, Whitehead H (2003b) Comparing repertoires of sperm whales: a multiple methods approach. Bioacoustics 14(1):61–81Google Scholar
- Whitehead H (2003) Sperm whales: social evolution in the ocean. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar