Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 776–783 | Cite as

Analyzing Intra-person Variation: Hybridizing the ACE Model with P-Technique Factor Analysis and the Idiographic Filter

  • John R. Nesselroade
  • Peter C. M. Molenaar
Original Research

Abstract

Integrating idiographic and nomothetic approaches to the study of behavior has met with success via the idiographic filter (IF) which separates irrelevant inter-individual differences from relevant inter-individual similarities at the level of construct measurement in order to facilitate drawing conclusions regarding nomothetic relationships among the constructs. We propose an integration of the IF and the ACE behavior genetics models through the use of P-technique factor analysis and its dynamic factor analysis extensions and examine how it can strengthen the modeling of genetic and environmental effects in behavioral data representing intra-person variation, change, and process.

Keywords

Intraindividual variability Process Idiographic filter ACE model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by R21 Grant AG034284-01 from the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health (USA) and National Science Foundation Grant 0852147.

References

  1. Anderson TW (1963) The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series. Psychometrika 28:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltes PB, Nesselroade JR (1973) The developmental analysis of individual differences on multiple measures. In: Nesselroade JR, Reese HW (eds) Life-span developmental psychology: methodological issues. Academic Press, New York, pp 219–249Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter C (1963) Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In: Harris CW (ed) Problems in measuring change. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  4. Browne MW, Nesselroade JR (2005) Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: some promising uses and extensions of ARMA time series models. In: Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle JJ (eds) Psychometrics: a festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 415–452Google Scholar
  5. Browne MW, Zhang G (2005) User’s guide: DyFA: dynamic factor analysis of lagged correlation matrices. Psychology Department Ohio State University, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  6. Cattell RB (1963) The structuring of change by P-technique and incremental R-technique. In: Harris CW (ed) Problems in measuring change. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp 167–198Google Scholar
  7. Cattell RB (1966) Guest editorial: Multivariate behavioral research and the integrative challenge. Multivar Behav Res 1:4–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cattell RB, Scheier IH (1961) The meaning and measurement of neuroticism and anxiety. Ronald Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cattell RB, Cattell AKS, Rhymer RM (1947) P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysical source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika 12:267–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford DH (1987) Humans as self-constructing living systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman BJ, Santucci AK (2003) Idiodynamic profiles of cardiovascular activity: a P-technique approach. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 38(4):295–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtzman WH (1963) Statistical models for the study of change in the single case. In: Harris CW (ed) Problems in measuring change. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp 199–211Google Scholar
  13. Lebo MA, Nesselroade JR (1978) Intraindividual differences dimensions of mood change during pregnancy identified in five P-technique factor analyses. J Res Pers 12:205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loehlin JC (1998) Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, 4th ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin NG, Eaves LJ (1977) The genetical analysis of covariance structure. Heredity 38:79–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McArdle JJ, Goldsmith HH (1990) Some alternative structural equation models for multivariate biometric analyses. Behav Genet 20(5):569–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Meredith W (1964) Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika 29:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meredith W. (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factor invariance. Psychometrika 58:525–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meredith W, Horn JL (2001) The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In: Collins LM, Sayer AG (ed) New methods for the analysis of change. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 203–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Millsap RE, Meredith W (2007) Factorial invariance: historical perspectives and new problems. In: Cudeck R, MacCallum RC (ed), 100 years of factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  21. Molenaar PCM (1985) A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika 50(2):181-202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molenaar PCM (2004) A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology—this time forever. Meas Interdiscip Res Perspect 2:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molenaar PCM (2010) On the limits of standard quantitative genetic modeling of inter-individual variation: extensions, ergodic conditions and a new genetic factor model of intra-individual variation. In: Hood KE, Halpern CT, Greenberg G, Lerner RM (eds) Handbook of developmental science, behavior, and genetics. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Molenaar PCM, Nesselroade JR (2009) The recoverability of p–technique factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res 44:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nesselroade JR (1970) Application of multivariate strategies to problems of measuring and structuring long-term change. In: Goulet LR, Baltes PB (ed) Life-span developmental psychology: research and theory. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–207Google Scholar
  26. Nesselroade JR (2010) On an emerging third discipline of scientific psychology. In: Newell KM, Molenaar PCM (eds) Individual pathways of change and development. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Nesselroade JR, Ford DH (1985) P-technique comes of age: multivariate, replicated, single-subject designs for research on older adults. Res Aging 7:46–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nesselroade JR, Ford DH (1987) Methodological considerations in modeling living systems. In: Ford ME, Ford DH (ed) Humans as self–constructing living systems: putting the framework to work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 47–79Google Scholar
  29. Nesselroade JR, Molenaar PCM (2010) Emphasizing intraindividual variability in the study of development over the lifespan. In: Overton WF (ed) Cognition, biology, and methods across the lifespan. Volume 1 of the handbook of life-span development. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Nesselroade JR, McArdle JJ, Aggen SH, Meyers JM (2002) Alternative dynamic factor models for multivariate time-series analyses. In: Moskowitz DM, Hershberger SL (ed) Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: advances and techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 235–265Google Scholar
  31. Nesselroade JR, Gerstorf D, Hardy SA, Ram N (2007) Idiographic filters for psychological constructs. Meas Interdiscip Res Perspect 5:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plomin R, Nesselroade JR (1990) Behavior genetics and personality change. J Pers 58:191–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rausch JR (2009) Investigating change in intraindividual factor structure over time. Appl Psychol Meas 33(4):266–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stemmler G (1992) Differential psychophysiology: persons in situations. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  35. Thurstone LL (1947) Multiple factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. West B (1985) An essay on the importance of being nonlinear. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Zevon M, Tellegen A (1982) The structure of mood change: idiographic/nomothetic analysis. J Pers Soc Pyschol 43:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of VirginiaCharlottesville USA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations