Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 50–57 | Cite as

Genetic Variance in a Component of the Language Acquisition Device: ROBO1 Polymorphisms Associated with Phonological Buffer Deficits

  • Timothy C. Bates
  • Michelle Luciano
  • Sarah E. Medland
  • Grant W. Montgomery
  • Margaret J. Wright
  • Nicholas G. Martin
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Abstract

The region containing ROBO1 (Chromosome 3p12.3) has been implicated as a susceptibility gene for reading disorder and language deficit by translocation and linkage data. No association studies have yet been reported supporting any candidate gene. Here we report the first association of this gene with language deficits, specifically with phonological buffer deficits (a phenotype implicated in language acquisition, Specific Language Impairment and Speech Sound Disorder) and dyslexia (reading and spelling ability traits) in an unselected sample of adolescent twins and their siblings. Family-based analyses were performed on 144 tag SNPs in ROBO1, typed in 538 families with up to five offspring and tested for association with a developmental marker of language impairment (phonological buffer capacity, assessed using non word repetition).A reading and spelling ability measure—based on validated measures of lexical processing (irregular word) and grapheme–phoneme decoding (pseudo word)—and measures of short-term and working memory were also analysed. Significant association for phonological buffer capacity was observed for 21 of 144 SNPs tested, peaking at 8.70 × 10−05 and 9.30 × 10−05 for SNPs rs6803202 and rs4535189 respectively for nonword repetition, values that survive correction for multiple testing. Twenty-two SNPs showed significant associations for verbal storage (forward digit span)—a trait linked to phonological span. By contrast, just 5 SNPs reached nominal significance for working-memory, not surviving correction, and, importantly, only one SNP in the 144 tested reached nominal significance (0.04) for association with reading and spelling ability. These results provide strong support for ROBO1 as a gene involved in a core trait underpinning language acquisition, with a specific function in supporting a short-term buffer for arbitrary phonological strings. These effects of ROBO1 appear to be unrelated to brain mechanisms underpinning reading ability, at least by adolescence. While replication will be critical, the present results strongly support ROBO1 as the first gene discovered to be associated with language deficits affecting normal variation in language ability. Its functional role in neuronal migration underlying bilateral symmetry and lateralization of neuronal function further suggests a role in the evolution of human language ability.

Keywords

Specific language impairment Dyslexia ROBO1 Association Language Reading ability Spelling ability Family-based 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the twins and their parents for their co-operation; Anjali Henders and Megan Campbell for managing sample processing and DNA extraction; Alison Mackenzie for coordinating the reading test battery mail-out; Thanuja Gunasekera for coordinating the language test battery mail-out; Marlene Grace, Ann Eldridge and the research interviewers for data collection. We thank The Royal Society of Edinburgh, The Office of the Chief Scientist of Scotland, The Australian Research Council and National Health and Medical Research Council and for present and past support of this research. ML is a Royal Society of Edinburgh/Lloyds TSB Foundation for Scotland Personal Research Fellow.

References

  1. Altshuler D, Brooks LD, Chakravarti A, Collins FS, Daly MJ, Donnelly P (2005) A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437:1299–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews W, Liapi A, Plachez C, Camurri L, Zhang J, Mori S et al (2006) Robo1 regulates the development of major axon tracts and interneuron migration in the forebrain. Development 133(11):2243–2252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews W, Barber M, Hernadez-Miranda LR, Xian J, Rakic S, Sundaresan V et al (2008) The role of Slit-Robo signaling in the generation, migration and morphological differentiation of cortical interneurons. Dev Biol 313(2):648–658CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anitha A, Nakamura K, Yamada K, Suda S, Thanseem I, Tsujii M et al (2008) Genetic analyses of roundabout (ROBO) axon guidance receptors in autism. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B(7):1019–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley A, Gathercole S, Papagno C (1998) The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychol Rev 105(1):158–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber M, Di Meglio T, Andrews WD, Hernandez-Miranda LR, Murakami F, Chedotal A et al (2009) The role of Robo3 in the development of cortical interneurons. Cereb Cortex 19(Suppl 1):i22–i31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates TC, Castles A, Coltheart M, Gillespie N, Wright M, Martin NG (2004) Behaviour genetic analyses of reading and spelling: a component processes approach. Aust J Psychol 56(2):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates TC, Castles A, Luciano M, Wright M, Coltheart M, Martin N (2007a) Genetic and environmental bases of reading and spelling: a unified genetic dual route model. Read Writ 20(1–2):147–171Google Scholar
  9. Bates TC, Luciano M, Castles A, Coltheart M, Wright MJ, Martin NG (2007b) Replication of reported linkages for dyslexia and spelling and suggestive evidence for novel regions on chromosomes 4 and 17. Eur J Hum Genet 15(2):194–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates TC, Luciano M, Wright M, Montgomery GW, Martin NG (2007c) Genetic architecture of language: phonological and lexical storage capacity deficits in specific language impairment & dyslexia. Paper presented at the 37th annual meeting of the behavior genetics association, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–6 June 2007Google Scholar
  11. Bates TC, Luciano M, Wright MJ, Montgomery GW, Martin NG (2007d) Heritability of phonological storage deficits related to specific language impairment in reading ability. Paper presented at the Behavior Genetics Association 37th Annual Meeting, Amsterdam. Behav Genet 37:734–809Google Scholar
  12. Bates TC, Luciano M, Lind PA, Wright M, Montgomery GW, Martin NG (2008) Recently-derived variants of brain-size genes ASPM, MCPH1, CDK5RAP and BRCA1 not associated with general cognition, reading or language. Intelligence 36:689–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bates TC, Lind PA, Luciano M, Montgomery GW, Martin NG, Wright MJ (2009a) Dyslexia and DYX1C1: deficits in reading and spelling associated with a missense mutation. Mol Psychiatry. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.120
  14. Bates TC, Price JF, Harris SE, Marioni RE, Fowkes FG, Stewart MC et al (2009b) Association of KIBRA and memory. Neurosci Lett 458(3):140–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Benyamin B, McRae AF, Zhu G, Gordon S, Henders AK, Palotie A et al (2009) Variants in TF and HFE explain approximately 40% of genetic variation in serum-transferrin levels. Am J Hum Genet 84(1):60–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc B 26:211–246Google Scholar
  17. Castles A, Coltheart M (1993) Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition 47(2):149–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen WM, Abecasis GR (2007) Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans. Am J Hum Genet 81(5):913–926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cope NA, Hill G, van den Bree M, Harold D, Moskvina V, Green EK et al (2005) No support for association between Dyslexia Susceptibility 1 Candidate 1 and developmental dyslexia. Mol Psychiatry 10(3):237–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahdouh F, Anthoni H, Tapia-Paez I, Peyrard-Janvid M, Schulte-Korne G, Warnke A et al (2009) Further evidence for DYX1C1 as a susceptibility factor for dyslexia. Psychiatr Genet 19(2):59–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. de Bakker PI, Yelensky R, Pe’er I, Gabriel SB, Daly MJ, Altshuler D (2005) Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet 37(11):1217–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dediu D, Ladd DR (2007) Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(26):10944–10949CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dollaghan C, Campbell TF (1998) Nonword repetition and child language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41(5):1136–1146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher SE, Francks C, Marlow AJ, MacPhie IL, Newbury DF, Cardon LR et al (2002) Independent genome-wide scans identify a chromosome 18 quantitative-trait locus influencing dyslexia. Nat Genet 30(1):86–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Galaburda AM, LoTurco J, Ramus F, Fitch RH, Rosen GD (2006) From genes to behavior in developmental dyslexia. Nat Neurosci 9(10):1213–1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gathercole SE (2006) Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Appl Psycholinguist 27(4):513–543Google Scholar
  27. Gathercole SE, Willis CS, Baddeley AD, Emslie H (1994) The Children’s Test of Nonword Repetition: a test of phonological working memory. Memory 2(2):103–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ge D, Zhang K, Need AC, Martin O, Fellay J, Urban TJ et al (2008) WGAViewer: software for genomic annotation of whole genome association studies. Genome Res 18(4):640–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hannula-Jouppi K, Kaminen-Ahola N, Taipale M, Eklund R, Nopola-Hemmi J, Kaariainen H et al (2005) The axon guidance receptor gene ROBO1 is a candidate gene for developmental dyslexia. PLoS Genet 1(4):50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson DN (1984) Multidimensional aptitude battery manual, vol 1. Research Psychologists Press, Port Huron, MIGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson AD, Handsaker RE, Pulit SL, Nizzari MM, O’Donnell CJ, de Bakker PI (2008) SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics 24(24):2938–2939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kovas Y, Plomin R (2006) Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences. Trends Cogn Sci 10(5):198–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lind P, Luciano M, Duffy D, Castles A, Wright MJ, Martin NG et al (2009) Dyslexia and DCDC2: normal variation in reading and spelling is associated with DCDC2 polymorphisms in an Australian population sample. Eur J Hum Genet 18(6):668–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LoTurco JJ, Bai J (2006) The multipolar stage and disruptions in neuronal migration. Trends Neurosci 29(7):407–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Luciano M, Lind PA, Duffy DL, Castles A, Wright MJ, Montgomery GW et al (2007) A haplotype spanning KIAA0319 and TTRAP is associated with normal variation in reading and spelling ability. Biol Psychiatry 62(7):811–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McGregor B, Pfitzner J, Zhu G, Grace M, Eldridge A, Pearson J et al (1999) Genetic and environmental contributions to size, color, shape, and other characteristics of melanocytic naevi in a sample of adolescent twins. Genet Epidemiol 16(1):40–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meng H, Hager K, Held M, Page GP, Olson RK, Pennington BF et al (2005) TDT-association analysis of EKN1 and dyslexia in a Colorado twin cohort. Hum Genet 118(1):87–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Newbury DF, Bonora E, Lamb JA, Fisher SE, Lai CS, Baird G et al (2002) FOXP2 is not a major susceptibility gene for autism or specific language impairment. Am J Hum Genet 70(5):1318–1327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nopola-Hemmi J, Taipale M, Haltia T, Lehesjoki AE, Voutilainen A, Kere J (2000) Two translocations of chromosome 15q associated with dyslexia. J Med Genet 37(10):771–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nopola-Hemmi J, Myllyluoma B, Haltia T, Taipale M, Ollikainen V, Ahonen T et al (2001) A dominant gene for developmental dyslexia on chromosome 3. J Med Genet 38(10):658–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nyholt DR (2004) A simple correction for multiple testing for SNPs in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74(4):765–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Olson RK, Byrne B (2005) Genetic and environmental influences on reading and language ability and disability. In: Catts HW, Kamhi AG (eds) The connections between language and reading disabilities. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 173–200Google Scholar
  43. Paracchini S, Scerri T, Monaco AP (2007) The genetic lexicon of dyslexia. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 8:57–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Paracchini S, Steer CD, Buckingham LL, Morris AP, Ring S, Scerri T et al (2008) Association of the KIAA0319 dyslexia susceptibility gene with reading skills in the general population. Am J Psychiatry 165(12):1576–1584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennington BF, Lefly DL (2001) Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Dev 72(3):816–833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Plomin R, Kovas Y, Haworth CMA (2007) Generalist genes: genetic links between brain, mind, and education. Mind Brain Educ 1(1):11–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC (2003) Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19(1):149–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Schousboe K, Willemsen G, Kyvik KO, Mortensen J, Boomsma DI, Cornes BK et al (2003) Sex differences in heritability of BMI: a comparative study of results from twin studies in eight countries. Twin Res 6(5):409–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schumacher J, Anthoni H, Dahdouh F, Konig IR, Hillmer AM, Kluck N et al (2006) Strong genetic evidence of DCDC2 as a susceptibility gene for dyslexia. Am J Hum Genet 78(1):52–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaywitz SE, Escobar MD, Shaywitz BA, Fletcher JM, Makuch R (1992) Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. N Engl J Med 326(3):145–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. SLI Consortium (2004) Highly significant linkage to the SLI1 locus in an expanded sample of individuals affected by specific language impairment. Am J Hum Genet 74(6):1225–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stein CM, Schick JH, Gerry Taylor H, Shriberg LD, Millard C, Kundtz-Kluge A et al (2004) Pleiotropic effects of a chromosome 3 locus on speech-sound disorder and reading. Am J Hum Genet 74(2):283–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  54. Vernes SC, Newbury DF, Abrahams BS, Winchester L, Nicod J, Groszer M et al (2008) A functional genetic link between distinct developmental language disorders. N Engl J Med 359(22):2337–2345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang Y, Paramasivam M, Thomas A, Bai J, Kaminen-Ahola N, Kere J et al (2006) DYX1C1 functions in neuronal migration in developing neocortex. Neuroscience 143(2):515–522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler adult intelligence scale III. Psychological Corporation, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright MJ, De Geus E, Ando J, Luciano M, Posthuma D, Ono Y et al (2001) Genetics of cognition: outline of a collaborative twin study. Twin Res 4(1):48–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy C. Bates
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michelle Luciano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sarah E. Medland
    • 3
  • Grant W. Montgomery
    • 3
  • Margaret J. Wright
    • 3
  • Nicholas G. Martin
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Cognitive Aging and Cognitive EpidemiologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Genetic Epidemiology LaboratoryQueensland Institute of Medical ResearchBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations