Behavior Genetics

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 3–18 | Cite as

Heritability, Assortative Mating and Gender Differences in Violent Crime: Results from a Total Population Sample Using Twin, Adoption, and Sibling Models

  • Thomas Frisell
  • Yudi Pawitan
  • Niklas Långström
  • Paul Lichtenstein
Original Research

Abstract

Research addressing genetic and environmental determinants to antisocial behaviour suggests substantial variability across studies. Likewise, evidence for etiologic gender differences is mixed, and estimates might be biased due to assortative mating. We used longitudinal Swedish total population registers to estimate the heritability of objectively measured violent offending (convictions) in classic twin (N = 36,877 pairs), adoptee-parent (N = 5,068 pairs), adoptee-sibling (N = 10,610 pairs), and sibling designs (N = 1,521,066 pairs). Type and degree of assortative mating were calculated from comparisons between spouses of siblings and half-siblings, and across consecutive spouses. Heritability estimates for the liability of violent offending agreed with previously reported heritability for self-reported antisocial behaviour. While the sibling model yielded estimates similar to the twin model (A ≈ 55%, C ≈ 13%), adoptee-models appeared to underestimate familial effects (A ≈ 20–30%, C ≈ 0%). Assortative mating was moderate to strong (rspouse = 0.4), appeared to result from both phenotypic assortment and social homogamy, but had only minor effect on variance components. Finally, we found significant gender differences in the etiology of violent crime.

Keywords

Antisocial behavior Violent crime Heritability GLMM Probit link Assortative mating Twin Adoption Sibling 

References

  1. Baker LA, Mack W et al (1989) Sex-differences in property crime in a Danish adoption cohort. Behav Genet 19(3):355–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker LA, Raine A et al (2008) Differential genetic and environmental influences on reactive and proactive aggression in children. J Abnorm Child Psych 36(8):1265–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellis MA, Hughes K et al (2005) Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences. J Epidemiol Commun H 59(9):749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohman M (1978) Some genetic aspects of alcoholism and criminality. A population of adoptees. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35(3):269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt SA (2009) Are there meaningful etiological differences within antisocial behavior? Results of a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 29(2):163–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt SA, Klump KL (2009) The etiological moderation of aggressive and nonaggressive antisocial behavior by age. Twin Res Hum Genet 12(4):343–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt SA, Neiderhiser JM (2009) Aggressive versus nonaggressive antisocial behavior: distinctive etiological moderation by age. Dev Psychol 45(4):1164–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt SA, McGue M et al (2005) Sources of covariation among the child-externalizing disorders: informant effects and the shared environment. Psychol Med 35(8):1133–1144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey G (1992) Twin imitation for antisocial behavior: implications for genetic and family environment research. J Abnorm Psychol 101(1):18–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centerwall BS, Robinette CD (1989) Twin concordance for dishonorable discharge from the military—with a review of the genetics of antisocial-behavior. Compr Psychiatry 30(5):442–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coid B, Lewis SW et al (1993) A twin study of psychosis and criminality. Br J Psychiatry 162:87–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Pearson Education Limited, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  13. Frisell T, Lichtenstein P et al (2011) Violent crime runs in families: a total population study of 12.5 million individuals. Psychol Med 41:97–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hicks BM, Krueger RF et al (2004) Family transmission and heritability of externalizing disorders—a twin-family study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61(9):922–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krueger RF, Moffitt TE et al (1998) Assortative mating for antisocial behavior: developmental and methodological implications. Behav Genet 28(3):173–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krueger RF, Hicks BM et al (2002) Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: modeling the externalizing spectrum. J Abnorm Psychol 111(3):411–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krug EG, Mercy JA et al (eds) (2002) World report on violence and health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Lichtenstein P, De Faire U et al (2002) The Swedish Twin Registry: a unique resource for clinical, epidemiological and genetic studies. J Intern Med 252(3):184–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lichtenstein P, Sullivan PF et al (2006) The Swedish twin registry in the third millennium: an update. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6):875–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lichtenstein P, Yip BH et al (2009) Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: a population-based study. Lancet 373(9659):234–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maes HHM, Neale MC et al (1998) Assortative mating for major psychiatric diagnoses in two population-based samples. Psychol Med 28(6):1389–1401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McAllister CM, Speidel SE et al (2011) Genetic parameters for intramuscular fat percentage, marbling score, scrotal circumference, and heifer pregnancy in Red Angus cattle. J Anim Sci E-pub. doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3538
  23. Nagoshi CT, Johnson RC et al (1987) Phenotypic assortative mating Vs social homogamy among Japanese and Chinese parents in the Hawaii family study of cognition. Behav Genet 17(5):477–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Press, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Pawitan Y, Reilly M et al (2004) Estimation of genetic and environmental factors for binary traits using family data. Stat Med 23(3):449–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reynolds CA, Baker LA et al (1996) Models of spouse similarity: applications to fluid ability measured in twins and their spouses. Behav Genet 26(2):73–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reynolds CA, Baker LA et al (2000) Multivariate models of mixed assortment: phenotypic assortment and social homogamy for education and fluid ability. Behav Genet 30(6):455–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reynolds CA, Barlow T et al (2006) Alcohol, tobacco and caffeine use: spouse similarity processes. Behav Genet 36(2):201–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhee SH, Waldman ID (2002) Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychol Bull 128(3):490–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rhule-Louie DM, McMahon RJ (2007) Problem behavior and romantic relationships: assortative mating, behavior contagion, and desistance. Clin Child Fam Psychol 10(1):53–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sethi D, Hughes K, et al (2010) European report on preventing violence and knife crime among young people. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  32. Svensson AC, Sandin S et al (2009) Maternal effects for preterm birth: a genetic epidemiologic study of 630,000 families. Am J Epidemiol 170(11):1365–1372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor J, McGue M et al (2000) Sex differences, assortative mating, and cultural transmission effects on adolescent delinquency: a twin family study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 41(4):433–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tuvblad C, Raine A et al (2009) Genetic and environmental stability differs in reactive and proactive aggression. Aggress Behav 35(6):437–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Grootheest DS, van den Berg SM et al (2008) Marital resemblance for obsessive-compulsive, anxious and depressive symptoms in a population-based sample. Psychol Med 38(12):1731–1740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Frisell
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yudi Pawitan
    • 1
  • Niklas Långström
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul Lichtenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstituteStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Violence PreventionKarolinska InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations