Behavior Genetics

, 40:12

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Risky Sexual Behaviour and its Relationship With Personality

  • B. P. Zietsch
  • K. J. H. Verweij
  • J. M. Bailey
  • M. J. Wright
  • N. G. Martin
Original Research


Risky sexual behaviour is a major health issue in society, and it is therefore important to understand factors that may predispose individuals to such behaviour. Research suggests a link between risky sexual behaviour and personality, but the basis of this link remains unknown. Hans Eysenck proposed that personality is related to sexual behaviour via biological underpinnings of both. Here we test the viability of this perspective by analysing data from identical and non-identical twins (N = 4,904) who completed a questionnaire assessing sexual attitudes and behaviour as well as personality. Using genetic modelling of the twin data, we found that risky sexual behaviour was significantly positively correlated with Impulsivity (r = .27), Extraversion (r = .24), Psychoticism (r = .20), and Neuroticism (r = .09), and that in each case the correlation was due primarily to overlapping genetic influences. These findings suggest that the genetic influences that shape our personality may also predispose us to risky sexual behaviour.


Risky sexual behaviour Personality Impulsivity Extraversion Neuroticism Psychoticism Genetic Environmental Twins 


  1. Abma JC, Sonenstein FL (2001) Sexual activity and contraceptive practices among teenagers in the United States, 1988 and 1995Google Scholar
  2. Aral SO (2001) Sexually transmitted diseases: magnitude, determinants and consequences. Int J STD AIDS 12(4):211–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bricker JB, Stallings MC, Corley RP, Wadsworth SJ, Bryan A, Timberlake DS et al (2006) Genetic and environmental influences on age at sexual initiation in the Colorado Adoption Project. Behav Genet 36(6):820–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook RL, Clark DB (2005) Is there an association between alcohol consumption and sexually transmitted diseases? A systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 32(3):156–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Darroch JE, Frost JJ, Singh S (2001) Can more progress be made? Teenage sexual and reproductive behavior in developed countries. The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Delgado-Rodriguez M, Gomez-Olmedo M, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Galvez-Vargas R (1997) Unplanned pregnancy as a major determinant in inadequate use of prenatal care. Prev Med 26(6):834–838CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Duffy DL, Martin NG (1994) Inferring the direction of causation in cross-sectional twin data: theoretical and empirical considerations. Genet Epidemiol 11(6):483–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunne MP, Martin NG, Statham DJ, Slutske WS, Dinwiddie SH, Bucholz KK et al (1997) Genetic and environmental contributions to variance in age at first sexual intercourse. Psychol Sci 8(3):211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eysenck HJ (1976) Sex and personality. Open Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ (1977) Place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British J Soc Clin Psychol 16(FEB):57–68Google Scholar
  11. Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ, Barrett P (1985) A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Pers Individ Differ 6(1):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fullerton D, Dickson R, Eastwood AJ, Sheldon TA (1997) Preventing unintended teenage pregnancies and reducing their adverse effects. Qual Health Care 6(2):102–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Geller PA (2004) Pregnancy as a stressful life event. Cns Spectr 9(3):188–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Heath AC, Madden PAF, Martin NG (1998) Assessing the effects of cooperation bias and attrition in behavioral genetic research using data-weighting. Behav Genet 28(6):415–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoyle RH, Fejfar MC, Miller JD (2000) Personality and sexual risk taking: a quantitative review. J Pers 68(6):1203–1231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Vernon PA (1996) Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. J Pers 64(3):577–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Angleitner A, Riemann R, Vernon PA (2002) Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Pers Individ Differ 33(1):83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loehlin JC (1992) Genes and environment in personality development. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  19. Loehlin JC (1996) The Cholesky approach: a cautionary note. Behav Genet 26(1):65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marston C, King E (2006) Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. Lancet 368(9547):1581–1586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin NG, Martin PG (1975) The inheritance of scholastic abilities in a sample of twins: I. Ascertainment of the sample and diagnosis of zygosity. Ann Hum Genet 39:213–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller JD, Lynam D, Zimmerman RS, Logan TK, Leukefeld C, Clayton R (2004) The utility of the five factor model in understanding risky sexual behavior. Pers Individ Differ 36(7):1611–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mustanski B, Viken RJ, Kaprio J, Winter T, Rose RJ (2007) Sexual behavior in young adulthood: a population-based twin study. Health Psychol 26(5):610–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Neale MC, Eaves LJ, Kendler KS (1994) The power of the classical twin study to resolve variation in threshold traits. Behav Genet 24(3):239–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH (2006) Mx: statistical modeling, 7th edn. Department of Psychiatry, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  27. Ooki S, Yamada K, Asaka A, Hayakawa K (1990) Zygosity diagnosis of twins by questionnaire. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 39:109–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Posthuma D, Beem AL, de Geus EJC, van Baal GCM, von Hjelmborg JB, Lachine I et al (2003) Theory and practice in quantitative genetics. Twin Res 6(5):361–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sato T (2005) The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire brief version: factor structure and reliability. J Psychol 139(6):545–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitt DP (2004) The big five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. Eur J Pers 18(4):301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trobst KK, Herbst JH, Masters HL, Costa PT (2002) Personality pathways to unsafe sex: personality, condom use, and HIV risk behaviors. J Res Pers 36(2):117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Verweij KJH, Zietsch BP, Bailey JM, Martin NG (2009) Shared aetiology of risky sexual behaviour and adolescent misconduct: genetic and environmental influences. Genes Brain Behav 8:107–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zietsch BP, Morley KI, Shekar SN, Verweij KJH, Keller MC, Macgregor S et al (2008) Genetic factors predisposing to homosexuality may increase mating success in heterosexuals. Evol Hum Behav 29:424–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. P. Zietsch
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. J. H. Verweij
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. M. Bailey
    • 3
  • M. J. Wright
    • 1
  • N. G. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Genetic Epidemiology UnitQueensland Institute of Medical ResearchBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations